<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Better Living Through Auto-Reverse	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/better-living-through-auto-reverse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/better-living-through-auto-reverse/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/better-living-through-auto-reverse/#comment-143986</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2750#comment-143986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/better-living-through-auto-reverse/#comment-143984&quot;&gt;Tom Fine&lt;/a&gt;.

haha yeah i had forgotten about this one.  I teach a class at the Uni called &#039;television commercials&#039; so I tend to be very keyed-in to /product benefit/ vs /consumer benefit/ as expressed in advertising narratives.  Man i suuuuuuuuure wish I had kept a 1700. I had like three of those fkkrs at one point!  Sold &#039;em all a decade ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/better-living-through-auto-reverse/#comment-143984">Tom Fine</a>.</p>
<p>haha yeah i had forgotten about this one.  I teach a class at the Uni called &#8216;television commercials&#8217; so I tend to be very keyed-in to /product benefit/ vs /consumer benefit/ as expressed in advertising narratives.  Man i suuuuuuuuure wish I had kept a 1700. I had like three of those fkkrs at one point!  Sold &#8217;em all a decade ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Fine		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/better-living-through-auto-reverse/#comment-143984</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Fine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2750#comment-143984</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chris, this is one of your better posts! The ad is awesome! I had a Pioneer RT-707 and made some good 3-hour party tapes (3.5IPS, 1800&#039;, quarter-track) in my day. I never bought into the splice-together MO for party tapes, mainly because it don&#039;t work for quarter-track. I had a Numark &quot;DJ&quot; mixer and two Technics SL-D2 turntables, so I could &quot;be my own radio station.&quot; Thankfully, I spared myself future embarrassment by foregoing the temptation do add my voice to the mix! I probably still have some of the auto-reverse foil tabs around here.

The ultimate auto-reverse deck was the Technics RS-1700. One of those things with 3600&#039; of 3.75IPS quarter-track love nest muzak could make for a LONG night.

-- Tom Fine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, this is one of your better posts! The ad is awesome! I had a Pioneer RT-707 and made some good 3-hour party tapes (3.5IPS, 1800&#8242;, quarter-track) in my day. I never bought into the splice-together MO for party tapes, mainly because it don&#8217;t work for quarter-track. I had a Numark &#8220;DJ&#8221; mixer and two Technics SL-D2 turntables, so I could &#8220;be my own radio station.&#8221; Thankfully, I spared myself future embarrassment by foregoing the temptation do add my voice to the mix! I probably still have some of the auto-reverse foil tabs around here.</p>
<p>The ultimate auto-reverse deck was the Technics RS-1700. One of those things with 3600&#8242; of 3.75IPS quarter-track love nest muzak could make for a LONG night.</p>
<p>&#8212; Tom Fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: smokah-dehookah		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/better-living-through-auto-reverse/#comment-143893</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[smokah-dehookah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2750#comment-143893</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My dad was divorced in &#039;66 or so and his solution to romance music for his swingin&#039; bachelor pad -it was a highrise apartment building in Chicago&#039;s Loop, and was furnished about like the one in &lt;i&gt;Down With Love&lt;/i&gt;, the Ewan McGregor/ Renee Zellweger rom com- was a Sansui receiver with a modification to receive the SCA background music they had on a subcarrier from a local FM. 

 Laugh if you will, but he got laid a lot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dad was divorced in &#8217;66 or so and his solution to romance music for his swingin&#8217; bachelor pad -it was a highrise apartment building in Chicago&#8217;s Loop, and was furnished about like the one in <i>Down With Love</i>, the Ewan McGregor/ Renee Zellweger rom com- was a Sansui receiver with a modification to receive the SCA background music they had on a subcarrier from a local FM. </p>
<p> Laugh if you will, but he got laid a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
