<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>film sound &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tag/film-sound/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:49:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Cinema Sound Circa 1953</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/cinema-sound-circa-1953/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/cinema-sound-circa-1953/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 12:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equalizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jbl]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4611</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Today: some random bits+bobs of Sound-For-Film technology of the early 1950s.  Above: the All-New JBL Theatre Sound Systems, which claim to offer the higher-fidelity needed to properly reproduce the newly-available magnetic soundtracks that were being used in 35mm film at the time.  Prior to the introduction of magnetic 35mm film soundtracks in the 1950s, all [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/JBL-ad-color.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4612" title="JBL-ad-color" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/JBL-ad-color-794x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="825" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/JBL-ad-color-794x1024.jpg 794w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/JBL-ad-color-232x300.jpg 232w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Today: some random bits+bobs of Sound-For-Film technology of the early 1950s.  Above: the All-New JBL Theatre Sound Systems, which claim to offer the higher-fidelity needed to properly reproduce the newly-available magnetic soundtracks that were being used in 35mm film at the time.  Prior to the introduction of magnetic 35mm film soundtracks in the 1950s, all film-sound was reproduced in theaters via an optical sound-track which ran alongside the edge of the film-frames.  Fidelity was limited, although I cannot say exactly to what frequency range.  Can anyone tell us what the first feature-film was to be exhibited nationwide with a magnetic soundtrack?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CE-slider-ad-color.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4613" title="CE-slider-ad-color" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CE-slider-ad-color-772x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="848" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CE-slider-ad-color-772x1024.jpg 772w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CE-slider-ad-color-226x300.jpg 226w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CinemaEng-ad-color.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4617" title="CinemaEng-ad-color" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CinemaEng-ad-color-787x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="832" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CinemaEng-ad-color-787x1024.jpg 787w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CinemaEng-ad-color-230x300.jpg 230w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a></p>
<p>Above: Cinema Engineering presents&#8230; the fader!  Straight-line attenuators have certain advantages over rotary controls, such as quicker visual feedback and a range of motion that better correlates with human bio-mechanical consideration.  Nonetheless, rotary faders remained in use in pro audio well into the late 60s.  Does anyone know who first patented and/or marketed the linear fader?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CinemaEngineer-ad-color.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4614" title="CinemaEngineer-ad-color" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CinemaEngineer-ad-color-719x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="911" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CinemaEngineer-ad-color-719x1024.jpg 719w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CinemaEngineer-ad-color-210x300.jpg 210w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Above: the Cinema Engineering 6517-E &#8216;Sound Effects Filter,&#8217; aka a high-pass and a low-pass filter both built into a single instrument.   I could find this sort of thing very useful; especially for tracking multiple &#8216;stacked&#8217; parts such as one singer delivering 7 vocal harmonies over a single phrase, as I found myself doing in a session earlier this week.  Just carve out all of the unnecessary super-high and super-low end&#8230; the 80 or 100 hz high-pass filter built into many mic preamps is certainly useful but it&#8217;s obvs not always the best cut off choice.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GlenGlenn-ad.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4615" title="GlenGlenn-ad" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GlenGlenn-ad-780x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="840" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GlenGlenn-ad-780x1024.jpg 780w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/GlenGlenn-ad-228x300.jpg 228w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Above: an advert for Glen Glenn Motion Picture Sound Co. circa 1953.  Anyone out there work for this firm?  We&#8217;d love to hear yr stories&#8230;.  drop us a line&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/RCA-ad.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4616" title="RCA-ad" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/RCA-ad-767x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="854" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/RCA-ad-767x1024.jpg 767w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/RCA-ad-224x300.jpg 224w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Above: RCA&#8217;s &#8216;film phonograph,&#8217; an apparatus that records and plays-back 35 mm magnetic sound-tracks and plays-back 35mm optical sound tracks as well.  I ended up with a couple of 16mm sound track readers at <a href="http://www.goldcoastrecorders.com/">Gold Coast Recorders</a>; not sure what to do with them.  Has anyone had any luck converting an optical-track reader into a signal processing or signal generating device?  Seems like there&#8217;s some potential to make it into  interesting experimental instrument; strobe-light-controlled oscillator perhaps?</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/cinema-sound-circa-1953/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
