<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 1965: Early Wireless Microphones	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/1965-early-wireless-microphones/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1965-early-wireless-microphones/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 03:59:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Roberta X		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1965-early-wireless-microphones/#comment-151083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberta X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 03:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6417#comment-151083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nope, those mixers are Collins 212-Z, the nearly-indestructible field mixer.  Maybe it&#039;s the metal knobs, but it seems like more of those have survived than anything else.  The RCA OP-07 was twice the size, the Gates units were not as solid and only the rich stations got Western Electric.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, those mixers are Collins 212-Z, the nearly-indestructible field mixer.  Maybe it&#8217;s the metal knobs, but it seems like more of those have survived than anything else.  The RCA OP-07 was twice the size, the Gates units were not as solid and only the rich stations got Western Electric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
