Comments on: 1953: What is High Fidelity? https://www.preservationsound.com/1953-what-is-high-fidelity/ information and ideas about audio history Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:56:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: rrusston https://www.preservationsound.com/1953-what-is-high-fidelity/#comment-17924 Mon, 02 Apr 2012 21:56:04 +0000 http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4605#comment-17924 There are still representational recordings being made, at no time has this ever stopped. This is the only tool we can use to ultimately determine what is _high fidelity_, although a great many tests have been devised to characterize or calibrate equipment to do their job in the chain to do so.

The problem is that not only has the overwhelming majority of the recording business ceased to produce representational recordings, but the majority of “the’hi-fi’ nuts”, or High End Audio buyers and vendors, have also largely abandoned this ideal.

Now, they want what they feel sounds best to them at any given time and under any given circumstance. The problem is, ears lie.

Our sense of hearing is the most subjective sense we have and varies more than any other with every imaginable variable. When ABX testing revealed this, ABX testing was declared Blasphemy.

Both the recording and playback of audio have become Established Religions, with creeds, statements of belief, and ecclesiastical courts to suppress Heresy, Blasphemy and acts of anathema.

Considering all that, it’s still a fun hobby to drill holes in metal chassis, solder wires and stuff up in odd ways, put on odd parts and when it actually makes a sound feel the same thrill people felt in 1953, isn’t it?

]]>