<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: UPDATED: Cook Labs Test Records Circa 1952	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/cook-labs-test-records-circa-1952/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/cook-labs-test-records-circa-1952/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:04:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/cook-labs-test-records-circa-1952/#comment-140442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 05:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6240#comment-140442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/cook-labs-test-records-circa-1952/#comment-140233&quot;&gt;h r gonif&lt;/a&gt;.

Well, it isn&#039;t a Gotham, a Presto or as far as I can tell a Westrex. It has no meters, it looks like the lower panel has a seeing eye tube of the 6E5 persuasion. 

 It has a label but I can&#039;t read it from the scan.  The label could be for the head and the amp could be a homebrew.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/cook-labs-test-records-circa-1952/#comment-140233">h r gonif</a>.</p>
<p>Well, it isn&#8217;t a Gotham, a Presto or as far as I can tell a Westrex. It has no meters, it looks like the lower panel has a seeing eye tube of the 6E5 persuasion. </p>
<p> It has a label but I can&#8217;t read it from the scan.  The label could be for the head and the amp could be a homebrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: h r gonif		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/cook-labs-test-records-circa-1952/#comment-140233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[h r gonif]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 01:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6240#comment-140233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What amp is that cutter head attached to?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What amp is that cutter head attached to?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Fine		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/cook-labs-test-records-circa-1952/#comment-138859</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Fine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 00:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6240#comment-138859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Chris: The way I understand the history, both RCA and Columbia produced microgroove test records when they developed their microgroove formats (45RPM 7&quot; disk for RCA, 12&quot; and 10&quot; 33 RPM disks for Columbia). But these test disks were for professional mastering places, playback equipment designers and manufacturers, etc. 

The Cook record seems to have been aimed at both professionals and serious hobbyists who were building and/or setting up phono playback equipment. Cook was also clever with marketing, this record proved the quality of his cutting equipment. In the early days of the microgroove, I don&#039;t think there were very many other options for the hobbyist beyond the Cook record.

In 1954, when the industry adopted the RIAA curve, a bunch of semi-professional &quot;test and demo&quot; records came along, sometimes including calibrated test tones and sometimes just including &quot;tracking challenge&quot; music and sound effects. There was another bevvy of &quot;test record&quot; releases when the stereo LP debuted in 1958. In the 70s, we had more. 

From the early days of the stereo LP, the CBS Labs test records were the standard device for designing and building playback equipment.  The Command Stereo Test Record was made at Fine Recording. It includes calibrated tones to set level and check frequency response, as well as a phase test and a silent groove to test for rumble. Side two is a narrated tour of some Command pop tunes pointing out what to listen for, to determine if the cartridge is tracking correctly.

The most recent calibrated test record is from Analogue Productions. Its levels test out to be accurately described and it is well calibrated to the RIAA curve, so it&#039;s quite useful for setting levels, balance and testing the frequency response of a cartridge. It&#039;s also got a useful test for wow and flutter and a speed-check tone (which shows that many of the modern lower-priced belt-drive turntables don&#039;t hold 33.3RPM due to cheap motors and cheap platter bearings). The Analogue Productions record is very well manufactured, on quite and pretty much tick-free vinyl.

One big thing that test records have shown me is how many cartridges have uneven channel-to-channel levels and sometimes uneven frequency response. In the lower priced world, you can&#039;t beat the Denon DL-110, it&#039;s super-flat and nearly identical channel-to-channel (3 different units tested, manufactured over a 10-year period).

-- Tom Fine
(Still Spinnin&#039; Ye Olde Vinyl)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris: The way I understand the history, both RCA and Columbia produced microgroove test records when they developed their microgroove formats (45RPM 7&#8243; disk for RCA, 12&#8243; and 10&#8243; 33 RPM disks for Columbia). But these test disks were for professional mastering places, playback equipment designers and manufacturers, etc. </p>
<p>The Cook record seems to have been aimed at both professionals and serious hobbyists who were building and/or setting up phono playback equipment. Cook was also clever with marketing, this record proved the quality of his cutting equipment. In the early days of the microgroove, I don&#8217;t think there were very many other options for the hobbyist beyond the Cook record.</p>
<p>In 1954, when the industry adopted the RIAA curve, a bunch of semi-professional &#8220;test and demo&#8221; records came along, sometimes including calibrated test tones and sometimes just including &#8220;tracking challenge&#8221; music and sound effects. There was another bevvy of &#8220;test record&#8221; releases when the stereo LP debuted in 1958. In the 70s, we had more. </p>
<p>From the early days of the stereo LP, the CBS Labs test records were the standard device for designing and building playback equipment.  The Command Stereo Test Record was made at Fine Recording. It includes calibrated tones to set level and check frequency response, as well as a phase test and a silent groove to test for rumble. Side two is a narrated tour of some Command pop tunes pointing out what to listen for, to determine if the cartridge is tracking correctly.</p>
<p>The most recent calibrated test record is from Analogue Productions. Its levels test out to be accurately described and it is well calibrated to the RIAA curve, so it&#8217;s quite useful for setting levels, balance and testing the frequency response of a cartridge. It&#8217;s also got a useful test for wow and flutter and a speed-check tone (which shows that many of the modern lower-priced belt-drive turntables don&#8217;t hold 33.3RPM due to cheap motors and cheap platter bearings). The Analogue Productions record is very well manufactured, on quite and pretty much tick-free vinyl.</p>
<p>One big thing that test records have shown me is how many cartridges have uneven channel-to-channel levels and sometimes uneven frequency response. In the lower priced world, you can&#8217;t beat the Denon DL-110, it&#8217;s super-flat and nearly identical channel-to-channel (3 different units tested, manufactured over a 10-year period).</p>
<p>&#8212; Tom Fine<br />
(Still Spinnin&#8217; Ye Olde Vinyl)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: W.B.		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/cook-labs-test-records-circa-1952/#comment-138780</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[W.B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6240#comment-138780</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Atlantic Records used the Cook feedback cutter (or one of them, anyway) on their main mono Scully lathe up to the late 1950&#039;s/early &#039;60&#039;s, after which they replaced it with a Grampian feedback cutterhead.  Many late &#039;50&#039;s LP&#039;s issued on Atlantic and Atco mentioned Cook feedback cutters as what they used to master their records with.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Atlantic Records used the Cook feedback cutter (or one of them, anyway) on their main mono Scully lathe up to the late 1950&#8217;s/early &#8217;60&#8217;s, after which they replaced it with a Grampian feedback cutterhead.  Many late &#8217;50&#8217;s LP&#8217;s issued on Atlantic and Atco mentioned Cook feedback cutters as what they used to master their records with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
