<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>korg &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tag/korg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:50:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Keyboards of the Seventies part II</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/keyboards-of-the-seventies-part-ii/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/keyboards-of-the-seventies-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Synthesizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bladwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hohner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[univox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vintage synthesizers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7733</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Above: What the holy F is this thing? Today: yet another installment in our ongoing series on Keyboard of the 1970s.  Click here for part one.  As per usual, if you are still using these things today, drop us a line and let us know!  Except for the Rhodes.  There&#8217;s nothing new to say about [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Contessa_2.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7735" alt="Contessa_2" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Contessa_2-969x1024.jpg" width="640" height="676" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Contessa_2-969x1024.jpg 969w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Contessa_2-284x300.jpg 284w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Contessa_2.jpg 1014w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>Above: What the holy F is this thing?</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Today: yet another installment in our ongoing series on Keyboard of the 1970s.  <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2641" target="_blank">Click here for part one</a>.  As per usual, if you are still using these things today, drop us a line and let us know!  <em>Except for the Rhodes</em>.  There&#8217;s nothing new to say about those fkkn things.  So keep yr Rhodes to yrself thanks.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Univox_Compac_piano_1972.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7743" alt="Univox_Compac_piano_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Univox_Compac_piano_1972-1024x718.jpg" width="640" height="448" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Univox_Compac_piano_1972-1024x718.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Univox_Compac_piano_1972-300x210.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Univox_Compac_piano_1972.jpg 1383w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>Above: the Univox Compac Piano.  We had one of these things for a minute in high school.  I think it was $100.  Really terrible sound.  <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/?p=3433" target="_blank">Click here for previous coverage of this atrocity</a>.  </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1977.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7742" alt="Rhodes_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1977-819x1024.jpg" width="640" height="800" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1977-819x1024.jpg 819w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1977-240x300.jpg 240w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1977.jpg 1648w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a> <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7741" alt="Rhodes_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1972-828x1024.jpg" width="640" height="791" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1972-828x1024.jpg 828w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1972-242x300.jpg 242w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Rhodes_1972.jpg 1602w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>Above: the two worst ads Fender ever ran for the Rhodes.  &#8217;77 and &#8217;72.</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Novaline_piano_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7740" alt="Novaline_piano_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Novaline_piano_1977.jpg" width="917" height="982" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Novaline_piano_1977.jpg 917w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Novaline_piano_1977-280x300.jpg 280w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 917px) 100vw, 917px" /></a><em>Above: The Novaline Piano circa &#8217;77. Never seen one.  Anyone?  </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/MaxiKorg_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7739" alt="MaxiKorg_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/MaxiKorg_1977-474x1024.jpg" width="474" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/MaxiKorg_1977-474x1024.jpg 474w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/MaxiKorg_1977-139x300.jpg 139w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 474px) 100vw, 474px" /></a><em>Above: The KORG Maxi-Korg circa &#8217;77.  Looks pretty cool.  Any of these still working?</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7737" alt="Hohner_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_1977-805x1024.jpg" width="640" height="814" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_1977-805x1024.jpg 805w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_1977-236x300.jpg 236w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_1977.jpg 1371w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>Above: Hohner made many keyboards besides the famous Clavinet.  For instance,,,</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_Contessa_96_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7738" alt="Hohner_Contessa_96_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_Contessa_96_1972-810x1024.jpg" width="640" height="809" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_Contessa_96_1972-810x1024.jpg 810w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_Contessa_96_1972-237x300.jpg 237w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Hohner_Contessa_96_1972.jpg 1497w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>&#8230;The Contessa of 1972.  Farfisa-type organ with accordion chord-buttons in the left hand.  Yikes. </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Baldwin_SynthaSound_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7734" alt="Baldwin_SynthaSound_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Baldwin_SynthaSound_1972-1024x869.jpg" width="640" height="543" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Baldwin_SynthaSound_1972-1024x869.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Baldwin_SynthaSound_1972-300x254.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Baldwin_SynthaSound_1972.jpg 1489w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>Next time you see one of those shitty old Baldwin living-room-organs at the goodwill, take a 2nd look: it might have the SynthaSound option boards.  Wacky sounds ensue.  </em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Elka_Stringchoir_1977.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-7736" alt="Elka_Stringchoir_1977" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Elka_Stringchoir_1977.jpg" width="505" height="968" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Elka_Stringchoir_1977.jpg 505w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Elka_Stringchoir_1977-156x300.jpg 156w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 505px) 100vw, 505px" /></a><em>Above: The ELKA #8609 String Choir.  My K2500 has a bunch of ELKA patches and I kinda like em.  Anyone use the 8609?  How does it compare to other string synths of the era?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/keyboards-of-the-seventies-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Synthesizers photographed on stone-colored backgrounds</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/synthesizers-photographed-on-stone-colored-backgrounds/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/synthesizers-photographed-on-stone-colored-backgrounds/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2012 11:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Synthesizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio semiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=5020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As the first in a series of &#8220;Brief Trends in Visual Culture,&#8221; we bring you: synthesizers photographed on stone-colored backgrounds.  Pictured above: Roland  S50, Korg SG1, EMU Emax SE and Emulator 3.  If anyone can explain the significance of the all the stone-gray backgrounds, please let us know.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_RolandS50.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5021" title="Stone_RolandS50" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_RolandS50-889x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="737" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_RolandS50-889x1024.jpg 889w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_RolandS50-260x300.jpg 260w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_RolandS50.jpg 1584w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Korg_SG1.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5022" title="Stone_Korg_SG1" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Korg_SG1-1024x204.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="127" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Korg_SG1-1024x204.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Korg_SG1-300x60.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Korg_SG1.jpg 1364w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_EmaxSE.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5023" title="Stone_EmaxSE" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_EmaxSE-1024x709.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="443" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_EmaxSE-1024x709.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_EmaxSE-300x207.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_EmaxSE.jpg 1156w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Emulator3.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-5024" title="Stone_Emulator3" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Emulator3-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Emulator3-1024x768.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Emulator3-300x225.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Stone_Emulator3.jpg 1336w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>As the first in a series of &#8220;Brief Trends in Visual Culture,&#8221; we bring you: synthesizers photographed on stone-colored backgrounds.  Pictured above: Roland  S50, Korg SG1, EMU Emax SE and Emulator 3.  If anyone can explain the significance of the all the stone-gray backgrounds, please let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/synthesizers-photographed-on-stone-colored-backgrounds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>1981: Battle of the &#8217;55s</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/1981-battle-of-the-55s/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/1981-battle-of-the-55s/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Synthesizers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beatboxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[korg]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=4636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1981: Korg and Roland both release prosumer drum machines designated 55.  The KORG KR-55 is a non-programmable drum machine with many preset patterns and individual volume controls for each sound.  Regardless of what this advert claims, trust me, this thing does not remotely sound like an acoustic drum kit.  The sounds are pretty charming tho.  [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Korg_KR55_1981.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4637" title="Korg_KR55_1981" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Korg_KR55_1981-798x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="821" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Korg_KR55_1981-798x1024.jpg 798w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Korg_KR55_1981-233x300.jpg 233w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/boss_dr55_1981.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-4638" title="boss_dr55_1981" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/boss_dr55_1981-706x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="928" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/boss_dr55_1981-706x1024.jpg 706w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/boss_dr55_1981-206x300.jpg 206w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>1981: Korg and Roland both release prosumer drum machines designated 55.  The KORG KR-55 is a non-programmable drum machine with many preset patterns and individual volume controls for each sound.  Regardless of what this advert claims, trust me, this thing does not remotely sound like an acoustic drum kit.  The sounds are pretty charming tho.  I had one of these for years and now i have somehow ended up with only an empty KR55 box.  The Boss (ROLAND) DR-55 is quite different: despite the very crude prototype-esque appearance, the DR-55 is a programmable drum machine.  We have one of these at <a href="http://www.goldcoastrecorders.com/" target="_blank">Gold Coast Recorders</a> and while it seems to be overlooked in favor of our TR606, it is a worthy unit.  For some odd reason the DR55 seems to command a higher price than the 606 on eBay.  Anyone have an idea why?  Has the DR55 been embraced by a leading contemporary artist?<br />
</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/1981-battle-of-the-55s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
