<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>hifi preamps &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tag/hifi-preamps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:53:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Fairchild Model 605 Stereo Tube Phono Preamp c. 1959</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fairchild-model-605-stereo-tube-phono-preamp-c-1959/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fairchild-model-605-stereo-tube-phono-preamp-c-1959/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2015 15:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairchild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hifi preamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phono preamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technical]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=8323</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How y&#8217;all  doing on this frigid day in March,,,  so listen, srry abt not posting much new material this past year.  I&#8217;ll be frank: as phones keep getting better and better, and online content keeps getting more and more tailored TO the phone as a consequence thereof, many of us are spending less and less [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8324" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre-646x1024.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_606_pre" width="640" height="1014" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre-646x1024.jpg 646w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre-189x300.jpg 189w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_pre.jpg 995w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>How y&#8217;all  doing on this frigid day in March,,,  so listen, srry abt not posting much new material this past year.  I&#8217;ll be frank: as phones keep getting better and better, and online content keeps getting more and more tailored TO the phone as a consequence thereof, many of us are spending less and less recreational time in front of the laptop <em>(although I am still planted in front of some sort of Mac, invariably, for my production and composing work,,,) </em>and more of that &#8216;leisure&#8217; time with the phone.  <a href="https://instagram.com/preservationsound/" target="_blank">Instagram</a> rather than &#8216;scoping blogs&#8217; seems better tailored to how most folks are spending their recreational internet time these days.  So we&#8217;ve been keeping an active+vigorous presence up there.  This blog isn&#8217;t going away, but do check out the <a href="https://instagram.com/preservationsound/" target="_blank">IG account</a> if you have not yet.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8325" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output-1024x794.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_606_PS_output" width="640" height="496" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output-1024x794.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output-300x233.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606_PS_output.jpg 1350w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Ok NEways,,, I was diggin thru the archive for something today and I came across the schematic for a phono preamp that Fairchild offered around 1959 &#8211; their model 605.  Strangely enough, their prototype (image at head) was labeled &#8216;606.&#8217;  Production examples do bear the mark 605, though, as this example from a Russian website indicates:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8326" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_606" width="598" height="366" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606.jpg 598w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_606-300x184.jpg 300w" sizes="(max-width: 598px) 100vw, 598px" /></a>(<a href="http://www.soundup.ru/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1446:fairchild-model-605-tube-turntable-phono-preamp&amp;catid=11:pre-amplifier&amp;directory=14" target="_blank"><em>image source</em></a>)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">There is very little information on the web about this unit &#8211; in fact, a google search offers,,, good &#8216;ole Preservation Sound Dot Com as its first result when queried.  And not much else of relevance.  We apparently ran an advert for this very unit some years back (<a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4024" target="_blank">click here for that earlier post</a>).  So I was very excited to see that this unit, which is VERY buildable using off-the-shelf components, had not yet &#8216;migrated&#8217; onto the web.  The Fairchild 606 offers both MC and MM input stages, 600ohm balanced outputs, and selectable EQ curves and stereo or true mono LP operation.  Now, I&#8217;ve built many Marantz and RCA-style tube phono preamps to great success, but this Fairchild is simultaneously exotic AND obtainable enough to be quite intriguing.   So, DIYers of the world, here ya go:  knock yrself out:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-8328" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic-1024x620.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic" width="640" height="388" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic-1024x620.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_phonoPre_Schematic-300x182.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>(click on image for a (<em>huge</em>) full size image)</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">There&#8217;s nothing exotic in it: no custom inductors, weird-taper pots, or un-source-able transformers.  The toughest thing to find might be the 4P/6T switch, but you could always sub in a pair of 2P/6T switches and just <em>use two hands</em>.  In fact, the input transformers, which I can confirm are 1:20 from the 600 ohm tap, appear to be garden-variety Beyers:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_inputTrans.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8327" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_inputTrans.jpg" alt="Fairchild_605_inputTrans" width="567" height="294" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_inputTrans.jpg 567w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Fairchild_605_inputTrans-300x156.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 567px) 100vw, 567px" /></a><em>(<a href="http://www.soundup.ru/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=1446:fairchild-model-605-tube-turntable-phono-preamp&amp;catid=11:pre-amplifier&amp;directory=14" target="_blank">image source</a>)</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Regardless, though, you can use any hi-fidelity input transformer with a roughly 1:20 ratio and an input impedance approx.  10X whatever the output impedance of your moving-coil cartridge is.  And if you only use a moving-magnet cartridge, you can skip that part of the circuit entirely and just build the 47K ohm grid-input stage (and all that follows).  As the schematic indicates and the images confirm, this product was built in two chassis:  (preamps+EQs) and (power supply+output stages).  Other details: R109 and R209 are level controls, basic voltage dividers with a 20db range.  EQ offered is flat, RIAA, or RIAA plus add&#8217;l roll-off, and the &#8216;Lateral&#8217; switching positions offered cancel out the vertical tracking information, resulting in the cleanest possible sound from mono records.  The output stage is fairly conventional, but interestingly enough requires single-ended transformers, so you will be rather limited in your options here (a 15K:600 that can handle 8ma DC unbalanced, such as a UTC A25, should work fine).</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">This is a fairly advanced project, which I have personally not built (yet). I cannot offer any technical support or help with this.  If you have never built a vacuum-tube phono preamp or mic preamp from scratch before, I would not advise undertaking this project.  Good luck, and if you build one, send us some pics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-fairchild-model-605-stereo-tube-phono-preamp-c-1959/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>BGW 103 and 203 Hi-Fi Preamps circa 1979</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/bgw-103-and-203-hi-fi-preamps-circa-1979/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/bgw-103-and-203-hi-fi-preamps-circa-1979/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2013 12:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Antique Hi-Fi Archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BGW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hifi preamps]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Download the original sales fliers for the BGW 103 and 203 hi-fi preamps: DOWNLOAD 103:BGW_103 DOWNLOAD 203:BGW_203 BGW was best known for their range of pro-audio power amps, which sold in pretty good numbers if the quantity of still-surviving units is any indication.  I had not been aware they also made hi-fi kit.  Anyone?]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_203_preamp.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-6873" alt="BGW_203_preamp" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_203_preamp-1024x398.jpg" width="640" height="248" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_203_preamp-1024x398.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_203_preamp-300x116.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_203_preamp.jpg 1677w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Download the original sales fliers for the BGW 103 and 203 hi-fi preamps:</p>
<p>DOWNLOAD 103:<a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_103.pdf">BGW_103</a></p>
<p>DOWNLOAD 203:<a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_203.pdf">BGW_203</a></p>
<p>BGW was best known for their range of pro-audio power amps, which sold in pretty good numbers if the quantity of still-surviving units is any indication.  I had not been aware they also made hi-fi kit.  Anyone?</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_103_preamp.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-6871" alt="BGW_103_preamp" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_103_preamp-1024x436.jpg" width="640" height="272" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_103_preamp-1024x436.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_103_preamp-300x127.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/BGW_103_preamp.jpg 1614w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/bgw-103-and-203-hi-fi-preamps-circa-1979/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
