<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: An Absurd Tape Duplication Scheme c. 1950	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:41:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-141673</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 18:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6229#comment-141673</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-141627&quot;&gt;Angie&lt;/a&gt;.

nice one Angie!  and you do wire transfers!  welcome.  c.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-141627">Angie</a>.</p>
<p>nice one Angie!  and you do wire transfers!  welcome.  c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Angie		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-141627</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6229#comment-141627</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a lady. I&#039;m a nerd.  We&#039;re out here!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a lady. I&#8217;m a nerd.  We&#8217;re out here!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 03:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6229#comment-136987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;That&#039;s no lady, that&#039;s my wife!&quot;   


 The question of why women are not into this stuff is one that many ask. They just aren&#039;t. 

 I&#039;ve known female electronic engineers. They were quite competent, but if something didn&#039;t pertain to their job or to some specific purpose they had to accomplish, they were not particularly interested.  That&#039;s the province of nerds, who are almost all male.

 Vive le difference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That&#8217;s no lady, that&#8217;s my wife!&#8221;   </p>
<p> The question of why women are not into this stuff is one that many ask. They just aren&#8217;t. </p>
<p> I&#8217;ve known female electronic engineers. They were quite competent, but if something didn&#8217;t pertain to their job or to some specific purpose they had to accomplish, they were not particularly interested.  That&#8217;s the province of nerds, who are almost all male.</p>
<p> Vive le difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136968</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 03:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6229#comment-136968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[my literary voice is perhaps an acquired taste.  thanks for the suggestion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my literary voice is perhaps an acquired taste.  thanks for the suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: smokris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smokris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 02:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6229#comment-136951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136880&quot;&gt;chris&lt;/a&gt;.

Ha.  Thanks for your consideration of us non-Duderinos, Chris.  (And thanks for the fascinating ongoing history lessons!)

My experience (having worked with a number of audio enthusiasts who are women) has been that acknowledging the possibility that they might exist (or, at least, not assuming that they don&#039;t exist) goes a long way toward making them feel welcomed.  (And also avoiding the word &quot;lady&quot; which some consider derogatory.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136880">chris</a>.</p>
<p>Ha.  Thanks for your consideration of us non-Duderinos, Chris.  (And thanks for the fascinating ongoing history lessons!)</p>
<p>My experience (having worked with a number of audio enthusiasts who are women) has been that acknowledging the possibility that they might exist (or, at least, not assuming that they don&#8217;t exist) goes a long way toward making them feel welcomed.  (And also avoiding the word &#8220;lady&#8221; which some consider derogatory.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6229#comment-136880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136600&quot;&gt;smokris&lt;/a&gt;.

ahh got it.  via J Lebowski / IE &#039;not a term anyone would self-apply&#039;

will keep this in mind

c.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136600">smokris</a>.</p>
<p>ahh got it.  via J Lebowski / IE &#8216;not a term anyone would self-apply&#8217;</p>
<p>will keep this in mind</p>
<p>c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: smokris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smokris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6229#comment-136600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Read on and learn, dudes (VIA is there a lady?  Do any women read this nonsense?  if so, pls speak up thanks).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Some people read this who don&#039;t respond to the hail &quot;dudes&quot;.   Suggestions: &quot;people&quot;, &quot;readers&quot;, &quot;audio history enthusiasts&quot;, &quot;y&#039;all&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Read on and learn, dudes (VIA is there a lady?  Do any women read this nonsense?  if so, pls speak up thanks).</p></blockquote>
<p>Some people read this who don&#8217;t respond to the hail &#8220;dudes&#8221;.   Suggestions: &#8220;people&#8221;, &#8220;readers&#8221;, &#8220;audio history enthusiasts&#8221;, &#8220;y&#8217;all&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Wayne		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-absurd-tape-duplication-scheme-c-1950/#comment-136083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 06:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6229#comment-136083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not that crazy.  Same principle as used for contact printing of motion picture release prints.  That method worked very well, and was the de facto  means of duplication for 70+ years.  In theory, under the right circumstances, should work for mag tracks as well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that crazy.  Same principle as used for contact printing of motion picture release prints.  That method worked very well, and was the de facto  means of duplication for 70+ years.  In theory, under the right circumstances, should work for mag tracks as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
