<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Multi-use vacuum-tube audio mixer circa 1960	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/multi-use-vacuum-tube-audio-mixer-circa-1960/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/multi-use-vacuum-tube-audio-mixer-circa-1960/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:19:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jesse		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/multi-use-vacuum-tube-audio-mixer-circa-1960/#comment-642072</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jun 2024 01:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3033#comment-642072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I just happen to have a s-14, and a 0-1. I just may give this a try. I did a sweep on the s-14 with no load and it didn&#039;t look so hot. Might just get replaced. What I should do is sell the s-14 and use those big bucks for more and better iron.lol
The tabs on the OT bottom in the picture do not match the s-14. So perhaps they did us a s-15. Odd as the circuit is single ended. Have you tried this yourself yet?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just happen to have a s-14, and a 0-1. I just may give this a try. I did a sweep on the s-14 with no load and it didn&#8217;t look so hot. Might just get replaced. What I should do is sell the s-14 and use those big bucks for more and better iron.lol<br />
The tabs on the OT bottom in the picture do not match the s-14. So perhaps they did us a s-15. Odd as the circuit is single ended. Have you tried this yourself yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug jackson		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/multi-use-vacuum-tube-audio-mixer-circa-1960/#comment-583164</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug jackson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2019 22:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3033#comment-583164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m trying to find schematics for a 60&#039;s lang portable mixer and equilizer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m trying to find schematics for a 60&#8217;s lang portable mixer and equilizer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/multi-use-vacuum-tube-audio-mixer-circa-1960/#comment-311659</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3033#comment-311659</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/multi-use-vacuum-tube-audio-mixer-circa-1960/#comment-311650&quot;&gt;Chris&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi chris.  some of those &#039;universal&#039; UTC O/Ps could handle DC on the primary.  I don&#039;t know for sure which ones.  but its risky.  and their frequency response sucks anyways.  if i was gonna build this, i&#039;d use a utc A25.  good luck.  c.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/multi-use-vacuum-tube-audio-mixer-circa-1960/#comment-311650">Chris</a>.</p>
<p>Hi chris.  some of those &#8216;universal&#8217; UTC O/Ps could handle DC on the primary.  I don&#8217;t know for sure which ones.  but its risky.  and their frequency response sucks anyways.  if i was gonna build this, i&#8217;d use a utc A25.  good luck.  c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/multi-use-vacuum-tube-audio-mixer-circa-1960/#comment-311650</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2015 18:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3033#comment-311650</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Might the S-15 (12W PP) output transformer specified in this schematic be a typo?  I would think that the correct UTC would be S-14 (single ended).  If this is not a typo, I&#039;m thinking of doing something similar to this with a UTC S-16 I have (30W PP) by running the DC through the whole 10K primary.  What is your call on this?  What might be the reason for specifying a S-15 instead of S-14?  

Cheers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might the S-15 (12W PP) output transformer specified in this schematic be a typo?  I would think that the correct UTC would be S-14 (single ended).  If this is not a typo, I&#8217;m thinking of doing something similar to this with a UTC S-16 I have (30W PP) by running the DC through the whole 10K primary.  What is your call on this?  What might be the reason for specifying a S-15 instead of S-14?  </p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
