<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sound Practices Zine Archive Available on CDR	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/sound-practices-zine-archive-available-on-cdr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/sound-practices-zine-archive-available-on-cdr/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:54:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/sound-practices-zine-archive-available-on-cdr/#comment-10974</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 23:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3767#comment-10974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most of the schematics and other &quot;hard&quot; data in SP had errors, most notably the WE 91 article in Issue 1, but in general the editing was dreadful.  Joe Roberts meant well, but a misspent youth dealing with the unmitigated twaddle of Boas, Weltfish, Mead and other cultrural anthro-pseudoscientists took a terrible toll. 

 The magazine is worth reading for giggles and an occasional useful tidbit so long as you keep in mind that most of it was written by people who don&#039;t know what they are doing, quite literally. 

 And after &quot;The Brown Bunny&quot;, Vinnie Gallo is the second most difficult person I can think of on earth to take seriously about anything. (The most difficult, and for the exact same reason, is Chloe Sevigny.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the schematics and other &#8220;hard&#8221; data in SP had errors, most notably the WE 91 article in Issue 1, but in general the editing was dreadful.  Joe Roberts meant well, but a misspent youth dealing with the unmitigated twaddle of Boas, Weltfish, Mead and other cultrural anthro-pseudoscientists took a terrible toll. </p>
<p> The magazine is worth reading for giggles and an occasional useful tidbit so long as you keep in mind that most of it was written by people who don&#8217;t know what they are doing, quite literally. </p>
<p> And after &#8220;The Brown Bunny&#8221;, Vinnie Gallo is the second most difficult person I can think of on earth to take seriously about anything. (The most difficult, and for the exact same reason, is Chloe Sevigny.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
