<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Forgotten Microphone Shoot-out	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/forgotten-microphone-shoot-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/forgotten-microphone-shoot-out/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John H		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/forgotten-microphone-shoot-out/#comment-618675</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John H]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=803#comment-618675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi I just recently acquired a Executone/Turner 99 at the Orlando Hamcation. I am a ham radio operator and enjoy collecting antique and vintage microphones and getting my finds on the air. I was very impressed how a 65-70 year old mic can sound better than a much newer product. I have not had a chance to wire my new find up and give it a test on the air. However after listening to your comparisons I am psyched. Thank you for your You Tube video.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I just recently acquired a Executone/Turner 99 at the Orlando Hamcation. I am a ham radio operator and enjoy collecting antique and vintage microphones and getting my finds on the air. I was very impressed how a 65-70 year old mic can sound better than a much newer product. I have not had a chance to wire my new find up and give it a test on the air. However after listening to your comparisons I am psyched. Thank you for your You Tube video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Turner Microphones Circa 1962 &#124; Preservation Sound		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/forgotten-microphone-shoot-out/#comment-14988</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Turner Microphones Circa 1962 &#124; Preservation Sound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 13:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=803#comment-14988</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] more common are the Turner U9s and its several variants.  See this link for a listening test I did with a U99 earlier this year.   When Turner describes this mic as rugged, they are not kidding. I own three of these; they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] more common are the Turner U9s and its several variants.  See this link for a listening test I did with a U99 earlier this year.   When Turner describes this mic as rugged, they are not kidding. I own three of these; they are [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Studio Microphones of 1955 &#124; Preservation Sound		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/forgotten-microphone-shoot-out/#comment-2514</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Studio Microphones of 1955 &#124; Preservation Sound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 14:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=803#comment-2514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] The Shure 530.  This was Shure&#8217;s mid-range &#8216;pencil&#8217; mic in the 1950s.  At the top end was the 525; lower in the line was the 535.  See this link for some audio tests including the 535. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The Shure 530.  This was Shure&#8217;s mid-range &#8216;pencil&#8217; mic in the 1950s.  At the top end was the 525; lower in the line was the 535.  See this link for some audio tests including the 535. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
