<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 1981: Battle of the &#8217;55s	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/1981-battle-of-the-55s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1981-battle-of-the-55s/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:51:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Johannes		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1981-battle-of-the-55s/#comment-18921</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Johannes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 04:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4636#comment-18921</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[... not so much by &quot;contemporary&quot; artists, but by some heroes of New Wave, contemporarily considered to be &quot;cool&quot; again. Among those as quoted from vintagesynth.com: Joy Division, New Order, Cocteau Twins, The Cure, Sisters Of Mercy, Depeche Mode. Enough reasons to push the price I guess.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; not so much by &#8220;contemporary&#8221; artists, but by some heroes of New Wave, contemporarily considered to be &#8220;cool&#8221; again. Among those as quoted from vintagesynth.com: Joy Division, New Order, Cocteau Twins, The Cure, Sisters Of Mercy, Depeche Mode. Enough reasons to push the price I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
