<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The KEF Model 101 Mini-Monitor of 1979	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/the-kef-model-101-mini-monitor-of-1979/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-kef-model-101-mini-monitor-of-1979/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:40:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: BGHG		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-kef-model-101-mini-monitor-of-1979/#comment-657200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BGHG]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 15:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7201#comment-657200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I worked in the audio industry when these were made.  I have sold and own them.  Kef like any audio company had &quot;Winners &#038; Losers&quot; for models.  So did all companies.  The Kef 101 was a &quot;Winner&quot; as it used highly sought after Kef components.  Fact: Rogers LS3/5a speakers are all the same drivers of the Kef 101.  The Kefs project a large sound stage for their size, are well balanced with seamless transition.  They work well with a plethora of quality electronics from high end receivers such as the Luxman 1120, to Mac tubes.  I highly recommend for those who listen to music for the tonal qualities of string, brass and percussion not to mention the voices.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I worked in the audio industry when these were made.  I have sold and own them.  Kef like any audio company had &#8220;Winners &amp; Losers&#8221; for models.  So did all companies.  The Kef 101 was a &#8220;Winner&#8221; as it used highly sought after Kef components.  Fact: Rogers LS3/5a speakers are all the same drivers of the Kef 101.  The Kefs project a large sound stage for their size, are well balanced with seamless transition.  They work well with a plethora of quality electronics from high end receivers such as the Luxman 1120, to Mac tubes.  I highly recommend for those who listen to music for the tonal qualities of string, brass and percussion not to mention the voices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alfonso		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-kef-model-101-mini-monitor-of-1979/#comment-631348</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alfonso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2023 19:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7201#comment-631348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[These are my number one speakers.  Mine are used with a Technics SU8600 amp which put out 72watts I believe.  The combination is terrific.  The imaging is ridiculous and with vocals these speakers are like none other.  I gave mine a recap and new speaker terminals and that did make a bit of an improvement (i think) however they sounded amazing before this so might be just between my ears.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are my number one speakers.  Mine are used with a Technics SU8600 amp which put out 72watts I believe.  The combination is terrific.  The imaging is ridiculous and with vocals these speakers are like none other.  I gave mine a recap and new speaker terminals and that did make a bit of an improvement (i think) however they sounded amazing before this so might be just between my ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lj		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-kef-model-101-mini-monitor-of-1979/#comment-618109</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 07:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7201#comment-618109</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I heard these gems way back in my teen years going from one audio shop to the next trying out speakers with my old man. It was one thing we both loved to do. Our favorite test song was Bruce Cockburn&#039;s - Wondering where the Lions Are. These small but heavy speakers are simply mind blowing! I remember my jaw dropping. The smooth bass roll off and huge sound! One day I hope to own a pair.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard these gems way back in my teen years going from one audio shop to the next trying out speakers with my old man. It was one thing we both loved to do. Our favorite test song was Bruce Cockburn&#8217;s &#8211; Wondering where the Lions Are. These small but heavy speakers are simply mind blowing! I remember my jaw dropping. The smooth bass roll off and huge sound! One day I hope to own a pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nico		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-kef-model-101-mini-monitor-of-1979/#comment-591021</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nico]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 15:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7201#comment-591021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I forgot to add one more very important practical fact. These speakers are so small that also my wife finds them acceptable in the living room. The subwoofer can be easily put out of sight due to lack of directionality at low frequency.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to add one more very important practical fact. These speakers are so small that also my wife finds them acceptable in the living room. The subwoofer can be easily put out of sight due to lack of directionality at low frequency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nico		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-kef-model-101-mini-monitor-of-1979/#comment-591020</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nico]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Sep 2019 15:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7201#comment-591020</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I own a pair since a year now. First time I heard these at a second hand seller I was immediately blown away. Added a small REL quake subwoofer. Driven by NAD C372. I find this a brilliant combination, but most of that is due to the KEFs. Is is just amazing that speaker of almost 40 years old are so good. The combination of KEF with subwoofer is easy match because the KEFs do not pretend to have bass. KEF also do not use bass reflex making them easy to position.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I own a pair since a year now. First time I heard these at a second hand seller I was immediately blown away. Added a small REL quake subwoofer. Driven by NAD C372. I find this a brilliant combination, but most of that is due to the KEFs. Is is just amazing that speaker of almost 40 years old are so good. The combination of KEF with subwoofer is easy match because the KEFs do not pretend to have bass. KEF also do not use bass reflex making them easy to position.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Carl		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-kef-model-101-mini-monitor-of-1979/#comment-187769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2013 03:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7201#comment-187769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sheee-oot. I had a pair of these in the mid-80s. Sweet, low coloration for the time, but limited dynamics. Good imaging once you ditched the grills. Like most amps and speakers of that era, terrible wire connections. The B-110 woofer was the midrange driver used in the 105. It needed a powerful amp to get it to sing (81dB!), but then you had to be careful of breaking it with too much juice. This was considered as an alternative to the LS 3/5a BBC monitor; some considered it to be better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sheee-oot. I had a pair of these in the mid-80s. Sweet, low coloration for the time, but limited dynamics. Good imaging once you ditched the grills. Like most amps and speakers of that era, terrible wire connections. The B-110 woofer was the midrange driver used in the 105. It needed a powerful amp to get it to sing (81dB!), but then you had to be careful of breaking it with too much juice. This was considered as an alternative to the LS 3/5a BBC monitor; some considered it to be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
