<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.preservationsound.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fine Recording Inc: Pioneers in High-Fidelity Studio Recording: UPDATED &#8211; 4 by Jonathan Parle</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3939#comment-161735</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Parle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3939#comment-161735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Tom,

I found the link to this page in the booklet accompanying the latest Volume II 6-LP release of Mercury Living Presence recordings. Whilst I understand these latest LPs are derived from the 1630 masters, I actually prefer the sound of the LPs to my CD equivalents (in the case where the repertoire overlaps). I don&#039;t know what this says about my ears...Notwithstanding, this latest set (and the one before) are almost worth the money purely on account of the excellent essays in the accompanying booklets - especially the second set which contains an excellent selection of photos I had never seen before.

I see we are of the same class of &#039;66 vintage. Being the age that I am, by the time I was earning an income the original LPs from the so-called Golden Age had all but disappeared from the shelves of record stores. I had been aware of Mercury, Everest and RCA for some time of course through my listening to ABC FM in Australia back in the 70s (when they produced and presented regular programs specifically orientated to audiophile calibre recordings). But it was not until I was in a record store in around 1990 that I saw my first Mercury Living Presence classical reissue on CD (the Respighi Pines / Fountains of Rome and The Birds).

Over the next decade I amassed a considerable collection of these CD reissues. More recently I have purchased nearly all the Speakers Corner LP reissues as well as the two aforementioned LP sets from Universal. It thus goes without saying then that I am a huge fan of Mercury recordings, though of course I also love my vintage Deccas, RCAs, Everests and DGG, etc.

On the subject of the Detroit Symphony, I had an interesting email exchange last year with a recently retired long-term violinist from the orchestra. We were discussing the Paray era and he mentioned that one of the cellists who had retired at the same time, had actually been in the orchestra since the Paray days - a very long career indeed in the same orchestra - we would have been talking about 50 years. I also mentioned what I consider to be one of Paray&#039;s greatest recordings - and what I consider to be a landmark early Mercury Stereo using the U47 / 201 layout at Old Orchestra Hall - the seemingly neglected Chausson Symphony which I have on the CD reissue catalogue number 434 389-2. The recently retired violinist told me that during his long career with the orchestra, he never recalls them ever having played the piece. Infact I have never heard or seen it ever programmed in Australia and can&#039;t ever recall hearing any performance over the radio!

Anyway, I would just like to thank you for the excellent information and the excellent contributions you have made to the booklets in the latest Mercury reissues. Not a week has gone by in my house in the last 23 years without at least a couple of Mercury Living Presence recordings being played (just last night was the Saint-Saens Organ Symphony and the Mendelssohn / Chopin Cello Sonatas). Your parents may no longer be with us but it is true to say that they have had a profoundly positive effect on my life through their expert, tireless and concerted efforts in bringing true high fidelity sound into &quot;home audiences&quot; such as myself everywhere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom,</p>
<p>I found the link to this page in the booklet accompanying the latest Volume II 6-LP release of Mercury Living Presence recordings. Whilst I understand these latest LPs are derived from the 1630 masters, I actually prefer the sound of the LPs to my CD equivalents (in the case where the repertoire overlaps). I don&#8217;t know what this says about my ears&#8230;Notwithstanding, this latest set (and the one before) are almost worth the money purely on account of the excellent essays in the accompanying booklets &#8211; especially the second set which contains an excellent selection of photos I had never seen before.</p>
<p>I see we are of the same class of &#8217;66 vintage. Being the age that I am, by the time I was earning an income the original LPs from the so-called Golden Age had all but disappeared from the shelves of record stores. I had been aware of Mercury, Everest and RCA for some time of course through my listening to ABC FM in Australia back in the 70s (when they produced and presented regular programs specifically orientated to audiophile calibre recordings). But it was not until I was in a record store in around 1990 that I saw my first Mercury Living Presence classical reissue on CD (the Respighi Pines / Fountains of Rome and The Birds).</p>
<p>Over the next decade I amassed a considerable collection of these CD reissues. More recently I have purchased nearly all the Speakers Corner LP reissues as well as the two aforementioned LP sets from Universal. It thus goes without saying then that I am a huge fan of Mercury recordings, though of course I also love my vintage Deccas, RCAs, Everests and DGG, etc.</p>
<p>On the subject of the Detroit Symphony, I had an interesting email exchange last year with a recently retired long-term violinist from the orchestra. We were discussing the Paray era and he mentioned that one of the cellists who had retired at the same time, had actually been in the orchestra since the Paray days &#8211; a very long career indeed in the same orchestra &#8211; we would have been talking about 50 years. I also mentioned what I consider to be one of Paray&#8217;s greatest recordings &#8211; and what I consider to be a landmark early Mercury Stereo using the U47 / 201 layout at Old Orchestra Hall &#8211; the seemingly neglected Chausson Symphony which I have on the CD reissue catalogue number 434 389-2. The recently retired violinist told me that during his long career with the orchestra, he never recalls them ever having played the piece. Infact I have never heard or seen it ever programmed in Australia and can&#8217;t ever recall hearing any performance over the radio!</p>
<p>Anyway, I would just like to thank you for the excellent information and the excellent contributions you have made to the booklets in the latest Mercury reissues. Not a week has gone by in my house in the last 23 years without at least a couple of Mercury Living Presence recordings being played (just last night was the Saint-Saens Organ Symphony and the Mendelssohn / Chopin Cello Sonatas). Your parents may no longer be with us but it is true to say that they have had a profoundly positive effect on my life through their expert, tireless and concerted efforts in bringing true high fidelity sound into &#8220;home audiences&#8221; such as myself everywhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UPDATED:  Emory Cook, Binaural Recording Pioneer by Period Technology (a writer&#8217;s guide to the 60s) &#124; A Rain of Frogs</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5695#comment-161290</link>
		<dc:creator>Period Technology (a writer&#8217;s guide to the 60s) &#124; A Rain of Frogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5695#comment-161290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] (Audio Engineering Society), Chalk Hill Media Audio Museum,More on Emory Cook at Preservation SoundMore about the eccentricities of the phonograph record from Larry Robinson at [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Audio Engineering Society), Chalk Hill Media Audio Museum,More on Emory Cook at Preservation SoundMore about the eccentricities of the phonograph record from Larry Robinson at [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bridgeport, CT Circa 1964 by W.B.</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5357#comment-160958</link>
		<dc:creator>W.B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 01:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5357#comment-160958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Library of Congress has papers from the Columbia Bridgeport plant in terms of the many jobs they handled over the decades.  The cutoff date, if based on the papers, was late March 1964 (the most recent Columbia single to be pressed by that plant, according to a PDF file from LOC as to the contents of those papers, was 4-43022 which was released March 31, 1964; the latest LP to be pressed by them was around February of that year).  Many have erroneously cited the code &quot;CT&quot; as signifying the Bridgeport plant when, in fact, it was a code for Columbia&#039;s Terre Haute, IN plant (as was &#039;CTH&#039;).  (Besides, back when Columbia was pressing records in Bridgeport, the common abbreviation for the state was &#039;Conn.&#039;; &#039;CT&#039; was not used as a state abbreviation until starting in the later 1970&#039;s; furthermore, I saw a Bridgeport-pressed LP on United Artists from the early &#039;60&#039;s where, written on the deadwax, was the code &#039;CLB&#039;.)  Thereafter, all East Coast pressing was transferred to Pitman, NJ which began some pressing around Halloween 1960 and became more fully operational by May 1961.

A Billboard article from September of 1963 noted that Columbia was phasing out pressing operations in Bridgeport.  Given when the plant finally closed, this wind-down took six months.

At about the same time Bridgeport ended pressing operations, they also shut down a West Coast plant in Hollywood, CA (on Alden Drive) after a newer plant in Santa Maria, CA (which opened some time in late 1963 and would close in 1981) reached 100% online status in terms of pressing.  Thus, for a time in the late 1963/early &#039;64 period, Columbia operated five - count &#039;em, five - plants across the country.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Library of Congress has papers from the Columbia Bridgeport plant in terms of the many jobs they handled over the decades.  The cutoff date, if based on the papers, was late March 1964 (the most recent Columbia single to be pressed by that plant, according to a PDF file from LOC as to the contents of those papers, was 4-43022 which was released March 31, 1964; the latest LP to be pressed by them was around February of that year).  Many have erroneously cited the code &#8220;CT&#8221; as signifying the Bridgeport plant when, in fact, it was a code for Columbia&#8217;s Terre Haute, IN plant (as was &#8216;CTH&#8217;).  (Besides, back when Columbia was pressing records in Bridgeport, the common abbreviation for the state was &#8216;Conn.&#8217;; &#8216;CT&#8217; was not used as a state abbreviation until starting in the later 1970&#8242;s; furthermore, I saw a Bridgeport-pressed LP on United Artists from the early &#8217;60&#8242;s where, written on the deadwax, was the code &#8216;CLB&#8217;.)  Thereafter, all East Coast pressing was transferred to Pitman, NJ which began some pressing around Halloween 1960 and became more fully operational by May 1961.</p>
<p>A Billboard article from September of 1963 noted that Columbia was phasing out pressing operations in Bridgeport.  Given when the plant finally closed, this wind-down took six months.</p>
<p>At about the same time Bridgeport ended pressing operations, they also shut down a West Coast plant in Hollywood, CA (on Alden Drive) after a newer plant in Santa Maria, CA (which opened some time in late 1963 and would close in 1981) reached 100% online status in terms of pressing.  Thus, for a time in the late 1963/early &#8217;64 period, Columbia operated five &#8211; count &#8216;em, five &#8211; plants across the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bozak Compact Speakers of the 1970s by Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2305#comment-160092</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2305#comment-160092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am guessing what you describe as an amplifier inside is really the crossover unit that directs the correct freq. to the correct component.  

Best guess on the model is the B-302 Moorish]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am guessing what you describe as an amplifier inside is really the crossover unit that directs the correct freq. to the correct component.  </p>
<p>Best guess on the model is the B-302 Moorish</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Takin&#8217; em to Church (with Altec) by therealfonzie</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2991#comment-160000</link>
		<dc:creator>therealfonzie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 01:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2991#comment-160000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hammond is the least church organ sounding electronic organ ever built. I have never seen one in a Catholic, mainline or upscale evangelical church. 

 All church electronic organ vendors highly discouraged running a combined PA/organ system for a lot of reasons, both technical and business wise. A combined system needs about three times the total amplifier power and far more drivers and horns. Furthermore, few people understand both PA and organs very well so service becomes a challenge.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Hammond is the least church organ sounding electronic organ ever built. I have never seen one in a Catholic, mainline or upscale evangelical church. </p>
<p> All church electronic organ vendors highly discouraged running a combined PA/organ system for a lot of reasons, both technical and business wise. A combined system needs about three times the total amplifier power and far more drivers and horns. Furthermore, few people understand both PA and organs very well so service becomes a challenge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Publison Infernal Machine DHM 89 B2: Highly advanced signal processor/sampler c. 1978 by Ton Koenig</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-159790</link>
		<dc:creator>Ton Koenig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-159790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I passed up on Publison in 1991  for $800(regrets) but later bought its modern replacement..the Roland VP-9000.  Really cool device.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I passed up on Publison in 1991  for $800(regrets) but later bought its modern replacement..the Roland VP-9000.  Really cool device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tascam 144 4-Track c.1979: Original Catalog by Ton Koenig</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-159773</link>
		<dc:creator>Ton Koenig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-159773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And don&#039;t forget the much smaller Fostex X-15 4-track cassette recorder. A cute little number..ha ha.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And don&#8217;t forget the much smaller Fostex X-15 4-track cassette recorder. A cute little number..ha ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Takin&#8217; em to Church (with Altec) by bafflegab</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2991#comment-159662</link>
		<dc:creator>bafflegab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 23:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2991#comment-159662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a HOW document Altec put out on interfacing with Hammond, Allen, Rodgers and other brands of organs that would be most interesting reading. Hammond and Allen both depended on speaker modulating mechanical systems for their characteristic sounds, but others did not. 

 If you have a Leslie, if you aren&#039;t using it for guitar as well you aren&#039;t getting your money&#039;s worth!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a HOW document Altec put out on interfacing with Hammond, Allen, Rodgers and other brands of organs that would be most interesting reading. Hammond and Allen both depended on speaker modulating mechanical systems for their characteristic sounds, but others did not. </p>
<p> If you have a Leslie, if you aren&#8217;t using it for guitar as well you aren&#8217;t getting your money&#8217;s worth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Takin&#8217; em to Church (with Altec) by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2991#comment-159275</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 19:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2991#comment-159275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have one of the consoles pictured in the brochure. It is an Altec 250 T3. Still works excellent!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of the consoles pictured in the brochure. It is an Altec 250 T3. Still works excellent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RCA microphones catalog circa 1965 by Marc L'Esperance</title>
		<link>http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=1462#comment-159094</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc L'Esperance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 07:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=1462#comment-159094</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprised to see the KU-3A in such a late catalog! My favorite RCA ribbon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprised to see the KU-3A in such a late catalog! My favorite RCA ribbon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
