<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Magnecord PT6 c.1950 used in contemporary music production	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/magnecord-pt6-c-1950-used-in-contemporary-music-production/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/magnecord-pt6-c-1950-used-in-contemporary-music-production/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:03:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Magnecord Tape Machines of the Early 1960s &#124; Preservation Sound		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/magnecord-pt6-c-1950-used-in-contemporary-music-production/#comment-144366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnecord Tape Machines of the Early 1960s &#124; Preservation Sound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3639#comment-144366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] up, made some recordings with them, and then stuck em in the studio (where they have actually been used on sessions, BION).  The circa 1963 advert you see above is no joke.  My PT6s are close to 65 years old and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] up, made some recordings with them, and then stuck em in the studio (where they have actually been used on sessions, BION).  The circa 1963 advert you see above is no joke.  My PT6s are close to 65 years old and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill Callaham		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/magnecord-pt6-c-1950-used-in-contemporary-music-production/#comment-9275</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill Callaham]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 22:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3639#comment-9275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sadly, many of the classic tape machines have been dismantled for parts or to use their record electronics for &quot;phat toob mic pre&#039;s&quot;.

 The problem with this is that they are lousy mic pre&#039;s.  Unfortunately, given the success of Steve Albini&#039;s not-very-good-sounding records, that&#039;s what people want. 

 A couple of years ago I got hold of two Ampex tube record channels that were abandoned in a storage facility. The transport had been dumpstered and I knew the guy that bought the recorder, dumpstered the transport (and he knew I wanted it!)  and then he couldn&#039;t pay the storage fee. Seems he is doing time right now. 

 When he gets out I will return them to him. But, I have furthered the theme he started by throwing away the transport and then paying someone to &quot;convert&quot; them by butchering them and making them useful for recording again only with adding parts that are now gone (and which can not be bought anymore).  I took them out to my place, put them on a stump, and put several strategically placed rounds of .300 Weatherby Magnum through each transformer, the meter movement and all the big caps.  I also cut through all the carbon comp resistors with a heavy pair of rongeurs. 

 Out of respect for the original Ampex engineers, I also ground off the Ampex logo, in the manner of surrendered Arisaka rifles missing their chrysanthemum stamp. 

 I am sure he will appreciate my thoughtfulnss and thoroughness.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, many of the classic tape machines have been dismantled for parts or to use their record electronics for &#8220;phat toob mic pre&#8217;s&#8221;.</p>
<p> The problem with this is that they are lousy mic pre&#8217;s.  Unfortunately, given the success of Steve Albini&#8217;s not-very-good-sounding records, that&#8217;s what people want. </p>
<p> A couple of years ago I got hold of two Ampex tube record channels that were abandoned in a storage facility. The transport had been dumpstered and I knew the guy that bought the recorder, dumpstered the transport (and he knew I wanted it!)  and then he couldn&#8217;t pay the storage fee. Seems he is doing time right now. </p>
<p> When he gets out I will return them to him. But, I have furthered the theme he started by throwing away the transport and then paying someone to &#8220;convert&#8221; them by butchering them and making them useful for recording again only with adding parts that are now gone (and which can not be bought anymore).  I took them out to my place, put them on a stump, and put several strategically placed rounds of .300 Weatherby Magnum through each transformer, the meter movement and all the big caps.  I also cut through all the carbon comp resistors with a heavy pair of rongeurs. </p>
<p> Out of respect for the original Ampex engineers, I also ground off the Ampex logo, in the manner of surrendered Arisaka rifles missing their chrysanthemum stamp. </p>
<p> I am sure he will appreciate my thoughtfulnss and thoroughness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
