<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tascam 144 4-Track c.1979: Original Catalog	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:19:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Donald Lang		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-599779</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald Lang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2020 20:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-599779</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looking for a 144 - email me at donnylang@gmail.com if you have any leads!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for a 144 &#8211; email me at <a href="mailto:donnylang@gmail.com">donnylang@gmail.com</a> if you have any leads!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-582042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 20:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-582042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-416291&quot;&gt;Charlie&lt;/a&gt;.

This is an old comment, but you can find them on eBay and Craigslist or occasionally Reverb sometimes. Unfortunately because of their age they need more work than any other model. I currently have one that I replaced all four belts on and cleaned and lubricated all the pots and faders, but discovered a signal issue as well as the fact that all the PCB’S need to be recapped. I’m gonna do it because that machine is awesome - they never made one that had better preamps than that (the 244’s come kinda close), even if the Dolby B was less than amazing.  Give one of those sites a shot and I’m sure you’ll find one - Tascam might even be able to fix it themselves if you’re willing to pay the extra $$$ to ship it to their repair shop in CA. Good luck finding one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-416291">Charlie</a>.</p>
<p>This is an old comment, but you can find them on eBay and Craigslist or occasionally Reverb sometimes. Unfortunately because of their age they need more work than any other model. I currently have one that I replaced all four belts on and cleaned and lubricated all the pots and faders, but discovered a signal issue as well as the fact that all the PCB’S need to be recapped. I’m gonna do it because that machine is awesome &#8211; they never made one that had better preamps than that (the 244’s come kinda close), even if the Dolby B was less than amazing.  Give one of those sites a shot and I’m sure you’ll find one &#8211; Tascam might even be able to fix it themselves if you’re willing to pay the extra $$$ to ship it to their repair shop in CA. Good luck finding one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JFairweather		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-517514</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JFairweather]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2018 22:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-517514</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[There were two really excellent things about this unit. One was that you could flip the taps for reverse playback. If you bounce with some delay, then flip the tape back over you  can get a great &quot;prescience&quot; effect. Also, the speed control made manual flanging easy - Import a prerecorded drum track, then import it again in another channel while making slight changes to tape speed. With practice you could make the crossover at the point of a cymbal hit for a fantastic stereo sweep.

I must have done a couple of hundred tracks with this, some of which as elaborate as the best of the Beatles. If it were not for the ultra-thin tape width, it would have sounded just as good as well.

I had to toss mine after eight years because the electronics aged quickly, introducing an intolerable amount of circuit hiss. I didn&#039;t upgrade, as I had spent 5 years in Africa on a limited budget. Back in the States I tried to replace it but after careful research I ended up with a Yamaha version - better in many ways, plus it was compatible with my old Tascam tapes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were two really excellent things about this unit. One was that you could flip the taps for reverse playback. If you bounce with some delay, then flip the tape back over you  can get a great &#8220;prescience&#8221; effect. Also, the speed control made manual flanging easy &#8211; Import a prerecorded drum track, then import it again in another channel while making slight changes to tape speed. With practice you could make the crossover at the point of a cymbal hit for a fantastic stereo sweep.</p>
<p>I must have done a couple of hundred tracks with this, some of which as elaborate as the best of the Beatles. If it were not for the ultra-thin tape width, it would have sounded just as good as well.</p>
<p>I had to toss mine after eight years because the electronics aged quickly, introducing an intolerable amount of circuit hiss. I didn&#8217;t upgrade, as I had spent 5 years in Africa on a limited budget. Back in the States I tried to replace it but after careful research I ended up with a Yamaha version &#8211; better in many ways, plus it was compatible with my old Tascam tapes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eric Unbekannt		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-507813</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Unbekannt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 14:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-507813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-416291&quot;&gt;Charlie&lt;/a&gt;.

Hello, the 244 was equipped with DBX Noise reduction, while the 144 has DOLBY! And that speed problem....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-416291">Charlie</a>.</p>
<p>Hello, the 244 was equipped with DBX Noise reduction, while the 144 has DOLBY! And that speed problem&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: staffan astner		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-445951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[staffan astner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 10:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-445951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-416291&quot;&gt;Charlie&lt;/a&gt;.

Charlie, did you find one yet?
I have one for sale. I´m based in Stockholm, Sweden.
/Staffan Astner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-416291">Charlie</a>.</p>
<p>Charlie, did you find one yet?<br />
I have one for sale. I´m based in Stockholm, Sweden.<br />
/Staffan Astner</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Charlie		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-416291</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charlie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2017 08:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-416291</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Does anyone know where I can find a working Teac Tascam 144 Portastudio? I don&#039;t care what it costs. I have a number of half finished songs I recorded on one (which gave up the ghost) back in the late 70&#039;s and early 80&#039;s  but they don&#039;t work on the 244 which I later bought. The speed is different, and I think something else too. My work tapes are not compatible.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know where I can find a working Teac Tascam 144 Portastudio? I don&#8217;t care what it costs. I have a number of half finished songs I recorded on one (which gave up the ghost) back in the late 70&#8217;s and early 80&#8217;s  but they don&#8217;t work on the 244 which I later bought. The speed is different, and I think something else too. My work tapes are not compatible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-317173</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 20:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-317173</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-317151&quot;&gt;Jack&lt;/a&gt;.

hey man.  nope, that link is dead.  c.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-317151">Jack</a>.</p>
<p>hey man.  nope, that link is dead.  c.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jack		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-317151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2015 14:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-317151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey, do you still have the PDF of the manual  ?
I tried clicking on the link but I can&#039;t find it. 
Thanks !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, do you still have the PDF of the manual  ?<br />
I tried clicking on the link but I can&#8217;t find it.<br />
Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ton Koenig		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tascam-144-4-track-c-1979-original-catalog/#comment-159773</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ton Koenig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6587#comment-159773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And don&#039;t forget the much smaller Fostex X-15 4-track cassette recorder. A cute little number..ha ha.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And don&#8217;t forget the much smaller Fostex X-15 4-track cassette recorder. A cute little number..ha ha.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
