<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Lang Audio of the 1960s	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/lang-audio-mixers-circa-1962/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/lang-audio-mixers-circa-1962/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:53:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike A.		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/lang-audio-mixers-circa-1962/#comment-629059</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike A.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 13:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4036#comment-629059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Coxsone Dodd had two LMX-2 compact mixers built into his console at Studio One. I have a great photo, but no way to attach it. Great info here, thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coxsone Dodd had two LMX-2 compact mixers built into his console at Studio One. I have a great photo, but no way to attach it. Great info here, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jesse Neel		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/lang-audio-mixers-circa-1962/#comment-590007</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse Neel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 16:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4036#comment-590007</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a model lap 1B and would like to have specs on that particular model, also I have learned that it is the lower end, but I would like to have something that would tell more about it and what it does or is. Thank you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a model lap 1B and would like to have specs on that particular model, also I have learned that it is the lower end, but I would like to have something that would tell more about it and what it does or is. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Forgotten 70s Pro Audio maker Gately Electronics &#124; Preservation Sound		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/lang-audio-mixers-circa-1962/#comment-111129</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Forgotten 70s Pro Audio maker Gately Electronics &#124; Preservation Sound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 01:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4036#comment-111129</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] noticed adverts for their EM7 mixer in the old AES journals; the EM7 had a sort-of Pultec or maybe LANG vibe, and I was curious enough that when I found one AS-IS for $100 on eBay I went for it.  You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] noticed adverts for their EM7 mixer in the old AES journals; the EM7 had a sort-of Pultec or maybe LANG vibe, and I was curious enough that when I found one AS-IS for $100 on eBay I went for it.  You [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rrusston		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/lang-audio-mixers-circa-1962/#comment-13741</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rrusston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 19:55:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4036#comment-13741</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Lang was to Ampex pro electronics what Hickok and Jetronix were to Tektronix tube oscilloscopes, or Eldico was to the Collins S/Line: a cloner, offering interchangeable less expensive stuff that worked, more or less. Some of it was satisfactory and some of it wasn&#039;t.  Ampex and Tektronix were first tier military, space, and comint/sigint vendors and their stuff was high dollar.  Others sought to make similar stuff cheaper. It was a business model that worked and it did drive costs down somewhat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lang was to Ampex pro electronics what Hickok and Jetronix were to Tektronix tube oscilloscopes, or Eldico was to the Collins S/Line: a cloner, offering interchangeable less expensive stuff that worked, more or less. Some of it was satisfactory and some of it wasn&#8217;t.  Ampex and Tektronix were first tier military, space, and comint/sigint vendors and their stuff was high dollar.  Others sought to make similar stuff cheaper. It was a business model that worked and it did drive costs down somewhat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
