<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Less But Better: The Braun TG-1000 Tape Recorder of 1970	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/less-but-better-the-braun-tg-1000-tape-recorder-of-1970/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/less-but-better-the-braun-tg-1000-tape-recorder-of-1970/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 19:30:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Bass		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/less-but-better-the-braun-tg-1000-tape-recorder-of-1970/#comment-596420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 19:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8109#comment-596420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/less-but-better-the-braun-tg-1000-tape-recorder-of-1970/#comment-502198&quot;&gt;David Bass&lt;/a&gt;.

I have owned both Revox and braun. The Braun transport has a much smoother operation. Revox electronics are much quieter, smoother with a broader bandwith...The Revox A77 has a recording character more like a studio machine than any...The braun has a delightful ease and versatility unheard of even compared to a Japanese Akai or Otari. A Buaun has the freq resp @1 7/8 using conventional tape of cassettes using metal tape. The Braun is a great machine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/less-but-better-the-braun-tg-1000-tape-recorder-of-1970/#comment-502198">David Bass</a>.</p>
<p>I have owned both Revox and braun. The Braun transport has a much smoother operation. Revox electronics are much quieter, smoother with a broader bandwith&#8230;The Revox A77 has a recording character more like a studio machine than any&#8230;The braun has a delightful ease and versatility unheard of even compared to a Japanese Akai or Otari. A Buaun has the freq resp @1 7/8 using conventional tape of cassettes using metal tape. The Braun is a great machine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Bass		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/less-but-better-the-braun-tg-1000-tape-recorder-of-1970/#comment-502198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2018 01:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8109#comment-502198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While designed by Dieter Rams, baged and marketed by Braun, the electronics, heads and all of the transport control electronics are made by Uher. The preamps, bias circuitry and heads are, infact, the same found in the Uher10000. While not as good as a ReVox, the rec/playback preamps are clean. The highs are sweet, the midrange is sweet and defined and the base is tight and resounding. The transport operates smoothly...I still own a ReVox  a77 and prefer it but the Braun has a very smooth, feel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While designed by Dieter Rams, baged and marketed by Braun, the electronics, heads and all of the transport control electronics are made by Uher. The preamps, bias circuitry and heads are, infact, the same found in the Uher10000. While not as good as a ReVox, the rec/playback preamps are clean. The highs are sweet, the midrange is sweet and defined and the base is tight and resounding. The transport operates smoothly&#8230;I still own a ReVox  a77 and prefer it but the Braun has a very smooth, feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
