<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>stephens &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tag/stephens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 00:13:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Stephens Electronics, maker of the 40-track analog multitrack machine (1973)</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/stephens-electronics-maker-of-the-40-track-analog-multitrack-machine-1973/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/stephens-electronics-maker-of-the-40-track-analog-multitrack-machine-1973/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tape machines]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6079</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Commercially-released albums were made on 24-track tape machines for a very long period of time, approximately 1971 &#8211; 1995.  Now, before 24-track machines were available there was always the possibility of ping-pong&#8217;ing, which can get you 8 solid-sounding tracks on a 4-track machine (and at least 20 on an 8-track) , and at some point [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_40_track_1973.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-6086" alt="Stephens_40_track_1973" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_40_track_1973-744x1024.jpg" width="640" height="880" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_40_track_1973-744x1024.jpg 744w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_40_track_1973-218x300.jpg 218w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_40_track_1973.jpg 1569w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Commercially-released albums were made on 24-track tape machines for a very long period of time, approximately 1971 &#8211; 1995.  Now, before 24-track machines were available there was always the possibility of ping-pong&#8217;ing, which can get you 8 solid-sounding tracks on a 4-track machine (and at least 20 on an 8-track) , and at some point in the 70s engineers were able to lockup two 24-track machines to get, I imagine, 46 tracks of audio plus timecode.  But as early as 1973, Stephens Electronics of Burbank offered another solution: a 40-track, 30 IPS 2&#8243; tape machine that still promised 40 &#8211; 2oK response.  Users of these machines apparently included Leon Russell and Roy Thomas Baker; can anyone positively confirm any well-known records that were made on the Stephens 40-track?</p>
<p>A helpful dude has made the original Stephens catalog/spec sheet available online; <a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=12&amp;sqi=2&amp;ved=0CHIQFjAL&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dvq.com%2Fhifi%2Fimages%2Fstephens.pdf&amp;ei=Ic8OUZiPG-eT0QHK74GADw&amp;usg=AFQjCNE0RWCJfxo12gslpYJbgM0Omb7Ofw&amp;bvm=bv.41867550,d.dmg&amp;cad=rja" target="_blank">click here to download the PDF</a> (<em>not my link</em>).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s get back to that advert tho&#8230;  WTF is going on here?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/moody.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6084" alt="moody" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/moody.jpg" width="411" height="451" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/moody.jpg 411w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/moody-273x300.jpg 273w" sizes="(max-width: 411px) 100vw, 411px" /></a><em>Pensive lady</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/dragging.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-6083" alt="dragging" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/dragging-1024x842.jpg" width="640" height="526" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/dragging-1024x842.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/dragging-300x246.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/dragging.jpg 1475w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>Drags 132lb tape deck along beach</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Greek.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-6082" alt="Greek" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Greek.jpg" width="838" height="248" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Greek.jpg 838w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Greek-300x88.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 838px) 100vw, 838px" /></a><em>Nonsensical &#8216;greek&#8217; placeholder copy tells us nothing</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/headline.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-6085" alt="headline" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/headline-1024x387.jpg" width="640" height="241" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/headline-1024x387.jpg 1024w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/headline-300x113.jpg 300w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/headline.jpg 1124w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a><em>Headline hails the freaks</em></p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Aphrodite-Fowler.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class=" wp-image-6081 alignleft" alt="Aphrodite Fowler" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Aphrodite-Fowler.jpg" width="360" height="235" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Aphrodite-Fowler.jpg 1000w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Aphrodite-Fowler-300x196.jpg 300w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 360px) 100vw, 360px" /></a>There&#8217;s clearly some sort of Venus/Aphrodite metaphor at work here, but what exactly IT ALL MEANS remains a mystery (<em>at left, a painting of Aphrodite by Fowler</em>).  I could find one other similar-period Stephens advert, and it&#8217;s a little quirky, but not as bizarre as beach-lady.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_ad_1974.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-6080" alt="Stephens_ad_1974" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_ad_1974-816x1024.jpg" width="640" height="803" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_ad_1974-816x1024.jpg 816w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_ad_1974-239x300.jpg 239w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Stephens_ad_1974.jpg 1586w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Any of y&#8217;all using these machines nowadays?</p>
<p>Many former Stephens users report that the machines compare well to Studer and Ampex in terms of sonics.  They were also designed for utmost mechanical and electronic reliability; designer John Stephens apparently had a background in aerospace engineering.  The machines seem to be few and far between these days, commanding prices well above that of similar vintage Studers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/stephens-electronics-maker-of-the-40-track-analog-multitrack-machine-1973/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
