<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tape echo &#8211; Preservation Sound</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tag/tape-echo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:20:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Maestro FX units of 1972</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/maestro-fx-units-of-1972/</link>
					<comments>https://www.preservationsound.com/maestro-fx-units-of-1972/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2014 12:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar Equipment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maestro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tape echo]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Today at PS dot com: just a quick look at some of the state-of-the-art in guitar/keyboard FX of 1972, courtesy the Maestro division of Chicago Musical Instruments, also parent to the Gibson brand of instruments.  Maestro made a lot wackier stuff than even the above-depicted Rover (a mini-leslie-on-a-stick) &#8211; Rhythm and Sound, anyone? &#8211; and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972.jpg"><img fetchpriority="high" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7800" alt="Maestro_Rover_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972-799x1024.jpg" width="640" height="820" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972-799x1024.jpg 799w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972-234x300.jpg 234w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Rover_1972.jpg 1613w" sizes="(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Today at PS dot com: just a quick look at some of the state-of-the-art in guitar/keyboard FX of 1972, courtesy the Maestro division of Chicago Musical Instruments, also parent to the Gibson brand of instruments.  Maestro made a lot wackier stuff than even the above-depicted Rover (a mini-leslie-on-a-stick) &#8211; <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Maestro_1969.jpg" target="_blank">Rhythm and Sound, anyone?</a> &#8211; and we&#8217;ll get to it all eventually.  <em>There&#8217;s only so much past I can write about, people&#8230;</em></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7801" alt="Maestro_sustainer_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972-496x1024.jpg" width="496" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972-496x1024.jpg 496w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972-145x300.jpg 145w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_sustainer_1972.jpg 980w" sizes="(max-width: 496px) 100vw, 496px" /></a>Above: This does not appear to be a legitimate doctor. At best, he will likely &#8216;goose&#8217; you whilst you are subdued via anesthesia.  I don&#8217;t really understand why a sleazy physician makes a good metaphor for a compression pedal.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Fuzztone_1972.jpg"><img decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7798" alt="Maestro_Fuzztone_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Fuzztone_1972-502x1024.jpg" width="502" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Fuzztone_1972-502x1024.jpg 502w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Fuzztone_1972-147x300.jpg 147w" sizes="(max-width: 502px) 100vw, 502px" /></a>Above: SuperFuzz.  It&#8217;s like a smug cop.  Ok&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_RingMod_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7799" alt="Maestro_RingMod_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_RingMod_1972-470x1024.jpg" width="470" height="1024" /></a>Above: the Maestro Ring Modulator.  This is a rare one, I believe.  Do you get the feeling that this advert tells NOTHING about what this thing actually sounds like, other than it makes &#8216;unheard of sounds?&#8217;  This is likely because ring mod is really very hard to describe in words, and its effects really can be incredibly varied.  It actually synthesizes new pitches by outputting the sum and difference (in hertz) of your monophonic performance input and some second signal &#8211; in this case, likely an internal &#8216;carrier&#8217; oscillator whose pitch is determined by the panel fader there.  I love ring mod.  It&#8217;s great that a few companies (Moog, EH) are making ring mod pedals again. A truly wild sound with a ton of applications for modern music.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7796" alt="Echoplex_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972-792x1024.jpg" width="640" height="827" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972-792x1024.jpg 792w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972-232x300.jpg 232w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Echoplex_1972.jpg 1646w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px" /></a>Above: The Echoplex line of 1972.  The EM-1, ES-2, and EP-3.  Better than hanging out in a trash can.  Kinda need one of these.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972.jpg"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-7797" alt="Maestro_Brassmaster_1972" src="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972-519x1024.jpg" width="519" height="1024" srcset="https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972-519x1024.jpg 519w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972-152x300.jpg 152w, https://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Maestro_Brassmaster_1972.jpg 1026w" sizes="auto, (max-width: 519px) 100vw, 519px" /></a>Above: The Bass Brassmaster.  Tuba/trombone/bass sax players end up homeless/hobos/vagrants as a result.  Great, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.preservationsound.com/maestro-fx-units-of-1972/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
