<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>kurzweil &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tag/kurzweil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:17:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Musician Magazine 1976 -1999</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/musician-magazine-1976-1999/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/musician-magazine-1976-1999/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kurzweil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sennhesier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tascam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the 4-track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yamaha]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What if I told you that there was a music magazine which featured writers including rock-lit luminaries Lester Bangs and Cameron Crowe; exceptionally strong graphic design; and coverage of the most successful mainstream and most vital &#8216;underground&#8217; artists of the day; all aimed not at music fans, but at musicians themselves.  This publication was called, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/MusicianMag_0885_cover.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2100" title="MusicianMag_0885_cover" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/MusicianMag_0885_cover-787x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="832" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/MusicianMag_0885_cover-787x1024.jpg 787w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/MusicianMag_0885_cover-230x300.jpg 230w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/MusicianMag_0885_cover.jpg 1628w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>What if I told you that there was a music magazine which featured writers including rock-lit luminaries Lester Bangs and Cameron Crowe; exceptionally strong graphic design; and coverage of the most successful mainstream and most vital &#8216;underground&#8217; artists of the day; all aimed not at music fans, but at musicians themselves.  This publication was called, plainly, MUSICIAN, and it&#8217;s worth a look.   From <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musician_%28magazine%29" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em>&#8220;<strong>Musician</strong> &#8230;was a monthly magazine that covered news and information about American popular music. Initially called &#8220;Music America&#8221;, it was founded in 1976 by Sam Holdsworth and Gordon Baird. (&#8230;) Subtitled &#8220;The Art, Business and Technology of Making Music,&#8221; it became known for its extended and thorough articles about the stars of rock music. &#8220;Musician&#8221; was not intended to be a fan magazine—the founders envisioned it as a publication about the musician&#8217;s craft, and as a result, it earned it the respect of people in the music business.  As Holdsworth told an interviewer in 2003, the magazine &#8220;&#8230;created a level of trust that made the musicians feel they were talking with peers.&#8221; In that same article, he noted that &#8220;Musician&#8221; was also known for finding out the little things that the average magazine did not—such as why a musician chose a particular brand of instrument, or what was the inspiration for a certain song.&#8221;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><em><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DeadKennedys_MusicianMag_0885.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2101" title="DeadKennedys_MusicianMag_0885" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DeadKennedys_MusicianMag_0885-570x1024.jpg" alt="" width="570" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DeadKennedys_MusicianMag_0885-570x1024.jpg 570w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/DeadKennedys_MusicianMag_0885-167x300.jpg 167w" sizes="(max-width: 570px) 100vw, 570px" /></a>The Dead Kennedys in MUSICIAN, August 1985<br />
</em></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I have always been struck by how much more candid musicians are when speaking to musician-oriented publications rather than the popular or music-fan press.  Old issues of Guitar Player magazine come to mind in this regard.  MUSICIAN mag offers much of the same.  The intended audience here is musicians, specifically; not recording engineers; but there is still some interesting historical bits for audio fans.  If you chance upon a pile of old issues, pick em up.   Some revealing advertising from the August 1985 issue:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Tascam_Porta01_ad.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2102" title="Tascam_Porta01_ad" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Tascam_Porta01_ad-918x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="713" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Tascam_Porta01_ad-918x1024.jpg 918w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Tascam_Porta01_ad-269x300.jpg 269w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Tascam_Porta01_ad.jpg 1581w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>The Tascam Porta 01, which was a lower-priced alternative to their 144/244/246 cassette four-track.  Note the light of God/Genius/Art streaming through the windows.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Kurzweil_250_ad.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2103" title="Kurzweil_250_ad" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Kurzweil_250_ad-833x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="786" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Kurzweil_250_ad-833x1024.jpg 833w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Kurzweil_250_ad-244x300.jpg 244w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Kurzweil_250_ad.jpg 1610w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>I studied composition at university, and we were taught on the Kurzwel K2500, which was a very high-end synth/sampler in 1995 (approx. $5000 loaded).  This is spare change in comparison to the Kurzweil 250 of 1985 (pictured above), which sold for$14,000 &#8211; $16,000.  That&#8217;s THIRTY ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS in today&#8217;s money.  Good lord.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Sennheiser_421_441_431.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2104" title="Sennheiser_421_441_431" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Sennheiser_421_441_431-758x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="864" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Sennheiser_421_441_431-758x1024.jpg 758w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Sennheiser_421_441_431-222x300.jpg 222w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Sennheiser_421_441_431.jpg 1528w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>We&#8217;ve looked at a lot of 1960s and 1970s  Sennhesier 421 ads on this site; here is an 80&#8217;s iteration, complete with the &#8216;blackfire&#8217; 441 of the era.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Yamaha_PM_mixers_ad.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-2105" title="Yamaha_PM_mixers_ad" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Yamaha_PM_mixers_ad-779x1024.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="841" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Yamaha_PM_mixers_ad-779x1024.jpg 779w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Yamaha_PM_mixers_ad-228x300.jpg 228w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Yamaha_PM_mixers_ad.jpg 1590w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>There is a lot of emphasis in the advertising on &#8216;professional,&#8217; &#8216;career,&#8217; &#8216;making it happen,&#8217; etc.  Not sure if we can read this as an appearance of the unavoidable-in-the-1980&#8217;s &#8216;yuppie&#8217; zeitgeist but it certainly stands out today as odd language to find in a musician (artist) space, which we generally populate with romantic &#8216;creative&#8217; and &#8216;expressive&#8217; concepts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/musician-magazine-1976-1999/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
