Comments on: Tubes vs. Transistors in Recording Equipment https://www.preservationsound.com/tubes-vs-transistors-in-recording-equipment/ information and ideas about audio history Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:00:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Jerry Dillon https://www.preservationsound.com/tubes-vs-transistors-in-recording-equipment/#comment-13619 Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:00:52 +0000 http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2066#comment-13619 No, I’m not going to pay $20 to AES for a forty year old article. I’m sorry, I’m not now and am not going to join AES, especially since their conventions are nothing but a phat toob mic pre fest anymore. Nothing but overpriced recording gear. No speakers, no amplifiers, no nothing anymore.

Copyright duration needs a trimming back. Badly.

]]> By: Jay McKnight https://www.preservationsound.com/tubes-vs-transistors-in-recording-equipment/#comment-13519 Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:06:27 +0000 http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2066#comment-13519 In reply to Brad Rinkert.

Nothing evil here: “The later article Hamm wrote, “Transistors Can Sound Better Than Tubes”” is published in the AES Journal, it’s just not free (5 $ for AES members, 20 $ for non-members). Go to “http://www.aes.org”, then to “publications”, then “AES E-Library”, enter “Hamm”, and search.

]]> By: Brad Rinkert https://www.preservationsound.com/tubes-vs-transistors-in-recording-equipment/#comment-6543 Wed, 19 Oct 2011 07:10:16 +0000 http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=2066#comment-6543 The later article Hamm wrote, “Transistors Can Sound Better Than Tubes”, is MUCH tougher to find. I wonder why.

]]>