<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Pilot &#8216;Pilotrol&#8217; Hi Fi Preamp of the early 1950s	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/the-pilot-pilotrol-hi-fi-preamp-of-the-early-1950s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-pilot-pilotrol-hi-fi-preamp-of-the-early-1950s/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 02:22:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Henry		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-pilot-pilotrol-hi-fi-preamp-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-632362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Henry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2023 02:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2593#comment-632362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My grandfather worked at Pilot for 20 years he was there lead cabinet maker. I still have wood working tools he used there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My grandfather worked at Pilot for 20 years he was there lead cabinet maker. I still have wood working tools he used there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-pilot-pilotrol-hi-fi-preamp-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-214024</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2593#comment-214024</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pilotrol is the preamplifier product line of Pilot.  Actually, the mono period of Pilot Hi-Fi gears were licensed by RCA since 1952.  Pilotrol PA-913 was the last mono preamplifier model.  This preamplifier has very rich body and warm tone, tasteful mid to mid-low range, extremely flexible on tone control as well.  It was the very first US commercial Hi-Fi preamplifier (consumer model) with UV record meter.  FYI, UV record meter also became the icon of Pilotrol in late 50-60, as flagship stereo preamplifier model of Pilot such as Pilot SP-215, Pilot SP-216 and Pilot SP-216A were also equipped with double UV meter at the front panel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pilotrol is the preamplifier product line of Pilot.  Actually, the mono period of Pilot Hi-Fi gears were licensed by RCA since 1952.  Pilotrol PA-913 was the last mono preamplifier model.  This preamplifier has very rich body and warm tone, tasteful mid to mid-low range, extremely flexible on tone control as well.  It was the very first US commercial Hi-Fi preamplifier (consumer model) with UV record meter.  FYI, UV record meter also became the icon of Pilotrol in late 50-60, as flagship stereo preamplifier model of Pilot such as Pilot SP-215, Pilot SP-216 and Pilot SP-216A were also equipped with double UV meter at the front panel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tony		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-pilot-pilotrol-hi-fi-preamp-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-140478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 08:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2593#comment-140478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the well written post Chris, I found it informative at the Pilotrol level, and interesting at the philosophical one. Regarding the Pilot, I would say that the little listening I have done has led me to start my own search for a pair. I plan to hook them up to a recently purchased pair of Leak TL 25A power amps.  Driven by a Garrard 301 and played through a pair of Tannoy GRF Memorys (Memories?). So far even using a Scott 355 preamp, the system really creates that &quot;vintage resonance&quot;. I see modern gear as amplifying sound, and vintage gear as amplifying emotion. I have a feeling that those bad-boy &#039;Trols are going to be the proverbial dogs bollocks! And as for the UI, personally i like to fiddle.. but more importantly (other than the sound itself), I really love that Fitz Lang Metropolis, steam punk design thing they have going there..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the well written post Chris, I found it informative at the Pilotrol level, and interesting at the philosophical one. Regarding the Pilot, I would say that the little listening I have done has led me to start my own search for a pair. I plan to hook them up to a recently purchased pair of Leak TL 25A power amps.  Driven by a Garrard 301 and played through a pair of Tannoy GRF Memorys (Memories?). So far even using a Scott 355 preamp, the system really creates that &#8220;vintage resonance&#8221;. I see modern gear as amplifying sound, and vintage gear as amplifying emotion. I have a feeling that those bad-boy &#8216;Trols are going to be the proverbial dogs bollocks! And as for the UI, personally i like to fiddle.. but more importantly (other than the sound itself), I really love that Fitz Lang Metropolis, steam punk design thing they have going there..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-pilot-pilotrol-hi-fi-preamp-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-13137</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 02:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2593#comment-13137</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think the Marantz 7 got it right all in all, other than having each channel have its own bass and treble tone control, and I would add a stepped stereo attenuator to replace the volume pots today.  Of course, we wouldn&#039;t NEED preamps if CD players had volume controls! And a full parametric EQ would be nice on occasion if we could switch it in and out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Marantz 7 got it right all in all, other than having each channel have its own bass and treble tone control, and I would add a stepped stereo attenuator to replace the volume pots today.  Of course, we wouldn&#8217;t NEED preamps if CD players had volume controls! And a full parametric EQ would be nice on occasion if we could switch it in and out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Craig		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-pilot-pilotrol-hi-fi-preamp-of-the-early-1950s/#comment-13029</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 16:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2593#comment-13029</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[mono shmono. Get two! :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mono shmono. Get two! 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
