<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guitar Equipment &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/category/guitar-equipment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2014 14:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Kinda Miss My Camaro</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/kinda-miss-my-camaro/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/kinda-miss-my-camaro/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuzzface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar effects]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[About 10 years ago I had a dark purple 1986 Camaro Berlinetta with a 305 and the digital &#8216;knight rider&#8217; instrumentation panel.  I bought it for $775 (only 83k miles!) from an old lady who grumbled, &#8220;don&#8217;t kill yourself Don Johnson&#8221; as she handed me the keys.  Except for one odd incident in which the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CamaroFuzzTopCC-copy.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7984" alt="CamaroFuzzTopCC copy" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CamaroFuzzTopCC-copy.jpg" width="1531" height="1422" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CamaroFuzzTopCC-copy.jpg 1531w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CamaroFuzzTopCC-copy-300x278.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CamaroFuzzTopCC-copy-1024x951.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1531px) 100vw, 1531px" /></a>About 10 years ago I had a <a href="http://media.caranddriver.com/ez/images/reviews/comparisons/archive/1985_chevrolet_camaro_berlinetta_vs._ford_mustang_svo-archived_comparison/gallery/1985_chevrolet_camaro_berlinetta_photo_22/3548395-1-eng-US/1985_chevrolet_camaro_berlinetta_4_cd_gallery_zoomed.jpg" target="_blank">dark purple 1986 Camaro Berlinetta</a> with a 305 and the <a href="http://www.zorly.com/images_camaro/09-10-08/1984%20Berlinetta%20Starship%20Console%20-%20berlinetta.jpg" target="_blank">digital &#8216;knight rider&#8217; instrumentation pane</a>l.  I bought it for $775 (only 83k miles!) from an old lady who grumbled, &#8220;don&#8217;t kill yourself Don Johnson&#8221; as she handed me the keys.  Except for one odd incident in which the car <em>would simply not turn off, </em> it was 100% reliable and I loved driving it.  I sadly had to sell it because I lost the parking space it slept in.  I was poking around the ole MacBook today trying to find some pics of it, and there ain&#8217;t even one!  I guess that 2005 was maybe riiiiiiiight before the era of ubiquitous photography of every single fkkn facet our goddamn lives, and maybe I&#8217;m better off for it.  Maybe Camaro is just better off living in my midnight-blue tinted memories.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Camro_Fuzz_inside.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7985" alt="Camro_Fuzz_inside" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Camro_Fuzz_inside.jpg" width="1621" height="1233" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Camro_Fuzz_inside.jpg 1621w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Camro_Fuzz_inside-300x228.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Camro_Fuzz_inside-1024x778.jpg 1024w" sizes="(max-width: 1621px) 100vw, 1621px" /></a>While I couldn&#8217;t find any Camaro car pics on the laptop, I did stumble on the above-depicted germanium Fuzz Face &#8216;clone&#8217; that I decorated with a mid-seventies Camaro badge.  I buy these old chrome auto badges in lots at the flea market; if yr patient, you can get em for a buck or two each.  Anyhow, this is one of the only guitar pedals that I ever built and it turned out great, despite the fact that I simply used whatever old NOS RCA germanium PNP transistors I had around, without so much as even looking at the data sheets.  I just tried a few different types until the thing sounded like a Fuzz Face, and voila.  One cool detail: in the image above, check out the massive mil-type chassis-mount oil cap (far left) that I used as the output coupling cap.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/fuzzfacepnpschematic-copy.gif"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7986" alt="fuzzfacepnpschematic copy" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/fuzzfacepnpschematic-copy.gif" width="353" height="271" /></a><br />
Above is the very simple schematic that I apparently pulled from <a href="http://fuzzcentral.ssguitar.com/" target="_blank">FuzzCentral</a>.  Much like my Camaro (the car), my Camaro (the fuzz) was sold off many years back, and yeah I kinda miss it.  Can&#8217;t keep em all&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/kinda-miss-my-camaro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kustom &#038; Kasino in the 70s: Part II</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/kustom-kasino-in-the-70s-part-ii/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/kustom-kasino-in-the-70s-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 12:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar amps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kustom]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7827</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Today at PS dot com: a few images of the &#8216;later&#8217; Kustom amps, as well as a forgotten entry by sister-company Kasino.  Above:  the 1972 Kustom Hustler, Charger, Sidewinder, Commander, and Challenger amps.   I think someone had a thing for muscle cars back in the day,,,  ironic, considering that dude later went into business making [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7830" alt="Kustom_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972-628x1024.jpg" width="628" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972-628x1024.jpg 628w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972-184x300.jpg 184w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972.jpg 928w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 628px) 100vw, 628px" /></a>Today at PS dot com: a few images of the &#8216;later&#8217; Kustom amps, as well as a forgotten entry by sister-company Kasino.  Above:  the 1972 Kustom Hustler, Charger, Sidewinder, Commander, and Challenger amps.   I think someone had a thing for muscle cars back in the day,,,  ironic, considering that dude later went into business making police radar detectors.  Oh wait: you don&#8217;t know the crazy story of Kustom founder Bud Ross?  You might want to check out <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=1913" target="_blank">our earlier article about Kustom at this link&#8230; including our exclusive high-res download of the complete 1972 Kustom Katalog</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972-copy.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7829" alt="Kustom_1972 copy" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972-copy-614x1024.jpg" width="614" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972-copy-614x1024.jpg 614w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kustom_1972-copy-180x300.jpg 180w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 614px) 100vw, 614px" /></a>Above: this advert uses the non-literal communication method known as SIMILE to suggest that &#8216;Kustom amps are as precision-made as surgical instruments.&#8217;  There is also a parallel structure that relates a musician&#8217;s &#8216;picking&#8217; of a guitar-string to a surgeon&#8217;s &#8216;picking&#8217; of a cyst/tumor/etc.  Aii yi yi.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kasino_PA_1972.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7828" alt="Kasino_PA_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kasino_PA_1972-1024x702.png" width="640" height="438" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kasino_PA_1972-1024x702.png 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kasino_PA_1972-300x205.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/Kasino_PA_1972.png 1463w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Above: a Kasino PA system from 1972.  Kasino products were apparently the same circuitry as Kustom, but repackaged to as to allow different local dealers to carry the same products without competing directly.  Much like Gibson/Epiphone in the 1960s.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/KustomAmps_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7831" alt="KustomAmps_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/KustomAmps_1977-806x1024.jpg" width="640" height="813" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/KustomAmps_1977-806x1024.jpg 806w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/KustomAmps_1977-236x300.jpg 236w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/KustomAmps_1977.jpg 1594w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Above: the third generation of Kustom amps circa 1977.  The big selling point here seems to be&#8230;  a wide-Q notch filter.  Yawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/kustom-kasino-in-the-70s-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Travis Bean: 70&#8217;s Guitar Icons</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/travis-bean-70s-guitar-icons/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/travis-bean-70s-guitar-icons/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travis Bean]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There are not a lot of 70&#8217;s guitars that have attained classic status. 1970&#8217;s Gibsons and Fenders have a checkered reputation, and while a select few 70&#8217;s Ibanez and Yamaha models are highly valued, most Japanese electric guitars of the decade are fairly poor in quality compared to what we would come to see in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7809" alt="Travis_Bean_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977.jpg" width="925" height="956" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977.jpg 925w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977-290x300.jpg 290w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 925px) 100vw, 925px" /></a>There are not a lot of 70&#8217;s guitars that have attained classic status. 1970&#8217;s Gibsons and Fenders have a checkered reputation, and while a select few 70&#8217;s Ibanez and Yamaha models are highly valued, most Japanese electric guitars of the decade are fairly poor in quality compared to what we would come to see in the 1980s.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/TravisBean_TB1000_1976.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="wp-image-7810 alignleft" alt="TravisBean_TB1000_1976" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/TravisBean_TB1000_1976-267x1024.jpg" width="160" height="614" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/TravisBean_TB1000_1976-267x1024.jpg 267w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/TravisBean_TB1000_1976-78x300.jpg 78w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/TravisBean_TB1000_1976.jpg 429w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 160px) 100vw, 160px" /></a>A notable standout is the Travis Bean.  Regularly trading in the $3000 -$5000 range, these guitars have enjoyed a very strong reputation since their introduction. Travis Beans feature an aluminum neck and high-quality construction.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977-copy.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-7808 alignright" alt="Travis_Bean_1977 copy" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977-copy-777x1024.jpg" width="384" height="506" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977-copy-777x1024.jpg 777w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977-copy-227x300.jpg 227w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Travis_Bean_1977-copy.jpg 1367w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 384px) 100vw, 384px" /></a>**************************</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Any Travis Bean players or collectors out there?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4804" target="_blank">Click here for previous Travis Bean TB1000 coverage on PS dot com</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6462" target="_blank">Also here</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7509" target="_blank">More 70&#8217;s aluminum-neck guitar-geekery </a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/travis-bean-70s-guitar-icons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maestro FX units of 1972</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/maestro-fx-units-of-1972/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/maestro-fx-units-of-1972/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maestro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tape echo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Today at PS dot com: just a quick look at some of the state-of-the-art in guitar/keyboard FX of 1972, courtesy the Maestro division of Chicago Musical Instruments, also parent to the Gibson brand of instruments.  Maestro made a lot wackier stuff than even the above-depicted Rover (a mini-leslie-on-a-stick) &#8211; Rhythm and Sound, anyone? &#8211; and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7800" alt="Maestro_Rover_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972-799x1024.jpg" width="640" height="820" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972-799x1024.jpg 799w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972-234x300.jpg 234w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972.jpg 1613w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Today at PS dot com: just a quick look at some of the state-of-the-art in guitar/keyboard FX of 1972, courtesy the Maestro division of Chicago Musical Instruments, also parent to the Gibson brand of instruments.  Maestro made a lot wackier stuff than even the above-depicted Rover (a mini-leslie-on-a-stick) &#8211; <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Maestro_1969.jpg" target="_blank">Rhythm and Sound, anyone?</a> &#8211; and we&#8217;ll get to it all eventually.  <em>There&#8217;s only so much past I can write about, people&#8230;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7801" alt="Maestro_sustainer_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972-496x1024.jpg" width="496" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972-496x1024.jpg 496w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972-145x300.jpg 145w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972.jpg 980w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 496px) 100vw, 496px" /></a>Above: This does not appear to be a legitimate doctor. At best, he will likely &#8216;goose&#8217; you whilst you are subdued via anesthesia.  I don&#8217;t really understand why a sleazy physician makes a good metaphor for a compression pedal.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Fuzztone_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7798" alt="Maestro_Fuzztone_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Fuzztone_1972-502x1024.jpg" width="502" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Fuzztone_1972-502x1024.jpg 502w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Fuzztone_1972-147x300.jpg 147w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 502px) 100vw, 502px" /></a>Above: SuperFuzz.  It&#8217;s like a smug cop.  Ok&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_RingMod_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7799" alt="Maestro_RingMod_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_RingMod_1972-470x1024.jpg" width="470" height="1024" /></a>Above: the Maestro Ring Modulator.  This is a rare one, I believe.  Do you get the feeling that this advert tells NOTHING about what this thing actually sounds like, other than it makes &#8216;unheard of sounds?&#8217;  This is likely because ring mod is really very hard to describe in words, and its effects really can be incredibly varied.  It actually synthesizes new pitches by outputting the sum and difference (in hertz) of your monophonic performance input and some second signal &#8211; in this case, likely an internal &#8216;carrier&#8217; oscillator whose pitch is determined by the panel fader there.  I love ring mod.  It&#8217;s great that a few companies (Moog, EH) are making ring mod pedals again. A truly wild sound with a ton of applications for modern music.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7796" alt="Echoplex_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972-792x1024.jpg" width="640" height="827" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972-792x1024.jpg 792w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972-232x300.jpg 232w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972.jpg 1646w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Above: The Echoplex line of 1972.  The EM-1, ES-2, and EP-3.  Better than hanging out in a trash can.  Kinda need one of these.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7797" alt="Maestro_Brassmaster_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972-519x1024.jpg" width="519" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972-519x1024.jpg 519w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972-152x300.jpg 152w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972.jpg 1026w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 519px) 100vw, 519px" /></a>Above: The Bass Brassmaster.  Tuba/trombone/bass sax players end up homeless/hobos/vagrants as a result.  Great, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/maestro-fx-units-of-1972/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is an actual, published Gibson advert from 1986</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/this-is-an-actual-published-gibson-advert-from-1986/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/this-is-an-actual-published-gibson-advert-from-1986/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Nov 2013 18:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gibson]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good lord.  Here it is.  A dispatch from the absolute nadir of the Gibson musical instrument company.  This comp resembles nothing so much as this piece of graphic-design genius earlier described on this site.  Who would have guessed that this company, responsible for the best electric and acoustic guitars of the 20th century, would have [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1986.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7624" alt="Gibson_1986" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1986.jpg" width="901" height="916" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1986.jpg 901w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1986-295x300.jpg 295w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 901px) 100vw, 901px" /></a>Good lord.  Here it is.  A dispatch from the absolute nadir of the Gibson musical instrument company.  This comp resembles nothing so much as<a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5739" target="_blank"> this piece of graphic-design genius earlier described</a> on this site.  Who would have guessed that this company, responsible for the best electric and acoustic guitars of the 20th century, would have fallen so low?  And even more surprising: that they bounced back in a mere 20 years, becoming the behemoth that they are today?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1988.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7623" alt="Gibson_1988" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1988-766x1024.jpg" width="640" height="855" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1988-766x1024.jpg 766w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1988-224x300.jpg 224w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Gibson_1988.jpg 1582w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Two years later (1988 &#8211; above), Gibson was back to running full-page ads (this one&#8217;s for you, RR&#8230;).  Note the hilarious high-school-notebook-style illustration work which attempts to position Gibson above &#8220;NoName, NoTone, Yamawho (Yamaha), Cartel (Charvel), IBenHad (Ibanez), Kromer (Kramer &#8211; ???), and Blender (again, don&#8217;t really get how this is a dig).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/this-is-an-actual-published-gibson-advert-from-1986/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>1977: Guild-Distributed HH amps and effects</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1977-guild-distributed-hh-amps-and-effects/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/1977-guild-distributed-hh-amps-and-effects/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 20:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HH]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laney]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7520</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HH was one of the earliest UK-makers of solid-state sound-reinforcement kit.  They were bought-out by Laney many years back.  Read all about &#8217;em here! BTW, these look very very similar to Farfisa&#8217;s 1970s line of PA and instrument amps.  Is there a connection? Also this:  (70&#8217;s users of this kit).  Amazing. And WTF.  ultimate high-school [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_amps_effects_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7521" alt="HH_amps_effects_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_amps_effects_1977-803x1024.jpg" width="640" height="816" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_amps_effects_1977-803x1024.jpg 803w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_amps_effects_1977-235x300.jpg 235w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_amps_effects_1977.jpg 1039w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>HH was one of the earliest UK-makers of solid-state sound-reinforcement kit.  They were bought-out by Laney many years back.  <a href="http://www.hhamplification.co.uk/history.asp" target="_blank">Read all about &#8217;em here!</a> BTW, these look very very similar to Farfisa&#8217;s 1970s line of PA and instrument amps.  Is there a connection?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_text_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7522" alt="HH_text_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_text_1977-1024x420.jpg" width="640" height="262" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_text_1977-1024x420.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_text_1977-300x123.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/HH_text_1977.jpg 1581w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Also this:  <a href="http://www.hhamplification.co.uk/gallerypic.asp?bigpics=dbfiles/gallery/006.jpg" target="_blank">(70&#8217;s users of this kit).  Amazing.</a></p>
<p>And WTF.  <a href="http://www.hhamplification.co.uk/gallerypic.asp?bigpics=dbfiles/gallery/005-2.jpg" target="_blank">ultimate high-school dance via HH kit</a>.  good lord.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/1977-guild-distributed-hh-amps-and-effects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The HUSTLER Guitar (via Technikraft of Illinois) c. 1979</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-hustler-guitar-via-technikraft-of-illinois-c-1979/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-hustler-guitar-via-technikraft-of-illinois-c-1979/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 11:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hustler]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1979: The &#8216;Hustler,&#8217; a little-known entry in the &#8216;aluminum-neck&#8217; race of the 1970s (see also: Kramer, Veleno, Travis Bean).  Anyone?   Apparently it has a hollow fiberglass body, and at least two years ago it was tough to move at $300!   Seems like it could give some unique sounds,,,,]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hustler_Gtr_1979.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7510" alt="Hustler_Gtr_1979" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hustler_Gtr_1979-526x1024.jpg" width="526" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hustler_Gtr_1979-526x1024.jpg 526w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hustler_Gtr_1979-154x300.jpg 154w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hustler_Gtr_1979.jpg 953w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 526px) 100vw, 526px" /></a>1979: The &#8216;Hustler,&#8217; a little-known entry in the &#8216;aluminum-neck&#8217; race of the 1970s (see also: <a href="http://www.vintagekramer.com/alum.htm" target="_blank">Kramer</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veleno_%28guitar%29" target="_blank">Veleno</a>, <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4804" target="_blank">Travis Bean</a>).  Anyone?   Apparently it has a hollow fiberglass body, and at least two years ago it was <a href="http://www.reranch.com/reranch/viewtopic.php?t=39461&amp;sid=f40ec520835e42a2e34dc9b63ff77efd" target="_blank">tough to move at $300</a>!   Seems like it could give some unique sounds,,,,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-hustler-guitar-via-technikraft-of-illinois-c-1979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>1978: Pete Townshend &#8216;Boogies&#8217;</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2013 20:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mesa-boogie]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7516</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Goddamnit I hate that word.  &#8216;Boogie.&#8217;  Yuck.  Instantly brings to mind brain-dead root-fifth/root-sixth endless nonsense non-songs.   Really sounds like s$%t.   And you do know that boogie-riff inventor chuck berry was later famous for&#8230; NSFW)  Eii Yii Yii.   I wonder if Mesa Engineering would sell more units if they dropped that word.  Cause they sure [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/PeteTownshend_Boogie_1978.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7517" alt="PeteTownshend_Boogie_1978" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/PeteTownshend_Boogie_1978-1024x800.jpg" width="640" height="500" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/PeteTownshend_Boogie_1978-1024x800.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/PeteTownshend_Boogie_1978-300x234.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/PeteTownshend_Boogie_1978.jpg 1279w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Goddamnit I hate that word.  &#8216;Boogie.&#8217;  Yuck.  Instantly brings to mind brain-dead root-fifth/root-sixth endless nonsense non-songs.   Really sounds like s$%t.   And you do know that boogie-riff inventor <a href="http://www.vice.com/read/the-perversions-of-chuck-berry-876109-v20n9?Contentpage=-1" target="_blank">chuck berry was later famous for&#8230; NSFW)</a>  Eii Yii Yii.   I wonder if Mesa Engineering would sell more units if they dropped that word.  Cause they sure ain&#8217;t bad amps.   But boogie!  No thank you! Never!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/1978-pete-townshend-boogies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The HiWatt Bulldog Combo amp c. 1978</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-hiwatt-bulldog-combo-amp-c-1978/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-hiwatt-bulldog-combo-amp-c-1978/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 10:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiwatt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mesa]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1978: The HIWATT 100-watt Bulldog combo amp offers a challenge to Mesa/Boogie in 1978.  These must have been very rare; I can&#8217;t find a single one online.  Read all about them at this link.   The &#8216;mini-monster&#8217; hi-powered-combo concept was introduced by Mesa/Boogie in the late 60s when Randall Smith modded a Fender Princeton by adding [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hiwatt_Bulldog_1978.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7497" alt="Hiwatt_Bulldog_1978" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hiwatt_Bulldog_1978-715x1024.jpg" width="640" height="916" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hiwatt_Bulldog_1978-715x1024.jpg 715w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hiwatt_Bulldog_1978-209x300.jpg 209w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Hiwatt_Bulldog_1978.jpg 931w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>1978: The HIWATT 100-watt Bulldog combo amp offers a challenge to Mesa/Boogie in 1978.  These must have been very rare; I can&#8217;t find a single one online.  <a href="http://hiwatt.org/HiwattStory/index-4.html" target="_blank">Read all about them at this link</a>.   The &#8216;mini-monster&#8217; hi-powered-combo concept was introduced by Mesa/Boogie in the late 60s when Randall Smith modded a Fender Princeton by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesa_Boogie" target="_blank">adding the power supply and output section from a Bassman</a>, essentially making a little tiny (but heavy!) 50-watt combo amp.  Curious about exactly how much of a &#8216;feat&#8217; this was, I actually did this very thing many years ago to my brother&#8217;s Silverface Princeton.  A decade on, the thing is still cooking.  The perfect &#8216;vintage&#8217; amp for NYC, or any city where you&#8217;ve gotta share a taxi to the gig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-hiwatt-bulldog-combo-amp-c-1978/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>This thing is fkkn crazy.  The FROGG Compu-Sound c. 1977</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/this-thing-is-fkkn-crazy-the-frogg-compu-sound-c-1977/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/this-thing-is-fkkn-crazy-the-frogg-compu-sound-c-1977/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FROGG]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7493</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Holy WTF.  Also, it&#8217;s basically a filter with an envelope follower.  But WTF.  Read all about at this dude&#8217;s website.  Watch the video.  And yea it sounds pretty neat.  Only 100 ever made, apparently.  And unsurprisingly.  And goodnight.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Frogg_Compu_Sound_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7494" alt="Frogg_Compu_Sound_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Frogg_Compu_Sound_1977.jpg" width="926" height="925" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Frogg_Compu_Sound_1977.jpg 926w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Frogg_Compu_Sound_1977-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Frogg_Compu_Sound_1977-300x300.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 926px) 100vw, 926px" /></a>Holy WTF.  Also, it&#8217;s basically a filter with an envelope follower.  But WTF.  <a href="http://emailtom.org/2011/05/02/compu-sound/" target="_blank">Read all about at this dude&#8217;s website.</a>  Watch the video.  And yea it sounds pretty neat.  Only 100 ever made, apparently.  And unsurprisingly.  And goodnight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/this-thing-is-fkkn-crazy-the-frogg-compu-sound-c-1977/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
