<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 1978: Pete Townshend &#8216;Boogies&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:22:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ellis Dee		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-609867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellis Dee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2021 20:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7516#comment-609867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your thoughts are not important.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your thoughts are not important.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-217203</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 20:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7516#comment-217203</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-211555&quot;&gt;Carl&lt;/a&gt;.

If I remember it was exactly the same amp as their bass power head with RCA connectors and a different faceplate. That would make sense actually. 

  I think whereas most Boogies used Schumacher transformers these used a Mercury Magnetics design, perhaps the famous VTO-100 that was a clone of a Radford part.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-211555">Carl</a>.</p>
<p>If I remember it was exactly the same amp as their bass power head with RCA connectors and a different faceplate. That would make sense actually. </p>
<p>  I think whereas most Boogies used Schumacher transformers these used a Mercury Magnetics design, perhaps the famous VTO-100 that was a clone of a Radford part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: phillip holmes		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-216231</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[phillip holmes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2013 05:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7516#comment-216231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hate the name too.  And Mesa Boogie sounds like a bunch of native Americans, high on peyote, playing really bad R&#038;B, on top of a mesa, somewhere in the southwest, probably transported there by space aliens with bad tastes in music.  And sponsored by Budweiser.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate the name too.  And Mesa Boogie sounds like a bunch of native Americans, high on peyote, playing really bad R&amp;B, on top of a mesa, somewhere in the southwest, probably transported there by space aliens with bad tastes in music.  And sponsored by Budweiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carl		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-211555</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7516#comment-211555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How bout &#039;Baron.&#039; That&#039;s what they called a hi-fi amp they sold in the 90s. Beautiful amp, and a bargain, too. $3500, IIRC. I think it was Mesa&#039;s only venture into that market.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How bout &#8216;Baron.&#8217; That&#8217;s what they called a hi-fi amp they sold in the 90s. Beautiful amp, and a bargain, too. $3500, IIRC. I think it was Mesa&#8217;s only venture into that market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Danwedge		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-206102</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danwedge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7516#comment-206102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-206100&quot;&gt;Danwedge&lt;/a&gt;.

That should read Dookie files.  iPad doesn&#039;t know what dookie is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-206100">Danwedge</a>.</p>
<p>That should read Dookie files.  iPad doesn&#8217;t know what dookie is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Danwedge		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-206100</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Danwedge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7516#comment-206100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s just a word hoss, calm down!  I&#039;ve got a mark IIb and love it.  The clean channel is amazing, esp with some Philips 7581&#039;s.  Actually I&#039;ve never been a fan of the word Boogie either...but I certainly didn&#039;t need to read Berry&#039;s rookie files!  Again! :0]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s just a word hoss, calm down!  I&#8217;ve got a mark IIb and love it.  The clean channel is amazing, esp with some Philips 7581&#8217;s.  Actually I&#8217;ve never been a fan of the word Boogie either&#8230;but I certainly didn&#8217;t need to read Berry&#8217;s rookie files!  Again! :0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: iarock		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comment-205765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[iarock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2013 22:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7516#comment-205765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s face it: If you can&#039;t play Chuck Berry you can&#039;t play rock and roll.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s face it: If you can&#8217;t play Chuck Berry you can&#8217;t play rock and roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
