<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Technical &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/category/technical/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 16:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Bell Labs&#8217; Electro-Mechanical &#8216;Speech Synthesizer&#8217; circa 1951</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/bell-labs-electro-mechanical-speech-synthesizer-circa-1951/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/bell-labs-electro-mechanical-speech-synthesizer-circa-1951/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 23:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Synthesizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bell labs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=9477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[**update 07.09.21 &#8211; audio clip added! see below! you can now HEAR this monstrosity!** Download a 4PP article (+advert) from the June 1951 RADIO ELECTRONICS on the subject of a novel (+fairly creepy) electro-mechanical speech-synthesizer designed by Bell Labs. This has got to be one of the wildest electro-mechanical synths every created. I wonder what [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" width="981" height="1024" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_voco-981x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9478" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_voco-981x1024.jpg 981w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_voco-287x300.jpg 287w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_voco-768x802.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_voco-1471x1536.jpg 1471w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_voco-1961x2048.jpg 1961w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_voco-1200x1253.jpg 1200w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_voco-1980x2068.jpg 1980w" sizes="(max-width: 981px) 100vw, 981px" /></figure>



<p>**update 07.09.21 &#8211; audio clip added!  see below!  you can now HEAR this monstrosity!**</p>



<p>Download a 4PP article (+advert) from the June 1951 RADIO ELECTRONICS on the subject of a novel (+fairly creepy) electro-mechanical speech-synthesizer designed by Bell Labs.</p>



<div class="wp-block-file"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech-Vocoder-1951.pdf">Bell Labs Speech Synthesizer 1951</a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech-Vocoder-1951.pdf" class="wp-block-file__button" download>Download</a></div>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="767" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1-1024x767.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9480" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1-1024x767.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1-768x575.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1-1536x1150.jpg 1536w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1-2048x1534.jpg 2048w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1-1200x899.jpg 1200w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1-1980x1483.jpg 1980w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<p>This has got to be one of the wildest electro-mechanical synths every created.  I wonder what New Jersey basement it ended up in.  I&#8217;m preeeeetty sure that this abomination provided the historical-basis for the device that Tony Shaloub&#8217;s character was developing in the first season of The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel.  Anyhow.  It&#8217;s weird and far-out and I think you will enjoy reading about it. </p>



<p>T.F. provided us with this audio clip so that you can hear this device in action.  it&#8217;s pretty remarkable TBH&#8230;</p>



<figure class="wp-block-audio"><audio controls src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bell_Labs-Synthesized_Speech-1961.mp3"></audio></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" width="1024" height="754" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MEchnical_Vocoder_Schematic-1024x754.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9481" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MEchnical_Vocoder_Schematic-1024x754.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MEchnical_Vocoder_Schematic-300x221.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MEchnical_Vocoder_Schematic-768x566.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MEchnical_Vocoder_Schematic-1536x1131.jpg 1536w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MEchnical_Vocoder_Schematic-2048x1508.jpg 2048w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MEchnical_Vocoder_Schematic-1200x884.jpg 1200w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/MEchnical_Vocoder_Schematic-1980x1458.jpg 1980w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="964" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_vocoder_2-1024x964.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9482" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_vocoder_2-1024x964.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_vocoder_2-300x282.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_vocoder_2-768x723.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_vocoder_2-1536x1446.jpg 1536w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_vocoder_2-2048x1928.jpg 2048w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_vocoder_2-1200x1129.jpg 1200w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Mech_vocoder_2-1980x1864.jpg 1980w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/bell-labs-electro-mechanical-speech-synthesizer-circa-1951/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		<enclosure url="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Bell_Labs-Synthesized_Speech-1961.mp3" length="997669" type="audio/mpeg" />

			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bogen DB20 Equalizer Circuit circa 1953</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/bogen-db20-equalizer-circuit-circa-1953/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/bogen-db20-equalizer-circuit-circa-1953/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2020 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Custom Fabrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bogen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equalizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schematics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=9472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="823" height="1024" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover-823x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9473" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover-823x1024.jpg 823w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover-241x300.jpg 241w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover-768x956.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover-1234x1536.jpg 1234w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover-1646x2048.jpg 1646w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover-1200x1493.jpg 1200w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover-1980x2464.jpg 1980w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RE1053_cover.jpg 2009w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 823px) 100vw, 823px" /><figcaption>From the October 1953 edition of RADIO ELECTRONICS comes this report on an exceptionally powerful EQ circuit as-found in the then-new Bogen DB20 amplifier.  The circuit uses no special parts and promises extremely wide-range control.  R11 is odd, i&#8217;m not sure why that is present.  I&#8217;m thinking that this might make a good EQ circuit for the Berlinetta DJ console&#8230;</figcaption></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="1024" height="875" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Bogen_DB10_EQ_schematic-1024x875.png" alt="" class="wp-image-9474" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Bogen_DB10_EQ_schematic-1024x875.png 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Bogen_DB10_EQ_schematic-300x256.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Bogen_DB10_EQ_schematic-768x656.png 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Bogen_DB10_EQ_schematic-1200x1026.png 1200w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Bogen_DB10_EQ_schematic.png 1398w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>



<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="844" height="1024" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-844x1024.jpg" alt="" class="wp-image-9475" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-844x1024.jpg 844w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-247x300.jpg 247w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-768x932.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1266x1536.jpg 1266w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1688x2048.jpg 1688w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1200x1456.jpg 1200w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Untitled-1980x2402.jpg 1980w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 844px) 100vw, 844px" /></figure>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/bogen-db20-equalizer-circuit-circa-1953/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Excellent Larry Scully / Bert Whyte interview from AUDIO 1969</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-larry-scully-bert-whyte-interview-from-audio-1969/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-larry-scully-bert-whyte-interview-from-audio-1969/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2018 19:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Connecticut Audio History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro Audio Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bridgeport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lathes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mastering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scully]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tape machines]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8891</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Download the complete 5-page Bert Whtye interview of Larry Scully from the 11.69 issue if AUDIO: DOWNLOAD: LarryScully_BertWhyte_Interview_AUDIO_1169 As longtime PS dot com readers know, we are based in Bridgeport CT,  former home of Scully.  Scully was America&#8217;s leading manufacturer of Lathes for cutting LP masters; only Neumann lathes offered any real competition in terms [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8892" rel="attachment wp-att-8892"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8892" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Variable_PitchScullyLathe_1956.jpg" alt="" width="821" height="709" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Variable_PitchScullyLathe_1956.jpg 821w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Variable_PitchScullyLathe_1956-300x259.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Variable_PitchScullyLathe_1956-768x663.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 821px) 100vw, 821px" /></a>Download the complete 5-page Bert Whtye interview of Larry Scully from the 11.69 issue if AUDIO:</p>
<p>DOWNLOAD: <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8893" rel="attachment wp-att-8893">LarryScully_BertWhyte_Interview_AUDIO_1169</a></p>
<p>As longtime PS dot com readers know, we are based in Bridgeport CT,  former home of Scully.  Scully was America&#8217;s leading manufacturer of Lathes for cutting LP masters; only Neumann lathes offered any real competition in terms of quality. Starting in 1962, with the aid of former PRESTO engineers, Scully also began manufacturing high-quality tape machines in a variety of formats.  I had a Scully 1&#8243; 8-track machine recently and it was a marvel of engineering; the sound quality was absolutely astonishing.  In this article, L Scully describes his father&#8217;s start at Columbia Records (also based in Bridgeport in the early 20th century), their movement the manufacture of professional tape machines, ETC.   Great piece of history.</p>
<p><em>There is a plethora of Scully, Columbia/Bridgeport, and Bert Whyte material elsewhere on this site; just use the search box.  </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-larry-scully-bert-whyte-interview-from-audio-1969/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Microphones And Their Placement&#8221; from &#8216;The Aerovox Research Worker&#8217; 1958</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/microphones-and-their-placement-from-the-aerovox-research-worker-1958/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/microphones-and-their-placement-from-the-aerovox-research-worker-1958/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2017 13:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Microphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro Audio Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[download a 6pp article on &#8220;Microphones And Their Placement&#8221; as published by the Aerovox Capacitor Corporation, 1958: DOWNLOAD: Microphones and their placement Written by Arthur Davis, Phillip Erhorn, and their team at Aerovox, the article offers an interesting historical perspective on microphone technique in the 1950s. (image source) If you&#8217;ve spent much time creeping around [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h6 style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8752" rel="attachment wp-att-8752"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8752" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Aerovox_Research_Worker.png" alt="" width="823" height="525" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Aerovox_Research_Worker.png 823w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Aerovox_Research_Worker-300x191.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Aerovox_Research_Worker-768x490.png 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 823px) 100vw, 823px" /></a>download a 6pp article on &#8220;Microphones And Their Placement&#8221; as published by the Aerovox Capacitor Corporation, 1958:</h6>
<h6>DOWNLOAD: <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8753" rel="attachment wp-att-8753">Microphones and their placement</a></h6>
<h6>Written by Arthur Davis, Phillip Erhorn, and their team at Aerovox, the article offers an interesting historical perspective on microphone technique in the 1950s.</h6>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8754" rel="attachment wp-att-8754"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8754" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/1994002374.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="500" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/1994002374.jpg 500w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/1994002374-150x150.jpg 150w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/1994002374-300x300.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px" /></a><em>(image source)</em></p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve spent much time creeping around inside old electronic equipment, you have undoubtedly seen numerous examples of the capacitor shown above.  I really don&#8217;t have a super-strong sense of &#8216;how good&#8217; Aerovox caps were as compared to their contemporaries, IE., how often they tend to need replacement, ETC,, but IIRC they tend to be more reliable than most 50&#8217;s foil caps.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Aerovox Research Worker&#8221; was a sort of &#8216;branded content&#8217; marketing item that the company published from at least 1949 through 1958.  I recently picked up a large pile of these publications, and most focus on RF and TV applications.  This was the only one I could find that was audio-focused.  Enjoy. CR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/microphones-and-their-placement-from-the-aerovox-research-worker-1958/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lost to time: Check out the Fairchild 627 Equalizer circa 195nvr</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/if-you-thought-the-fairchild-660670-was-rare-check-out-the-627-equalizer-circa-195nvr/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/if-you-thought-the-fairchild-660670-was-rare-check-out-the-627-equalizer-circa-195nvr/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2016 15:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equalizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairchild]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Apologies for the poor image quiality; these came from the research department of a long-gone British broadcast-gear-manufacturer via some dampish papers that I purchased recently from a rare-books-dealer in London.  I had never heard of the Fairchild 627 &#8216;Variable Equalizer,&#8217; even though I recently sold an example of its (even-more-rare) predecessor the model 540, which [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8608" rel="attachment wp-att-8608"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8608" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer.jpg" alt="fairchild_627_equalizer" width="998" height="658" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer.jpg 998w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer-300x198.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer-768x506.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 998px) 100vw, 998px" /></a>Apologies for the poor image quiality; these came from the research department of a long-gone British broadcast-gear-manufacturer via some dampish papers that I purchased recently from a rare-books-dealer in London.  I had never heard of the Fairchild 627 &#8216;Variable Equalizer,&#8217; even though I recently <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8389">sold an example of its (even-more-rare) predecessor the model 540</a>, which in retrospect seems to be the &#8216;boost&#8217; sections of the 627 plus a mic preamp plus a 20-watt cutter-head power amp.  Well shit.  Now i wish I had measured the values of the triple-ganged frequency-select pots.  Why?  We will get to that in a minute.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8606" rel="attachment wp-att-8606"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8606" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_internals.jpg" alt="fairchild_627_equalizer_internals" width="1012" height="610" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_internals.jpg 1012w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_internals-300x181.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_internals-768x463.jpg 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1012px) 100vw, 1012px" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8619" rel="attachment wp-att-8619"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8619" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/vintage-unobtanium-fairchild-627-tube_1_99dc4f93df9c200f11996b06da8735f3.jpg" alt="vintage-unobtanium-fairchild-627-tube_1_99dc4f93df9c200f11996b06da8735f3" width="400" height="258" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/vintage-unobtanium-fairchild-627-tube_1_99dc4f93df9c200f11996b06da8735f3.jpg 400w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/vintage-unobtanium-fairchild-627-tube_1_99dc4f93df9c200f11996b06da8735f3-300x194.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px" /></a><a href="http://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/vintage-unobtanium-fairchild-627-tube-135319292"><em>image source</em></a></p>
<p>A quick google search suggests that there are thought to be only 5 Fairchild 627 equalizers in existence.  One seems to have sold on eBay recently in the $7000 region.  The 627 is a line-level EQ with continuously variable low and high bell boost sections as well as high and low roll offs. Unlike a Pultec, though, it is an active EQ, and it uses some pretty unusual circuitry &#8211; especially the high-cut section, which I don&#8217;t comprehend at all.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8603" rel="attachment wp-att-8603"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8603" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_block_diagram.jpg" alt="fairchild_627_block_diagram" width="1089" height="605" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_block_diagram.jpg 1089w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_block_diagram-300x167.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_block_diagram-768x427.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_block_diagram-1024x569.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_block_diagram-672x372.jpg 672w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_block_diagram-1038x576.jpg 1038w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1089px) 100vw, 1089px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8607" rel="attachment wp-att-8607"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8607" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_Schematic.jpg" alt="fairchild_627_equalizer_schematic" width="2174" height="1105" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_Schematic.jpg 2174w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_Schematic-300x152.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_Schematic-768x390.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_equalizer_Schematic-1024x520.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 2174px) 100vw, 2174px" /></a>One point to note: T2 should be wired to reverse phase.  I was v excited to find this schematic, because it seems like a pretty easy piece to build &#8211; there is no mention of the proper B+ voltage, but 250 is generally a safe bet; there are no weird inductors (the UTC S-23 plate-load choke is an off-the shelf part, so we know its specs  -5000ohm DC, 300 henries); the audio transformers don&#8217;t need to handle DC and the turns ratios are spec&#8217;d:  BUT:  But.  Those triple-ganged pots.  WTF do we do about them?</p>
<p>Can anyone crack this case? Any insights, pls let us know in the comments section.</p>
<p>On the plus-side:  at very minimum, this schematic does reveal an excellent and easy way to implement a 6E5 seeing-eye tube simply paralleled to a grid in the audio path.  So at very least, now i know how to use those v excellent things in my mic preamps.  Way more evil than a VU meter.</p>
<p>Also: the 6SN7 output section is a neat little self-contained module; def worth trying it with a Hammond 156C choke and an Edcor 15K:600 1/2 watt.   The 156C is the closest modern part to the S23 spec; it is rated 150h and 3.7K ohm, seems close enough?  I used onna these on a hunch in my OP6-semi-clone and it worked just fine in that application, so I am guessing it may work fine here as well.  <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8604" rel="attachment wp-att-8604"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8604" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_boost_curves.jpg" alt="fairchild_627_boost_curves" width="1419" height="660" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_boost_curves.jpg 1419w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_boost_curves-300x140.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_boost_curves-768x357.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_boost_curves-1024x476.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1419px) 100vw, 1419px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8609" rel="attachment wp-att-8609"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8609" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_High_low_frequency_Rolloffs.jpg" alt="fairchild_627_high_low_frequency_rolloffs" width="1412" height="812" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_High_low_frequency_Rolloffs.jpg 1412w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_High_low_frequency_Rolloffs-300x173.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_High_low_frequency_Rolloffs-768x442.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_High_low_frequency_Rolloffs-1024x589.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1412px) 100vw, 1412px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8605" rel="attachment wp-att-8605"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8605" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_curves_2.jpg" alt="fairchild_627_curves_2" width="1400" height="600" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_curves_2.jpg 1400w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_curves_2-300x129.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_curves_2-768x329.jpg 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Fairchild_627_curves_2-1024x439.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1400px) 100vw, 1400px" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/if-you-thought-the-fairchild-660670-was-rare-check-out-the-627-equalizer-circa-195nvr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fisher PR6 Phono Preamp Circa &#8217;55</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fisher-pr6-phono-preamp-circa-55/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fisher-pr6-phono-preamp-circa-55/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2016 18:05:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hifi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phono preamp]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8526</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Been working on developing a &#8216;NEW&#8217; octal -based RIAA preamp so this caught my eye in a giant pile of rotten paper at ye olde Sunday Flea.   Click the link below to download the manual for the Fisher PR6 preamp, including schematics ETC.  And check out this link for some worthy thoughts on mod&#8217;ing [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8527" rel="attachment wp-att-8527"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8527" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6.png" alt="Fisher_PR6" width="957" height="921" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6.png 957w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6-300x289.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6-768x739.png 768w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 957px) 100vw, 957px" /></a>Been working on developing a &#8216;NEW&#8217; octal -based RIAA preamp so this caught my eye in a giant pile of rotten paper at ye olde Sunday Flea.   Click the link below to download the manual for the Fisher PR6 preamp, including schematics ETC.  <a href="http://www.audioasylum.com/cgi/vt.mpl?f=tubediy&amp;m=240540">And check out this link</a> for some worthy thoughts on mod&#8217;ing the circuit.</p>
<p>DOWNLOAD: <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8530" rel="attachment wp-att-8530">Fisher_PR6_Manual</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8528" rel="attachment wp-att-8528"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8528" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_schematic.png" alt="Fisher_PR6_schematic" width="2629" height="1715" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_schematic.png 2629w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_schematic-300x196.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_schematic-768x501.png 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_schematic-1024x668.png 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 2629px) 100vw, 2629px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?attachment_id=8529" rel="attachment wp-att-8529"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8529" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_partsList.png" alt="Fisher_PR6_partsList" width="1233" height="692" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_partsList.png 1233w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_partsList-300x168.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_partsList-768x431.png 768w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Fisher_PR6_partsList-1024x575.png 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1233px) 100vw, 1233px" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fisher-pr6-phono-preamp-circa-55/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Argentine Hi-Fi DIY Circa 1958</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/argentine-hi-fi-diy-circa-1958/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/argentine-hi-fi-diy-circa-1958/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Antique Hi-Fi Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[williamson]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Many years ago I published this article abt digging for ancient audio ephemera in Buenos Aires.   Reader N. Dinapoli Farina uncovered some related materials and has shared them with us here. I believe that the magazine may have been called &#8220;Radio Chassis Television&#8221; and the scans below are all from the late 1950s.  Click on [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Argentine_Williamnson_1958.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8458" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Argentine_Williamnson_1958.png" alt="Argentine_Williamnson_1958" width="818" height="393" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Argentine_Williamnson_1958.png 818w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Argentine_Williamnson_1958-300x144.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 818px) 100vw, 818px" /></a>Many years ago I published <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=595" target="_blank">this article abt digging for ancient audio ephemera in Buenos Aires</a>.   Reader N. Dinapoli Farina uncovered some related materials and has shared them with us here. I believe that the magazine may have been called &#8220;Radio Chassis Television&#8221; and the scans below are all from the late 1950s.  Click on the images for hi-res.   Enjoy!</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_Schem_1958.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8464" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_Schem_1958.png" alt="Williamson_Schem_1958" width="1363" height="959" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_Schem_1958.png 1363w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_Schem_1958-300x211.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_Schem_1958-1024x720.png 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1363px) 100vw, 1363px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_PS_1958.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8463" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_PS_1958.png" alt="Williamson_PS_1958" width="463" height="847" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_PS_1958.png 463w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Williamson_PS_1958-164x300.png 164w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 463px) 100vw, 463px" /></a><em>Above: Williamson style amp and power supply.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/AltaFidelidad_15wattAmp_1957.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8457" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/AltaFidelidad_15wattAmp_1957.png" alt="AltaFidelidad_15wattAmp_1957" width="1421" height="943" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/AltaFidelidad_15wattAmp_1957.png 1421w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/AltaFidelidad_15wattAmp_1957-300x199.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/AltaFidelidad_15wattAmp_1957-1024x680.png 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1421px) 100vw, 1421px" /></a><em>Fifteen-watt &#8220;Alta Fidelidad&#8221; amplifier.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Preamp_1958.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8460" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Preamp_1958.jpg" alt="Preamp_1958" width="1742" height="1367" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Preamp_1958.jpg 1742w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Preamp_1958-300x235.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Preamp_1958-1024x804.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1742px) 100vw, 1742px" /></a><em>Full-featured mono preamp</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/MicMixer.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8459" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/MicMixer.png" alt="MicMixer" width="940" height="334" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/MicMixer.png 940w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/MicMixer-300x107.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 940px) 100vw, 940px" /></a><em>Super basic hi-z mic mixer</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/System.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8462" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/System.png" alt="System" width="1340" height="674" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/System.png 1340w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/System-300x151.png 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/System-1024x515.png 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1340px) 100vw, 1340px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Speaker.png"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8461" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Speaker.png" alt="Speaker" width="555" height="549" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Speaker.png 555w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Speaker-300x297.png 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 555px) 100vw, 555px" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">
<p style="text-align: center;">
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/argentine-hi-fi-diy-circa-1958/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Fairchild Model 605 Stereo Tube Phono Preamp c. 1959</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fairchild-model-605-stereo-tube-phono-preamp-c-1959/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fairchild-model-605-stereo-tube-phono-preamp-c-1959/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairchild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hifi preamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phono preamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How y&#8217;all  doing on this frigid day in March,,,  so listen, srry abt not posting much new material this past year.  I&#8217;ll be frank: as phones keep getting better and better, and online content keeps getting more and more tailored TO the phone as a consequence thereof, many of us are spending less and less [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8324" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre-646x1024.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_606_pre" width="640" height="1014" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre-646x1024.jpg 646w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre-189x300.jpg 189w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre.jpg 995w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>How y&#8217;all  doing on this frigid day in March,,,  so listen, srry abt not posting much new material this past year.  I&#8217;ll be frank: as phones keep getting better and better, and online content keeps getting more and more tailored TO the phone as a consequence thereof, many of us are spending less and less recreational time in front of the laptop <em>(although I am still planted in front of some sort of Mac, invariably, for my production and composing work,,,) </em>and more of that &#8216;leisure&#8217; time with the phone.  <a href="https://instagram.com/preservationsound/" target="_blank">Instagram</a> rather than &#8216;scoping blogs&#8217; seems better tailored to how most folks are spending their recreational internet time these days.  So we&#8217;ve been keeping an active+vigorous presence up there.  This blog isn&#8217;t going away, but do check out the <a href="https://instagram.com/preservationsound/" target="_blank">IG account</a> if you have not yet.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8325" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output-1024x794.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_606_PS_output" width="640" height="496" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output-1024x794.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output-300x233.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output.jpg 1350w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Ok NEways,,, I was diggin thru the archive for something today and I came across the schematic for a phono preamp that Fairchild offered around 1959 &#8211; their model 605.  Strangely enough, their prototype (image at head) was labeled &#8216;606.&#8217;  Production examples do bear the mark 605, though, as this example from a Russian website indicates:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8326" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_606" width="598" height="366" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606.jpg 598w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606-300x184.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 598px) 100vw, 598px" /></a>(<a href="http://www.soundup.ru/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1446:fairchild-model-605-tube-turntable-phono-preamp&amp;catid=11:pre-amplifier&amp;directory=14" target="_blank"><em>image source</em></a>)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">There is very little information on the web about this unit &#8211; in fact, a google search offers,,, good &#8216;ole Preservation Sound Dot Com as its first result when queried.  And not much else of relevance.  We apparently ran an advert for this very unit some years back (<a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4024" target="_blank">click here for that earlier post</a>).  So I was very excited to see that this unit, which is VERY buildable using off-the-shelf components, had not yet &#8216;migrated&#8217; onto the web.  The Fairchild 606 offers both MC and MM input stages, 600ohm balanced outputs, and selectable EQ curves and stereo or true mono LP operation.  Now, I&#8217;ve built many Marantz and RCA-style tube phono preamps to great success, but this Fairchild is simultaneously exotic AND obtainable enough to be quite intriguing.   So, DIYers of the world, here ya go:  knock yrself out:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8328" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic-1024x620.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic" width="640" height="388" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic-1024x620.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic-300x182.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>(click on image for a (<em>huge</em>) full size image)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">There&#8217;s nothing exotic in it: no custom inductors, weird-taper pots, or un-source-able transformers.  The toughest thing to find might be the 4P/6T switch, but you could always sub in a pair of 2P/6T switches and just <em>use two hands</em>.  In fact, the input transformers, which I can confirm are 1:20 from the 600 ohm tap, appear to be garden-variety Beyers:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_inputTrans.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8327" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_inputTrans.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_inputTrans" width="567" height="294" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_inputTrans.jpg 567w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_inputTrans-300x156.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 567px) 100vw, 567px" /></a><em>(<a href="http://www.soundup.ru/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1446:fairchild-model-605-tube-turntable-phono-preamp&amp;catid=11:pre-amplifier&amp;directory=14" target="_blank">image source</a>)</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Regardless, though, you can use any hi-fidelity input transformer with a roughly 1:20 ratio and an input impedance approx.  10X whatever the output impedance of your moving-coil cartridge is.  And if you only use a moving-magnet cartridge, you can skip that part of the circuit entirely and just build the 47K ohm grid-input stage (and all that follows).  As the schematic indicates and the images confirm, this product was built in two chassis:  (preamps+EQs) and (power supply+output stages).  Other details: R109 and R209 are level controls, basic voltage dividers with a 20db range.  EQ offered is flat, RIAA, or RIAA plus add&#8217;l roll-off, and the &#8216;Lateral&#8217; switching positions offered cancel out the vertical tracking information, resulting in the cleanest possible sound from mono records.  The output stage is fairly conventional, but interestingly enough requires single-ended transformers, so you will be rather limited in your options here (a 15K:600 that can handle 8ma DC unbalanced, such as a UTC A25, should work fine).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">This is a fairly advanced project, which I have personally not built (yet). I cannot offer any technical support or help with this.  If you have never built a vacuum-tube phono preamp or mic preamp from scratch before, I would not advise undertaking this project.  Good luck, and if you build one, send us some pics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fairchild-model-605-stereo-tube-phono-preamp-c-1959/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 1959 Ikegami-Tushin Limiter Inspired by the RCA BA6A</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-1959-ikegami-tushin-limiter-inspired-by-the-rca-ba6a/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-1959-ikegami-tushin-limiter-inspired-by-the-rca-ba6a/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:28:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[RCA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reader submissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tube limiter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8297</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reader S. Komiya recently contacted us with some information regarding the Ikegami-Tushin limiting amplifier, an RCA BA-6A inspired piece that was built for Japanese broadcaster NHK in 1959. SK has been so kind as to provide the schematic for this obscure device, as well as some background information.  I am posting the schematic full-size, so [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHK_D_1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8302" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHK_D_1-1024x642.jpg" alt="NHK_D_1" width="640" height="401" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHK_D_1.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHK_D_1-300x188.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Reader S. Komiya recently contacted us with some information regarding the Ikegami-Tushin limiting amplifier, an RCA BA-6A inspired piece that was built for Japanese broadcaster NHK in 1959.</p>
<p>SK has been so kind as to provide the schematic for this obscure device, as well as some background information.  I am posting the schematic full-size, so you can control-click it and download it for detailed viewing.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/00_schematics_ikegami-limiter1959.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8298" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/00_schematics_ikegami-limiter1959.jpg" alt="00_schematics_ikegami-limiter1959" width="1850" height="990" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/00_schematics_ikegami-limiter1959.jpg 1850w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/00_schematics_ikegami-limiter1959-300x161.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/00_schematics_ikegami-limiter1959-1024x548.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1850px) 100vw, 1850px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHK_E1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8303" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHK_E1.jpg" alt="NHK_E1" width="1024" height="642" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHK_E1.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHK_E1-300x188.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>The photos in this post come from t<a href="http://page24.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/q56896391" target="_blank">his Japanese auction website</a>; the device pictured here recently sold for just Y30,000 ($300 USD).  <em>And in working condition.  </em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/600x450-2015011900002.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8300" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/600x450-2015011900002.jpg" alt="600x450-2015011900002" width="600" height="450" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/600x450-2015011900002.jpg 600w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/600x450-2015011900002-300x225.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px" /></a>Here&#8217;s what SK has to say about the Ikegami-Tushin Limiter:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>&#8216;(It is) very much inspired by the RCA BA6A for sure.  It even looks a bit like it.  The tube format is very similar:  just change 6sk7 to 6ba6, 6j7 to 6au6 those goes into 6v6 PP and transformers between 6au6.  6ba6 were popular and cheap in japan because we made those a lot in japan in the 1950s and 60s.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em> 6sk7 and 6j7 were never made in japan.  This unit also has an extra gain stage before first stage, which is pretty neat.  The components seem very high-end and some are custom made for this.  When i was gathering info about the ba6a in old tube shop, an older ham radio guy told me that he DIY&#8217;d one of these a long time ago&#8230;&#8217;</em><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHKH_1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8306" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHKH_1.jpg" alt="NHKH_1" width="1024" height="632" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHKH_1.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHKH_1-300x185.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHKF_1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8304" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHKF_1.jpg" alt="NHKF_1" width="1024" height="632" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHKF_1.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/NHKF_1-300x185.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></a>*************</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">*******</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">***</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/20141230_123551.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8307" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/20141230_123551.jpg" alt="20141230_123551" width="2064" height="1161" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/20141230_123551.jpg 2064w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/20141230_123551-300x169.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/20141230_123551-1024x576.jpg 1024w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 2064px) 100vw, 2064px" /></a>SK also recently built his own BA6A from scratch.  It is depicted above, and <a href="https://soundcloud.com/shoonbassjp/fed-vs-ba6ajupiter" target="_blank">you can hear audio samples of it at his soundcloud page</a>.  SK has also scratch-built the Federal AM864 tube limiter, and he has this to say about the projects:</p>
<p dir="ltr" style="text-align: center;"><em>&#8220;The sound you will hear in soundcloud is a good comparison with the fed864.   The fed has good high open but compressed sound,  the ba6a has low mid, ton of low mid. I love them both.  The first time I used them was at a studio in Chicago back in 90s when I was living in US.  At that time I was using LA-2A mainly, but that studio had a Fed864 and BA6A.  They blew my mind, and since then I wanted them so bad!&#8217;</em></p>
<p dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;">SK also provided some build-notes on his BA6A project; if you are planning on building you own BA6A, you might find these useful:  <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/S_Komiya_RCA_Ba6a_DIY_notes.pdf">S_Komiya_RCA_Ba6a_DIY_notes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-1959-ikegami-tushin-limiter-inspired-by-the-rca-ba6a/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>An DIY Tube Mixer Project c.1954</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-interesting-tube-mixer-project-c-1954/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-interesting-tube-mixer-project-c-1954/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2015 14:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8287</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Today&#8217;s article scan, again via reader Bill W., was written by one John S. Carroll and originally appeared in RADIO &#38; TELEVISION news in 1954.  It describes a four-into-one mixer based on a design spec&#8217;d by UTC. DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE ARTICLE: 1954 Audio Mixer There&#8217;s nothing terribly interesting about this particular circuit other than the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/TubeMixer_DIY_1954.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8292" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/TubeMixer_DIY_1954-1024x579.jpg" alt="TubeMixer_DIY_1954" width="640" height="362" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/TubeMixer_DIY_1954-1024x579.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/TubeMixer_DIY_1954-300x170.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/TubeMixer_DIY_1954.jpg 1033w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Today&#8217;s article scan, again via reader Bill W., was written by one John S. Carroll and originally appeared in RADIO &amp; TELEVISION news in 1954.  It describes a four-into-one mixer based on a design spec&#8217;d by UTC.</p>
<p>DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE ARTICLE: <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954-Audio-Mixer.pdf">1954 Audio Mixer</a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_tube_mixer_rear.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8291" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_tube_mixer_rear.jpg" alt="1954_tube_mixer_rear" width="671" height="404" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_tube_mixer_rear.jpg 671w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_tube_mixer_rear-300x181.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 671px) 100vw, 671px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_tube_mixer_bttm.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8290" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_tube_mixer_bttm.jpg" alt="1954_tube_mixer_bttm" width="685" height="254" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_tube_mixer_bttm.jpg 685w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_tube_mixer_bttm-300x111.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 685px) 100vw, 685px" /></a>There&#8217;s nothing terribly interesting about this particular circuit other than the output stage, which is push-pull and and is driven by a 3:1 interstage transformer which functions as both a phase inverter and provides a bit of additional voltage gain.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Output_stage.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8288" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Output_stage.jpg" alt="Output_stage" width="847" height="558" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Output_stage.jpg 847w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Output_stage-300x198.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 847px) 100vw, 847px" /></a>I&#8217;ve never made a mic pre with a transformer phase inverter, but it could be very cool.  At <a href="http://www.goldcoastrecorders.com/" target="_blank">Gold Coast Recorders</a> one of the engineers&#8217; favorite mic pre&#8217;s is a custom unit that I built based around an RCA 9362 cinema line amp (<em><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=401" target="_blank">see earlier article here</a>)</em>.  The 9362 is a push-pull output module, and it&#8217;s definitely a different sound &#8211; almost every tube mic pre made is single-ended.  Anyhow, at some point I will def build the circuit above into a mic pre.  Probably as soon as I find a pair of appropriate hi-fidelity (<em>and shielded!</em>) transformers for a buck.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_mixer_schematic.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8289" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_mixer_schematic-943x1024.jpg" alt="1954_mixer_schematic" width="640" height="695" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_mixer_schematic-943x1024.jpg 943w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_mixer_schematic-276x300.jpg 276w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/1954_mixer_schematic.jpg 1386w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/an-interesting-tube-mixer-project-c-1954/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
