<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Voyetra 8 Analog Polysynth c. 1982	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/the-voyetra-8-analog-polysynth-c-1982/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-voyetra-8-analog-polysynth-c-1982/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 02:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John L		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/the-voyetra-8-analog-polysynth-c-1982/#comment-619694</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John L]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2022 02:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7678#comment-619694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes, it was a beauty (especially loaded with all those SSM chips). However, in the end I couldn’t get on with it as the programming is VERY counter-intuitive. Mine was the latest REV with all of the documentation, etc.
Would’ve been nice to keep but I like to use these beasts to make music so if they’re not working out in that regard… goodbye.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it was a beauty (especially loaded with all those SSM chips). However, in the end I couldn’t get on with it as the programming is VERY counter-intuitive. Mine was the latest REV with all of the documentation, etc.<br />
Would’ve been nice to keep but I like to use these beasts to make music so if they’re not working out in that regard… goodbye.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
