<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>reviews &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tag/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:13:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Read my review of the AKG D12 VR and 451 &#8217;65th Anniv.&#8217; Mics at ProductionHUB</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/read-my-review-of-the-akg-d12-vr-and-451-65th-anniv-mics-at-productionhub/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/read-my-review-of-the-akg-d12-vr-and-451-65th-anniv-mics-at-productionhub/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Microphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AKG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6432</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I recently reviewed the new (-ish) AKG &#8220;65th anniversary&#8221; model 451 and the very interesting D12 &#8216;VR&#8217; model for our friends at ProductionHUB.  Click here to read the article.  The 451 &#8217;65th,&#8217; in particular, is an excellent deal for $400.  I&#8217;ve been using it every day and it is yet to disappoint.   If you are [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/C451_with_acc.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-6433" alt="C451_with_acc" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/C451_with_acc-1024x825.jpg" width="640" height="515" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/C451_with_acc-1024x825.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/C451_with_acc-300x241.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/C451_with_acc.jpg 1589w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>I recently reviewed the new (-ish) AKG &#8220;65th anniversary&#8221; model 451 and the very interesting D12 &#8216;VR&#8217; model for our friends at <a href="http://blog.productionhub.com/post/49180956686/review-akg-c451-65th-anniversary-d12vr-microphones" target="_blank">ProductionHUB.  Click here to read the article.</a>  The 451 &#8217;65th,&#8217; in particular, is an excellent deal<a href="http://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/C451B65" target="_blank"> for $400</a>.  I&#8217;ve been using it every day and it is yet to disappoint.   If you are not aware of the new D12 and its remote-controlled frequency-contouring, you might find that interesting as well.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/D12VR.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-6434" alt="D12VR" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/D12VR-862x1024.jpg" width="640" height="760" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/D12VR-862x1024.jpg 862w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/D12VR-252x300.jpg 252w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/D12VR.jpg 1905w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/read-my-review-of-the-akg-d12-vr-and-451-65th-anniv-mics-at-productionhub/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
