<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Mullard 520 Power Amplifier c.1956	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:56:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: BCNZ		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-646374</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BCNZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2024 09:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-646374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-590146&quot;&gt;Jerry B. Williams&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m a bit late to the party but try this link if you don&#039;t already have the PDF:

https://www.worldradiohistory.com/BOOKSHELF-ARH/Circuits-For-Audio-Amplifiers-Mullard-1963%20.pdf]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-590146">Jerry B. Williams</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a bit late to the party but try this link if you don&#8217;t already have the PDF:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.worldradiohistory.com/BOOKSHELF-ARH/Circuits-For-Audio-Amplifiers-Mullard-1963%20.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.worldradiohistory.com/BOOKSHELF-ARH/Circuits-For-Audio-Amplifiers-Mullard-1963%20.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Douglas		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-620114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Douglas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2022 09:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-620114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HI what can I say we brits Do what we Do best this is where we excell in valve amp Design others make great amps as well but it.s mullard who started it went from there there are also great transistor amps eg leak armstrong quad etc very sought after still around the world need I say more .Happy building David Douglas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI what can I say we brits Do what we Do best this is where we excell in valve amp Design others make great amps as well but it.s mullard who started it went from there there are also great transistor amps eg leak armstrong quad etc very sought after still around the world need I say more .Happy building David Douglas</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trevor Gale (Electronics Design, Space)		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-605878</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trevor Gale (Electronics Design, Space)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2021 00:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-605878</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-78535&quot;&gt;Kurt Lilienthal Steffensen&lt;/a&gt;.

The ECC83 in the design above is NOT &#039;paralleled&#039;, the first (left) triode grid is fed with the audio signal (and bias) from the EF86 and outputs at its anode the drive for the first (upper) EL34 output valve.
The second (right) triode of the ECC83 receives only the bias D.C. voltage from the EF86 anode - as it is decoupled at audio by the capacitor to ground; this triode acts as a phase splitter as it&#039;s in common-cathode connection so outputs at its anode the drive in opposite phase to the second (bottom) EL34 output valve. That way the pair of output valves (EL34&#039;s) operate in push-pull into the output transformer, properly balanced.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-78535">Kurt Lilienthal Steffensen</a>.</p>
<p>The ECC83 in the design above is NOT &#8216;paralleled&#8217;, the first (left) triode grid is fed with the audio signal (and bias) from the EF86 and outputs at its anode the drive for the first (upper) EL34 output valve.<br />
The second (right) triode of the ECC83 receives only the bias D.C. voltage from the EF86 anode &#8211; as it is decoupled at audio by the capacitor to ground; this triode acts as a phase splitter as it&#8217;s in common-cathode connection so outputs at its anode the drive in opposite phase to the second (bottom) EL34 output valve. That way the pair of output valves (EL34&#8217;s) operate in push-pull into the output transformer, properly balanced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Xiangui Liu		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-604295</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xiangui Liu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 11:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-604295</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am looking for the Armstrong A 10 MKII Amplifier &#039;s schematic,  Can anyone offer?
Thank you!
Please contact me  liuxiangui@126.com.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am looking for the Armstrong A 10 MKII Amplifier &#8216;s schematic,  Can anyone offer?<br />
Thank you!<br />
Please contact me  <a href="mailto:liuxiangui@126.com">liuxiangui@126.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerry B. Williams		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-590146</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry B. Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-590146</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-266427&quot;&gt;Steve Calver&lt;/a&gt;.

Steve:

It&#039;s probably just me, but.....when I had &quot;Copied &#038; Pasted&quot; the URL link you have provided to download the &quot;MULLARD Circuits for Audio Amplifiers.pdf&quot;, I received the following error message:

404
The page you requested was not found.

Do you have anything more recent and/or updated? THANKS!!

JBWilliams

/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-266427">Steve Calver</a>.</p>
<p>Steve:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably just me, but&#8230;..when I had &#8220;Copied &amp; Pasted&#8221; the URL link you have provided to download the &#8220;MULLARD Circuits for Audio Amplifiers.pdf&#8221;, I received the following error message:</p>
<p>404<br />
The page you requested was not found.</p>
<p>Do you have anything more recent and/or updated? THANKS!!</p>
<p>JBWilliams</p>
<p>/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benjamin Digo		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-589202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benjamin Digo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 10:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-589202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[R9 should be 82,000 ohms, not 8,200 ohms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>R9 should be 82,000 ohms, not 8,200 ohms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: barbaro francisco		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-344832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[barbaro francisco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2015 15:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-344832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ola  econstruido infinidad amp valvulares tengo experiencia  en puss phull ultra lineal ytriodos varios desde 2a3 a6550 tambien en sigle ended mi experiencia me dice que el mejor circuito es el mullard pero tiene muchas variantes no todas suenan bien lo mejor esde entrada una 5751 sonido sedoso lo mejor como divisor defase 6sn7  desalida  desde 2a3 6b4    el34 6l6 6550 en cneccion triodo  ojo respetar tenciones y cargas  el punto clave es el inversor  alimentarlo con 430 v tension de rejilla 11o  115 v seria muy largo explicar mas detalles cualquier duda cnsultar]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ola  econstruido infinidad amp valvulares tengo experiencia  en puss phull ultra lineal ytriodos varios desde 2a3 a6550 tambien en sigle ended mi experiencia me dice que el mejor circuito es el mullard pero tiene muchas variantes no todas suenan bien lo mejor esde entrada una 5751 sonido sedoso lo mejor como divisor defase 6sn7  desalida  desde 2a3 6b4    el34 6l6 6550 en cneccion triodo  ojo respetar tenciones y cargas  el punto clave es el inversor  alimentarlo con 430 v tension de rejilla 11o  115 v seria muy largo explicar mas detalles cualquier duda cnsultar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve Calver		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-266427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve Calver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-266427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[you can download a copy for free of the Mullard Circuits for Audio Amplifiers from here:
basaudio.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/19400164-Mullard-Circuits-for-Audio-Amplifiers.pdf or 19400164-Mullard-Circuits-for-Audio-Amplifiers - BasAudio.Net]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you can download a copy for free of the Mullard Circuits for Audio Amplifiers from here:<br />
basaudio.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/19400164-Mullard-Circuits-for-Audio-Amplifiers.pdf or 19400164-Mullard-Circuits-for-Audio-Amplifiers &#8211; BasAudio.Net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: antonio carlos novelli		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-89895</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[antonio carlos novelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2013 02:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-89895</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-78535&quot;&gt;Kurt Lilienthal Steffensen&lt;/a&gt;.

Com referência ao amplificador citado por mim, que usa um circuito Mullard 520 modificado, fiz um apdate, retirei as EL34, e substitui pelas 6550, troquei os transformadores de saída por outros de 60 watts, com uma carga de primário de 4K3! Com +B de 450volts. Acho que quase consegui alcançar o &quot;santo gráu sônico&quot; Obs: as vávulas de saídas, trabalham com fixed bias!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-78535">Kurt Lilienthal Steffensen</a>.</p>
<p>Com referência ao amplificador citado por mim, que usa um circuito Mullard 520 modificado, fiz um apdate, retirei as EL34, e substitui pelas 6550, troquei os transformadores de saída por outros de 60 watts, com uma carga de primário de 4K3! Com +B de 450volts. Acho que quase consegui alcançar o &#8220;santo gráu sônico&#8221; Obs: as vávulas de saídas, trabalham com fixed bias!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: highburn		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/mullard-520-power-amplifier-c-1956/#comment-81476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[highburn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 05:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3257#comment-81476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Those old &lt;i&gt; Radio and Television News&lt;/i&gt; are more fun to read for the ads and the general flavor shown in articles, but there is still a great deal of interesting tech stuff and I&#039;d love to be able to buy them as an e-book today. It would be vitally important to scan them so that the margins are not blurred, though. 

 In this circuit, the output transformer is going to be pretty critical and it&#039;s interesting that it lists several commercial ones some of which I know to be quite different from each other. I really wonder if they built this amp and tried each of the recommended ones for stability with the component values listed.

 Would I build one today? Hard to say. I think an all triode front end would be better, especially as the EF86 was a noisy tube as I recall. Are there some more common pentodes that would give the gain needed with less noise? I&#039;ll look through my RCA Receiving Tube manuals for some ideas.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those old <i> Radio and Television News</i> are more fun to read for the ads and the general flavor shown in articles, but there is still a great deal of interesting tech stuff and I&#8217;d love to be able to buy them as an e-book today. It would be vitally important to scan them so that the margins are not blurred, though. </p>
<p> In this circuit, the output transformer is going to be pretty critical and it&#8217;s interesting that it lists several commercial ones some of which I know to be quite different from each other. I really wonder if they built this amp and tried each of the recommended ones for stability with the component values listed.</p>
<p> Would I build one today? Hard to say. I think an all triode front end would be better, especially as the EF86 was a noisy tube as I recall. Are there some more common pentodes that would give the gain needed with less noise? I&#8217;ll look through my RCA Receiving Tube manuals for some ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
