Comments on: Three interesting Hi Fi Amps circa 1948

By: barry

barry — Tue, 21 Feb 2023 02:59:47 +0000

the amplifier in the circuit shows a 6u7 g which i a variable mu rf pentode whereas the article calls it a 6u6 which is an output pentode 12 watts dissipation
a careful look at the circuit will show that the grid does NOT have a pin number because the valve has a GRID CAP ( consistant with rf/if amplifiers) the grid lead on the circuit shows that it is a shielded cable
a variable mu valve can be used for very low level input signals (here a mic makes sense) without gain variations/fluctuations in performance…
…the grid cap would have conveniently connected to the tp of an ”if” transformer with a very short lead…

By: chris

chris — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:39:03 +0000

In reply to Brad.

ya that’s certainly true… i should clarify… i tend to use the term ‘hi fi’ in a generic-descriptor sort-of-way to mean ‘consumer audio domestic audio equipment,’ kinda like most people use the term ‘Stereo,’ like, hey, Dave, turn up the stereo! Now, i would just USE the term ‘stereo’ but… it does’t really make sense for Mono equipment. so. Hi Fi. Not to be confused with actual High Degree Of Fidelity To The Original Recorded Sound.

By: Brad

Brad — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:19:16 +0000

These are not, in any modern sense, “high fidelity” amplifiers. They weren’t even by fifties standards. They are utility, public address amplifiers.

By: Bafflegab

Bafflegab — Tue, 13 Nov 2012 03:28:45 +0000

Grid leak bias is well documented and was the standard early on in radio work. It’s undesirable for audio where there is a large dynamic range and is overly dependent on tube characteristics. Early Fenders used it and getting rid of it was one of Leo’s better moves.

Not having a radio background is a serious handicap many of the audio DIYers suffer from today. I consider building a radio or two a necessary dues paying activity.