<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Schoeps microphones of the early 1960s	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/schoeps-microphones-of-the-early-1960s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/schoeps-microphones-of-the-early-1960s/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rmburrow		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/schoeps-microphones-of-the-early-1960s/#comment-183061</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rmburrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4056#comment-183061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I repaired a Schoeps M221B which was acquired a while back in a equipment barter.  The mic was marked &quot;defective&quot; and I immediately thought it was the AC701.  Tested the cable first, and it was bad.   An hour on the bench, now the mic sounds beautiful.  Looking for another one...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I repaired a Schoeps M221B which was acquired a while back in a equipment barter.  The mic was marked &#8220;defective&#8221; and I immediately thought it was the AC701.  Tested the cable first, and it was bad.   An hour on the bench, now the mic sounds beautiful.  Looking for another one&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/schoeps-microphones-of-the-early-1960s/#comment-130031</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 17:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4056#comment-130031</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A good room and good musicians and anyone can make a good recording. RVG. QED.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good room and good musicians and anyone can make a good recording. RVG. QED.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dinos Zoumperis		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/schoeps-microphones-of-the-early-1960s/#comment-128579</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dinos Zoumperis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4056#comment-128579</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Although i generally agree with the previous commenter &#039;s views, i had the pleasure to do some recording sessions last month with a good selection of microphones, a pair of Schoeps M221F (the special French version of the M221B) sporting the switchable omni/cardioid M934 capsules being among them. 
These are the kind of microphones that can elevate your recordings from good to spectacular (a decent understanding of the technique and a good room with good musicians in it would help, too). I urge any one serious about their art to try &#038; hunt down a pair of M221. Just marvelous!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although i generally agree with the previous commenter &#8216;s views, i had the pleasure to do some recording sessions last month with a good selection of microphones, a pair of Schoeps M221F (the special French version of the M221B) sporting the switchable omni/cardioid M934 capsules being among them.<br />
These are the kind of microphones that can elevate your recordings from good to spectacular (a decent understanding of the technique and a good room with good musicians in it would help, too). I urge any one serious about their art to try &amp; hunt down a pair of M221. Just marvelous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hunt-the-wumpus		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/schoeps-microphones-of-the-early-1960s/#comment-14296</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hunt-the-wumpus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2012 02:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4056#comment-14296</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Beautiful mics, but it&#039;s my experience most studios already have too many mics and not enough experience using any of them.  

 In the old West, it was said that a man with one gun probably knew how to shoot it.  I don&#039;t advocate one mic for everything but a relatively modest mic locker-none of which need be vintage-and a good amount of experience in placing them combined with some strategic simple first order filter EQ (think no more than four resistors and two caps) will steamroller the yupster with a pile of money spent on the flashiest toys bought to impress his friends.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful mics, but it&#8217;s my experience most studios already have too many mics and not enough experience using any of them.  </p>
<p> In the old West, it was said that a man with one gun probably knew how to shoot it.  I don&#8217;t advocate one mic for everything but a relatively modest mic locker-none of which need be vintage-and a good amount of experience in placing them combined with some strategic simple first order filter EQ (think no more than four resistors and two caps) will steamroller the yupster with a pile of money spent on the flashiest toys bought to impress his friends.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Fine		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/schoeps-microphones-of-the-early-1960s/#comment-14160</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Fine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4056#comment-14160</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Schoeps M201 was the main (but not the only) mic used for the Mercury Living Presence recordings. In the mono days, starting in 1951, first it was a single Telefunken-badged Neumann U-47. But by 1953, the M201 was discovered and that became the single-mic mono pickup from then on. There were very few M201&#039;s made, so when stereo recording started,  in late 1955, it was not possible to locate six M201&#039;s (needed three for recording and three backups -- session time with an orchestra was way too expensive not to have backups for every microphone). The earliest Mercury 3-channel stereo recordings were made with a M201 in the middle and U-47&#039;s on the side. However, in early 1956, the switch was made to Neumann KM-56 on the sides. By the beginning of 1959, enough Schoeps M201&#039;s had been located so all Mercury recordings after that, through the last Living Presence in San Antonio in 1967, were made with M201&#039;s.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schoeps M201 was the main (but not the only) mic used for the Mercury Living Presence recordings. In the mono days, starting in 1951, first it was a single Telefunken-badged Neumann U-47. But by 1953, the M201 was discovered and that became the single-mic mono pickup from then on. There were very few M201&#8217;s made, so when stereo recording started,  in late 1955, it was not possible to locate six M201&#8217;s (needed three for recording and three backups &#8212; session time with an orchestra was way too expensive not to have backups for every microphone). The earliest Mercury 3-channel stereo recordings were made with a M201 in the middle and U-47&#8217;s on the side. However, in early 1956, the switch was made to Neumann KM-56 on the sides. By the beginning of 1959, enough Schoeps M201&#8217;s had been located so all Mercury recordings after that, through the last Living Presence in San Antonio in 1967, were made with M201&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
