<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Yamaha MC-1X and MC-1S phono cartridge	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/</link>
	<description>information and ideas about audio history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 18:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Gabriel Mateiciuc		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-562592</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel Mateiciuc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6863#comment-562592</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-367010&quot;&gt;Barry Welton (My phone is 203-758-6492)&lt;/a&gt;.

Shure, if you&#039;re willing to part with it.
I have a Yamaha PF-800 table with a MC-9 that already sounds great. The MC-1S should complete the front end.
That goes back to a A-1000 speaking through a pair of NS-1000M.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-367010">Barry Welton (My phone is 203-758-6492)</a>.</p>
<p>Shure, if you&#8217;re willing to part with it.<br />
I have a Yamaha PF-800 table with a MC-9 that already sounds great. The MC-1S should complete the front end.<br />
That goes back to a A-1000 speaking through a pair of NS-1000M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: STS		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-541303</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[STS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 19:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6863#comment-541303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, I had the lovely Yamaha MC-1 Cartridge in the late &#039;70 and early &#039;80. Beautiful Cartridge with a delicious sound to it. The only thing was, that I also had a couple of Fidelity Research MC-201&#039;s - they made every listening experience an almost religious revelation. Can&#039;t believe I threw them out just last year - should have tried to make for instance Sound Smith rebuild them ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I had the lovely Yamaha MC-1 Cartridge in the late &#8217;70 and early &#8217;80. Beautiful Cartridge with a delicious sound to it. The only thing was, that I also had a couple of Fidelity Research MC-201&#8217;s &#8211; they made every listening experience an almost religious revelation. Can&#8217;t believe I threw them out just last year &#8211; should have tried to make for instance Sound Smith rebuild them &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-476593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2018 20:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6863#comment-476593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a Yamaha MC-1S on a FR-64S tonearm on a Luxman PD-441, serving backup vinyl playing on a multi-hundred K $ system. It sounds amazingly close to a 30K modern vinyl rig through the same system.  The Yamaha MC cartridges of the 70&#039;s were all good, and the MC-1S is the best of the bunch. It competes with almost anything, past or present.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Yamaha MC-1S on a FR-64S tonearm on a Luxman PD-441, serving backup vinyl playing on a multi-hundred K $ system. It sounds amazingly close to a 30K modern vinyl rig through the same system.  The Yamaha MC cartridges of the 70&#8217;s were all good, and the MC-1S is the best of the bunch. It competes with almost anything, past or present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dirk		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-378640</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dirk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6863#comment-378640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-367010&quot;&gt;Barry Welton (My phone is 203-758-6492)&lt;/a&gt;.

Please yes, I am interested..

Dirk  ( Netherlands)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-367010">Barry Welton (My phone is 203-758-6492)</a>.</p>
<p>Please yes, I am interested..</p>
<p>Dirk  ( Netherlands)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Welton (My phone is 203-758-6492)		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-367010</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Welton (My phone is 203-758-6492)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6863#comment-367010</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I have a Yamaha MC-1S with &#060; 10 hours use on it.  Is it worth anything to anyone??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a Yamaha MC-1S with &lt; 10 hours use on it.  Is it worth anything to anyone??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nat Eddy		</title>
		<link>https://www.preservationsound.com/yamaha-mc-1x-and-mc-1s-phono-cartridge/#comment-201071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nat Eddy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.preservationsound.com/?p=6863#comment-201071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve used several Yamaha moving coils, including the MC1s.  My first mc was the MC 7, which was a not quite entry level mc, and was clean, precise and well balanced, but didn&#039;t have the warmth/oomph/frequency extension that the MC 1s did.  It was one of the best cartridges I&#039;ve encountered, even though I got it used.  I plan to have it retipped, but right now I&#039;m working through a stock of cartridges and stylii that I already have, so the cost benefit ration doesn&#039;t work.  
Yamaha&#039;s cartridges have a good reputation.  If  you want wackiness in a Yamaha, you should look at their &#039;ear&#039; speakers, which had a flat styrofoam driver that was sort of shaped like an ear, as the ill conceived advertisements put it.  In fact it was more like a rounded off rectangle with one corner cut off, which both broke up resonant modes (which can be severe in styrofoam) and allowed a place to put a tweeter.  The drivers were typically in a very shallow box with no real back, so they were functionally dipoles, with all the complexities of placement that implies.  They tanked on the market, but I suspect that properly set up (which they probably rarely were) they might have some real appeal.  That&#039;s just a guess based on my other experience with open baffle drivers -- I&#039;ve never heard them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used several Yamaha moving coils, including the MC1s.  My first mc was the MC 7, which was a not quite entry level mc, and was clean, precise and well balanced, but didn&#8217;t have the warmth/oomph/frequency extension that the MC 1s did.  It was one of the best cartridges I&#8217;ve encountered, even though I got it used.  I plan to have it retipped, but right now I&#8217;m working through a stock of cartridges and stylii that I already have, so the cost benefit ration doesn&#8217;t work.<br />
Yamaha&#8217;s cartridges have a good reputation.  If  you want wackiness in a Yamaha, you should look at their &#8216;ear&#8217; speakers, which had a flat styrofoam driver that was sort of shaped like an ear, as the ill conceived advertisements put it.  In fact it was more like a rounded off rectangle with one corner cut off, which both broke up resonant modes (which can be severe in styrofoam) and allowed a place to put a tweeter.  The drivers were typically in a very shallow box with no real back, so they were functionally dipoles, with all the complexities of placement that implies.  They tanked on the market, but I suspect that properly set up (which they probably rarely were) they might have some real appeal.  That&#8217;s just a guess based on my other experience with open baffle drivers &#8212; I&#8217;ve never heard them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
