<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pro Audio hardware of the early 1950s	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:40:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Atomic Analog		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-637964</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Atomic Analog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2024 13:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-637964</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It seems that Howard&#039;s info makes sense when I look through the schematic. It is a feedback limiter with feed-forward side chain. The first comment however from JesseG does not make sense. If there is a multiplication or transposition of the audio frequencies then that would need to be explained in detail. I do not see any RF-like circuit elements in there]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Howard&#8217;s info makes sense when I look through the schematic. It is a feedback limiter with feed-forward side chain. The first comment however from JesseG does not make sense. If there is a multiplication or transposition of the audio frequencies then that would need to be explained in detail. I do not see any RF-like circuit elements in there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randy Pugsley		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-607044</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randy Pugsley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2021 23:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-607044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-247566&quot;&gt;howard compton&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Howard,
I might have met you in 1970 when I worked at KXLE in north central Washington. We had a GE BA 5A limiter on the air there. It was preceded by a Gates Sta- Level. The combination worked quite well and sounded very smooth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-247566">howard compton</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Howard,<br />
I might have met you in 1970 when I worked at KXLE in north central Washington. We had a GE BA 5A limiter on the air there. It was preceded by a Gates Sta- Level. The combination worked quite well and sounded very smooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: love spells		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-416804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[love spells]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 08:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-416804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s up,I check your blog named &quot;Pro Audio hardware of the early 1950s &#124; Preservation Sound&quot; on a regular basis.Your humoristic style is witty, keep doing what you&#039;re doing! And you can look our website about love spells.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s up,I check your blog named &#8220;Pro Audio hardware of the early 1950s | Preservation Sound&#8221; on a regular basis.Your humoristic style is witty, keep doing what you&#8217;re doing! And you can look our website about love spells.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kurt Elliott		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-364301</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kurt Elliott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2016 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-364301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi!

this gear is so interesting.

I have a pair of GE A1 -301 convertible amplifier ( power + preamplifier) that looks much more professional than a home system with a lot of features and filters.

It is great to rescue and give them a good use. The sound is awesome.

best,

Kurt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>this gear is so interesting.</p>
<p>I have a pair of GE A1 -301 convertible amplifier ( power + preamplifier) that looks much more professional than a home system with a lot of features and filters.</p>
<p>It is great to rescue and give them a good use. The sound is awesome.</p>
<p>best,</p>
<p>Kurt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: howard compton		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-247566</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howard compton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 20:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-247566</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The BA 5A limiter was used to some degree in radio broadcasting stations as late as the 1970&#039;s as a peak limiter to prevent over-modulation of the carrier wave. Some stations used an AGC amplifier such as the &quot;Gates&quot; sta-level (or other) ahead of it to keep a reasonable modulation average while staying within the 10-12 db limiting range of the BA-5A, usually about 3-5db limiting. The audio delay circuit spoken of in the &quot; theory of operation&quot; section of the manual  is an all pass filter with phase rotating properties at higher frequencies. This would help to even out the positive and negative audio peaks especially on microphone voice signals which usually predominate on the positive or negative side depending on microphone phasing. This also helps to prevent over-modulation of the transmitter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The BA 5A limiter was used to some degree in radio broadcasting stations as late as the 1970&#8217;s as a peak limiter to prevent over-modulation of the carrier wave. Some stations used an AGC amplifier such as the &#8220;Gates&#8221; sta-level (or other) ahead of it to keep a reasonable modulation average while staying within the 10-12 db limiting range of the BA-5A, usually about 3-5db limiting. The audio delay circuit spoken of in the &#8221; theory of operation&#8221; section of the manual  is an all pass filter with phase rotating properties at higher frequencies. This would help to even out the positive and negative audio peaks especially on microphone voice signals which usually predominate on the positive or negative side depending on microphone phasing. This also helps to prevent over-modulation of the transmitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: howard compton		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-247392</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howard compton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 05:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-247392</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have the GE BA- 5A schematic in front of me. The input to the side chain amp ( 6J5 ) tube is taken from the plate of the second pre-amp tube. The signal phase is then split to drive two tubes in a novel push-pull cathode follower circuit to obtain a low impedance for development of the d.c. gain control voltage. This allows for an extremely fast attack time for the feed back limiter circuit. (two 6J5&#039;s between the output of the amp to the input)   As the control voltage decreases the negative bias voltage  the amount of signal fed back to the input ( being 180 deg. out of phase) increases,  decreasing the overall gain of the amp. This is a feed-back limiter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the GE BA- 5A schematic in front of me. The input to the side chain amp ( 6J5 ) tube is taken from the plate of the second pre-amp tube. The signal phase is then split to drive two tubes in a novel push-pull cathode follower circuit to obtain a low impedance for development of the d.c. gain control voltage. This allows for an extremely fast attack time for the feed back limiter circuit. (two 6J5&#8217;s between the output of the amp to the input)   As the control voltage decreases the negative bias voltage  the amount of signal fed back to the input ( being 180 deg. out of phase) increases,  decreasing the overall gain of the amp. This is a feed-back limiter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: howard compton		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-247046</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[howard compton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-247046</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have used the GE Ba-5A limiter in actual practice and even for it&#039;s age I love it. That network of inductors and capacitors in the main audio channel is an all-pass filter  circuit that rolls the phase of the higher frequencies 180 degrees. This helps to even out the positive and negative peaks , especially of the human voice. ( think Khan semetri-peak) In this case the low frequencies remain phase normal as the higher ones are spinning around the axis. The control voltage is developed ahead and parallel to the main audio, then is applied to the feedback limiter tubes in real time to vary the amount of gain. This limiter has instantaneous attack time and when working properly has a transparent sound quality. True, at 75 pounds and some new state of the art equipment that you can hold in one hand that will do all that and more, what can I say?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used the GE Ba-5A limiter in actual practice and even for it&#8217;s age I love it. That network of inductors and capacitors in the main audio channel is an all-pass filter  circuit that rolls the phase of the higher frequencies 180 degrees. This helps to even out the positive and negative peaks , especially of the human voice. ( think Khan semetri-peak) In this case the low frequencies remain phase normal as the higher ones are spinning around the axis. The control voltage is developed ahead and parallel to the main audio, then is applied to the feedback limiter tubes in real time to vary the amount of gain. This limiter has instantaneous attack time and when working properly has a transparent sound quality. True, at 75 pounds and some new state of the art equipment that you can hold in one hand that will do all that and more, what can I say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-5080</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-5080</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-5065&quot;&gt;JesseG&lt;/a&gt;.

Right.  Thank you.  this is all coming back to me now.  by multiplying the frequency of the audio signal into above-sonic level, performing the compression operation on that multiplied audio, and then bringing that compressed signal back down to the original frequency...  then you can add a VERY low high-pass filter and clear out all the thumping. right.  genius.  Just out of curiosity, Jesse, any idea what the hi-pass filter frequency is in the unit?  thanks -]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-5065">JesseG</a>.</p>
<p>Right.  Thank you.  this is all coming back to me now.  by multiplying the frequency of the audio signal into above-sonic level, performing the compression operation on that multiplied audio, and then bringing that compressed signal back down to the original frequency&#8230;  then you can add a VERY low high-pass filter and clear out all the thumping. right.  genius.  Just out of curiosity, Jesse, any idea what the hi-pass filter frequency is in the unit?  thanks &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JesseG		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/pro-audio-hardware-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-5065</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JesseG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 03:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2491#comment-5065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The GE BA-5 works by multiplying the audio path itself, so that any thumping etc becomes subsonic and gets filtered out, after the audio is divided back to the original frequencies.  While I&#039;m very glad the 660/670 happened, earlier units were already free of these issues.  The Gates Sta-Level in 1956 and Level Devil in 1957 definitely tromped the BA-5 and 660 by miles for broadcasting, by adding a gate to the compression so that it wasn&#039;t gaining up the noise floor with no other signal present.  And so started the long history of advancements in broadcast audio processing, one which 99.9% of studio engineers know little to nothing about its innovations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GE BA-5 works by multiplying the audio path itself, so that any thumping etc becomes subsonic and gets filtered out, after the audio is divided back to the original frequencies.  While I&#8217;m very glad the 660/670 happened, earlier units were already free of these issues.  The Gates Sta-Level in 1956 and Level Devil in 1957 definitely tromped the BA-5 and 660 by miles for broadcasting, by adding a gate to the compression so that it wasn&#8217;t gaining up the noise floor with no other signal present.  And so started the long history of advancements in broadcast audio processing, one which 99.9% of studio engineers know little to nothing about its innovations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
