<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: BE100_schem2	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/tech-rca-be-100/be100_schem2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tech-rca-be-100/be100_schem2/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug Williams		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/tech-rca-be-100/be100_schem2/#comment-6859</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 14:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/BE100_schem2.jpg#comment-6859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The opamps on the RCA BA-101A preamps can be API or Melcor, depending on era.  API didn&#039;t build anything other than the opamp.   

The EQ appears to be entirely RCA in design.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The opamps on the RCA BA-101A preamps can be API or Melcor, depending on era.  API didn&#8217;t build anything other than the opamp.   </p>
<p>The EQ appears to be entirely RCA in design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
