<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: What does &#8220;Rock&#8221; mean?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/what-does-rock-mean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/what-does-rock-mean/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: bafflegab		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/what-does-rock-mean/#comment-194548</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bafflegab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=7419#comment-194548</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Before &quot; rock and roll&quot; was used that way, they said &quot;jazzing&quot;. That&#039;s what my grandfather and his cronies called it: though they certainly never talked about it with us, we had better hearing than they suspected and overheard a lot. 

 Nick Tosches is a smart guy and a creative writer: in fact, a little too creative sometimes. He&#039;s too much a fabulist to be considered a historian. Much of what he writes has to be taken with a grain of salt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before &#8221; rock and roll&#8221; was used that way, they said &#8220;jazzing&#8221;. That&#8217;s what my grandfather and his cronies called it: though they certainly never talked about it with us, we had better hearing than they suspected and overheard a lot. </p>
<p> Nick Tosches is a smart guy and a creative writer: in fact, a little too creative sometimes. He&#8217;s too much a fabulist to be considered a historian. Much of what he writes has to be taken with a grain of salt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
