<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gotham Professional Equipment Catalog c.1972	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/gotham-professional-equipment-catalog-c-1972/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/gotham-professional-equipment-catalog-c-1972/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:19:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Luis Mazzoni		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/gotham-professional-equipment-catalog-c-1972/#comment-224608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luis Mazzoni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2013 01:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6574#comment-224608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lovely desk 
Thabks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lovely desk<br />
Thabks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gotham Audio NYC &#8211; Complete 1979 Catalog Download &#124; Preservation Sound		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/gotham-professional-equipment-catalog-c-1972/#comment-183305</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gotham Audio NYC &#8211; Complete 1979 Catalog Download &#124; Preservation Sound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 10:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6574#comment-183305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] our earlier scan of the 1972 Gotham Audio catalog, click here.  Astute commentators are encouraged to reflect on what had changed significantly between [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] our earlier scan of the 1972 Gotham Audio catalog, click here.  Astute commentators are encouraged to reflect on what had changed significantly between [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Halma		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/gotham-professional-equipment-catalog-c-1972/#comment-158632</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 18:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6574#comment-158632</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I need one of those consoles. Ashtrays &#038; Rolls Royce electric cigarette lighter... how cool is that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I need one of those consoles. Ashtrays &amp; Rolls Royce electric cigarette lighter&#8230; how cool is that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/gotham-professional-equipment-catalog-c-1972/#comment-158485</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6574#comment-158485</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was just thinking of Stephen Temmer and Gotham Audio, because the recent demise of a particularly rancid politician provided me with much the same feeling as I had when Temmer died.  

 1972 was, however, hardly the high point of sound quality for Gotham Audio. That would have been in the tube days, when signal paths were simpler. 

 The CD does not have an adequate bit rate for really good digital audio, It was a compromise determined by Herbert von Karajan&#039;s desire for a full length rendition of (I believe) Beethoven&#039;s Eroica on a disk that could fit in a drive that would fit in a 5 1/4 floppy drive slot or a DIN dimensioned car radio. I believe DVD-Audio and SACD both satisfactorily solve the problem.

 But the core problem the music and music recording industries face is not technical. Even MP3s are more than good enough when the music itself is not any good. We simply, as  Bob Ohlsson says, do not have the systems in place where young people can learn the craft of pop music anymore. You have people who can&#039;t play singing and playing stuff by people who can&#039;&#039;t write lyrics or compose music.  

 There are exceptions and in fact one consequence of this is that moderately good people can become superstars. Most of the superstars right now are in fact moderately to very good in historical terms. But decades ago moderately good in and of itself got you nowhere. There were tons of excellent musicians and singers out there. They knew what they were doing. They&#039;d paid their dues and they had a place to do it. 

 I don&#039;t know how to fix the problem. I wish I did.  But it is a fact and evading it isn&#039;t going to do any good.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just thinking of Stephen Temmer and Gotham Audio, because the recent demise of a particularly rancid politician provided me with much the same feeling as I had when Temmer died.  </p>
<p> 1972 was, however, hardly the high point of sound quality for Gotham Audio. That would have been in the tube days, when signal paths were simpler. </p>
<p> The CD does not have an adequate bit rate for really good digital audio, It was a compromise determined by Herbert von Karajan&#8217;s desire for a full length rendition of (I believe) Beethoven&#8217;s Eroica on a disk that could fit in a drive that would fit in a 5 1/4 floppy drive slot or a DIN dimensioned car radio. I believe DVD-Audio and SACD both satisfactorily solve the problem.</p>
<p> But the core problem the music and music recording industries face is not technical. Even MP3s are more than good enough when the music itself is not any good. We simply, as  Bob Ohlsson says, do not have the systems in place where young people can learn the craft of pop music anymore. You have people who can&#8217;t play singing and playing stuff by people who can&#8221;t write lyrics or compose music.  </p>
<p> There are exceptions and in fact one consequence of this is that moderately good people can become superstars. Most of the superstars right now are in fact moderately to very good in historical terms. But decades ago moderately good in and of itself got you nowhere. There were tons of excellent musicians and singers out there. They knew what they were doing. They&#8217;d paid their dues and they had a place to do it. </p>
<p> I don&#8217;t know how to fix the problem. I wish I did.  But it is a fact and evading it isn&#8217;t going to do any good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
