<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Excellent Article on Larry Scully and the Variable-Pitch Lathe c. 1956	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-article-on-larry-scully-and-the-variable-pitch-lathe-c-1956/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-article-on-larry-scully-and-the-variable-pitch-lathe-c-1956/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:54:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scully kit of the early 1960s &#124; Preservation Sound		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-article-on-larry-scully-and-the-variable-pitch-lathe-c-1956/#comment-148715</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scully kit of the early 1960s &#124; Preservation Sound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5669#comment-148715</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] Larry Scully interview and history [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Larry Scully interview and history [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: W.B.		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-article-on-larry-scully-and-the-variable-pitch-lathe-c-1956/#comment-42989</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[W.B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 03:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5669#comment-42989</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I suppose that the Model 601 was what was introduced in 1955, and spotlighted in that &lt;i&gt;High Fidelity&lt;/i&gt; article; which was the model that immediately preceded it?  (Which had the same lead-in, band and lead-out characteristics, and had the same variable pitch controls and pitch knob as dating to fall 1950, and was earliest in use by RCA Victor in early 1951.)  I know the 501 had the old-style &quot;gear box.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose that the Model 601 was what was introduced in 1955, and spotlighted in that <i>High Fidelity</i> article; which was the model that immediately preceded it?  (Which had the same lead-in, band and lead-out characteristics, and had the same variable pitch controls and pitch knob as dating to fall 1950, and was earliest in use by RCA Victor in early 1951.)  I know the 501 had the old-style &#8220;gear box.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-article-on-larry-scully-and-the-variable-pitch-lathe-c-1956/#comment-40199</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5669#comment-40199</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-article-on-larry-scully-and-the-variable-pitch-lathe-c-1956/#comment-40196&quot;&gt;Tom Fine&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi T.  Thanks for the add&#039;l info.  BTW my &#039;pricing updates&#039; are generated by this handy applet:

http://futureboy.us/fsp/dollar.fsp

Cum grano salis

But seems accurate?

c.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-article-on-larry-scully-and-the-variable-pitch-lathe-c-1956/#comment-40196">Tom Fine</a>.</p>
<p>Hi T.  Thanks for the add&#8217;l info.  BTW my &#8216;pricing updates&#8217; are generated by this handy applet:</p>
<p><a href="http://futureboy.us/fsp/dollar.fsp" rel="nofollow ugc">http://futureboy.us/fsp/dollar.fsp</a></p>
<p>Cum grano salis</p>
<p>But seems accurate?</p>
<p>c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Fine		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/excellent-article-on-larry-scully-and-the-variable-pitch-lathe-c-1956/#comment-40196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Fine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 12:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5669#comment-40196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chris, Bernie Grundman still uses Scully lathes:
http://www.berniegrundmanmastering.com/technical/disc_cut.html

Here are more detailed pictures:
http://www.berniegrundmanmastering.com/technical/disc_cut_pics.html

Bernie used to have one or two of Gerry Block&#039;s automated margin-control systems for the Scully lathe. 

I wonder how many other Scully lathes are still in use out there?

Your price number of $72K is interesting. I think that&#039;s about what a fully equipped Neumann computerized system cost in the late 70&#039;s.

-- Tom Fine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, Bernie Grundman still uses Scully lathes:<br />
<a href="http://www.berniegrundmanmastering.com/technical/disc_cut.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.berniegrundmanmastering.com/technical/disc_cut.html</a></p>
<p>Here are more detailed pictures:<br />
<a href="http://www.berniegrundmanmastering.com/technical/disc_cut_pics.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.berniegrundmanmastering.com/technical/disc_cut_pics.html</a></p>
<p>Bernie used to have one or two of Gerry Block&#8217;s automated margin-control systems for the Scully lathe. </p>
<p>I wonder how many other Scully lathes are still in use out there?</p>
<p>Your price number of $72K is interesting. I think that&#8217;s about what a fully equipped Neumann computerized system cost in the late 70&#8217;s.</p>
<p>&#8212; Tom Fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
