<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Publison DHM 89 B2: Highly advanced signal processor/sampler c. 1978	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:04:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-624412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2022 17:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-624412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A studio I worked at 1982-1992 had two 89s and the key board. 
Good sounding but glitchy glitchy. Tough to set well. 
If they broke, you had to ship to France and wait 6 months. 
The studio owner, frustrated, set me up with a digikey chip tester and we fixed a unit eventually. Publison dremeled off all the chip numbers. The chip tester could identify chips and inform if blown. 

It was rare for any studio clients to use the keyboard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A studio I worked at 1982-1992 had two 89s and the key board.<br />
Good sounding but glitchy glitchy. Tough to set well.<br />
If they broke, you had to ship to France and wait 6 months.<br />
The studio owner, frustrated, set me up with a digikey chip tester and we fixed a unit eventually. Publison dremeled off all the chip numbers. The chip tester could identify chips and inform if blown. </p>
<p>It was rare for any studio clients to use the keyboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ableton Live (11.0.2) Crack [Mac] +Torrent-Keygen Full Version License Key!		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-607492</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ableton Live (11.0.2) Crack [Mac] +Torrent-Keygen Full Version License Key!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2021 05:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-607492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Max for Live pitch-shifting device created in collaboration with Robert Henke and inspired by the Publison DHM 89 – an early digital effects processor. Inspired by Nature: Six playful instruments and effects [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Max for Live pitch-shifting device created in collaboration with Robert Henke and inspired by the Publison DHM 89 – an early digital effects processor. Inspired by Nature: Six playful instruments and effects [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JPChalte		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-409416</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JPChalte]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 05:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-409416</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi People;

Juste one thing : [Infernal Machine] and [DHM89B2] are not the same product.  

Both have différents fonction, and purpose, so the title is wrong, but information are right...^^

Best regards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi People;</p>
<p>Juste one thing : [Infernal Machine] and [DHM89B2] are not the same product.  </p>
<p>Both have différents fonction, and purpose, so the title is wrong, but information are right&#8230;^^</p>
<p>Best regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: M. Geddes Gengras		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-308309</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M. Geddes Gengras]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 04:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-308309</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have (&#038; love) one of these units!! It&#039;s touchy as hell and only works about 70% of the times I turn it on but when it does it&#039;s a beautiful thing. Used it a ton on my 2013 album ISHI on Leaving Records/Stones Throw to thicken/detune/shimmer/loop the synths, it sounds like NOTHING ELSE on earth, someone needs to do an amazing plugin version!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have (&amp; love) one of these units!! It&#8217;s touchy as hell and only works about 70% of the times I turn it on but when it does it&#8217;s a beautiful thing. Used it a ton on my 2013 album ISHI on Leaving Records/Stones Throw to thicken/detune/shimmer/loop the synths, it sounds like NOTHING ELSE on earth, someone needs to do an amazing plugin version!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ton Koenig		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-159790</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ton Koenig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-159790</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I passed up on Publison in 1991  for $800(regrets) but later bought its modern replacement..the Roland VP-9000.  Really cool device.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I passed up on Publison in 1991  for $800(regrets) but later bought its modern replacement..the Roland VP-9000.  Really cool device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-158487</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-158487</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-158102&quot;&gt;e g weekly&lt;/a&gt;.

I didn&#039;t know that he&#039;d even ever got it working.

 I built an amp about ten years ago that was basically an AC30 driving four EL84s through a driver transformer that used a vertical oscillator tube. Other than that it was all 12Afum7s and 84s. Solid state rectifier of course because tube rectifiers with Class A designs are idiot&#039;s play. 

 People liked it until they found out it had this oddball tube and a transformer that cost a little money. Because musicians hear with their eyes and see with their ears that was the end of that. 

 If people freak out at ONE tube Guitar Center doesn&#039;t have 25 seems ridiculous.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-158102">e g weekly</a>.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t know that he&#8217;d even ever got it working.</p>
<p> I built an amp about ten years ago that was basically an AC30 driving four EL84s through a driver transformer that used a vertical oscillator tube. Other than that it was all 12Afum7s and 84s. Solid state rectifier of course because tube rectifiers with Class A designs are idiot&#8217;s play. </p>
<p> People liked it until they found out it had this oddball tube and a transformer that cost a little money. Because musicians hear with their eyes and see with their ears that was the end of that. </p>
<p> If people freak out at ONE tube Guitar Center doesn&#8217;t have 25 seems ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: e g weekly		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-158102</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e g weekly]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-158102</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-157919&quot;&gt;bafflegab&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh yes, the Fucking Fucker. I played it at NAMM. It was nearly impossible for the average person to get any recognizable sound out of and every tube in it was nothing you&#039;d find in a music store or a music supply chain. 

 Eric Barbour is a self taught hobby type and like so many of those does not see things in the way Leo Fender did.  It&#039;s no coincidence this amp was never replicated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-157919">bafflegab</a>.</p>
<p>Oh yes, the Fucking Fucker. I played it at NAMM. It was nearly impossible for the average person to get any recognizable sound out of and every tube in it was nothing you&#8217;d find in a music store or a music supply chain. </p>
<p> Eric Barbour is a self taught hobby type and like so many of those does not see things in the way Leo Fender did.  It&#8217;s no coincidence this amp was never replicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-157919</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 20:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-157919</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reminiscent of this:

http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/01/18/fucking-fucker/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reminiscent of this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/01/18/fucking-fucker/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.synthtopia.com/content/2008/01/18/fucking-fucker/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Halma		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-publison-infernal-machine-dhm-89-b2-highly-advanced-signal-processorsampler-c-1978/#comment-157564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Halma]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 17:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6538#comment-157564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[WTF...that looks noice.  Looks like someone could have some serious fun with it...at least me. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WTF&#8230;that looks noice.  Looks like someone could have some serious fun with it&#8230;at least me. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
