Categories
Manufacturers Uncategorized

Forgotten 70s Pro Audio maker Gately Electronics

Gately_Stereo_Mixer_Briefcase_1970Above: Gately’s Stereo Briefcase Mixer circa 1970.

Gately Electronics was a Pennsylvania-based pro-audio manufacturing and importation/ distribution operation which seems to have operated between 1968 and 1975.  I often noticed adverts for their EM7 mixer in the old AES journals; the EM7 had a sort-of Pultec or maybe LANG vibe, and I was curious enough that when I found one AS-IS for $100 on eBay I went for it.  You can read my account of restoring my EM7 and its attendent EQ7 outboard equalizer accessory at this link.  The short version: it is a very well-built machine, and I was therefore surprised that Gately seems to be completely forgotten in the pro audio world.  Anyhow, I noticed that a pair of AS-IS Gately 1800 compressor cards went for an absurd amount of money on eBay last month, so I figured that maybe the world does need to know.  I therefore present: every piece of period documentation that I could find on Gately Electronics, its products, and operations.  Enjoy, and let us know if you are using any of this kit nowadays.

Gately_ProKitMixer_1972 Moms_Wholesome_Audio_Mixer_1973 Gately_ProKit_2_1974 Gately_PK6_EQ6_1972 Gately_C1616_Console_1975 Gately_ad_1974 Gately_1974_Micromixer

Above, from top to bottom: Gately ProKit 6-channel mixer (available as kit or assembled!), Gately’s Moms Wholesome Audio live PA board, Gately ProKit 2 mixer, and Gately EQ-6 and EK-6 equalizer and reverb accessories for the Pro-Kit (confused yet?).  Below that, John Yoder of Hope Recordings recommends the Gately C1616 studio console.  Next is an advert announcing Gately’s distribution of Ortofon lathes and Schoeps mics (yes please). Finally we see the Gately Micromixer, which appears to perhaps be the same as Moms Wholesome Audio Mixer?

Gately_EM7_Mixer_1969

Gately_EQ7_EQ_1969

*****************************************************************

Gately_Em7s_1971

Gately_PEQ7_1971

***********************************************************************

Above: the Gately EM7 and EQ7, as described in my earlier article, followed by the subsequent updated versions EM7s and PEQ7.  The PEQ7 seems to have exchanged th fixed hi-shelf control of the EQ7 for a five-frequency high bell curve EQ.  Low frequency control is presumably still a shelf-type.   I can’t find any other info on the ES-7 echo unit.

In 1974 a writer from DB (I imagine Woram or Zide; no credit is indicated) traveled to Gately’s Philadelphia-area facility.

You can download the account of their trip at this link: Gately_DB_Feb74

Gately_Factory_1974_2Gately_Factory_1974If there are any Gately alums out there, drop us a line; and if anyone out there is using any of this Gately kit, please let us know your thoughts.  I have yet to use my EM7 and EQ7 on a production, but at some point I hope to be able to do a shoot-out versus some better-known contemporary units such as API and Neve.

*************

*******

***

From PS dot com reader J. Roberts:

“I have a Gately Prokit II that I bought from Bob Todrank back around 1976. Bob had one of the first audio businesses in Berry Hill.

The mixer still works, no repairs ever, factory wired, I think it may be something like serial # 101w, but I will have to look and see. I kept a search on ebay for Gately and finally something surfaced… an original manual for my mixer.

I like that mixer because it is simple, no eq or anything to mess up, just set levels and pan. Interesting that the headphone out has no volume control, but I bought an old pair of Koss with faders just to use with that mixer. It looks to have very high quality components.  I do not know about ICs, wondering if the ones in there are ok or should be upgraded.  Does not have the output transformer option either.  In a day or two I plan to feed a Coopersound micpre into the line ins and see what I get.  I guess I should lay down some tracks and make another classical guitar LP, as I did back around 1978. Mastered at NRP by Larry Boden. Very fun times.”

Categories
Uncategorized

Obscure Mechanical Reverbs of the 70s

MasterRoom_reverb_1976 Quad8_RV10_Reverb_1973 Sennheiser_CV571_Reverb_1970If you’ve been reading this website for a while, you will know that I really dig old spring reverb units.  At Gold Coast Recorders we have an Orban 111b, a SoundWorkshop 242B, a a DIY’d mono tube unit based on the classic Fender tube 3-knob, and we recently added a mod’d Pioneer RS-101 stereo tube reverb to the lineup.  In addition, I use a built-out Fisher Space Expander in my lil home studio.  But there is always more out there, and ain’t that true.   Above: the Master Room series C, the Quad-8 RV-10, and the Sennheiser (!!!) CV-571.  Anyone using these units for music production these days?  Drop us a line and weigh in on ’em.

Categories
Uncategorized

Technics ‘Professional’ Audio Line of the 1970s

Technics_Pro_intro_ad_19771977: Matsushita’s TECHNICS division announce their line of rack-mountable prosumer audio equipment.  I rarely come across this stuff; they must not have sold too many of these.  By 1979 the line consisted of the RSM-85 cassette deck, SE-9060 ‘DC-to-100k’ power amp, SH-9010 graphic EQ (with +/- one-octave center-adjust!), ST-908 Tuner, and the absurd RS-9900US cassette deck, which featured independent transport and EQ/amp chassis.

Technics_ST9038_tuner_1978 Technics_SH9010_EQ_1978 Technics_SE_9060_1977 Technics_RSM85mk2_1979 Technics_RSM85_1978 Technics_RS9900US_Tape_DeckI really, really want one of those RS-M85 tape decks.  They seem to go for about $200 on eBay (when confirmed operational).  Anyone using of these nowadays?

Categories
Uncategorized

Neve Consoles of the 1970s

Neve_1975Neve_8014_1973 RCA_Neve_1972 Neve_Custom_Console_1971 Neve_Console_Lineup_1974 Neve_BCM_10_1970Above: Neve 8014, 8036, BCM 10, et al circa the early to mid 1970s.  Neve’s US operation  was based in Bethel CT for many years; I grew up in Bethel, but I can’t recall them sponsoring any little-league teams.

Categories
Recording Studio History

ADM Console built for Fine Recording, INC

ADR_Console_FineRecording_1970

In the account of his folk’s FINE RECORDING, INC., operation, Tom Fine mentioned the custom ADM console that was installed at the end of the 1960s.  I stumbled across a period trade-ad announcing this installation and add it here to the stack.  For the telling of the whole F.R.I. story, click here.

Categories
Early Electronic Music

1970: When Wendy Was Walter

WendyWasWalter_1970_DolbyShortly before successful composer Walter Carlos enacted a major life-change, he appeared in this advert for Dolby noise-reduction hardware.

Categories
Pro Audio Archive

When they were young: introducing a few audio classics

API_52_Intro_1970 Shure_Sm58_1970 U47_fet_introAd Urei_LA3A_intro_1970Circa 1970: The API 512, Shure SM58, Neumann FET 47, and Urei LA-3A all have got something to prove to you.

Categories
Recording Studio History

February is 70’s Month At Preservation Sound Dot Com

SpectrumStudio_SantaMonica_1977Ah the 1970s: that in-between-time which spanned the earthy-idealism and radical upheavals of the 1960s with the slick techno-consumerist-complacency of the 1980s.  Having spent most of the decade as an unfertilzed egg I can’t really offer any first-hand account, but I think we can agree that this at least holds true in the popular imagination.  Media critics often use the term ‘incoherent’ to describe the texts that come from this time period, meaning that there is often very faulty logic revealed when the binary signifiers within the texts are mapped out and correlated.  The 70s saw the ascension of Asian technology, New Hollywood, and Rock-Music-As-Industry. Rock-into-punk, soul-into-disco, and transistors into everything.

People tell me that I am obsessed with the 1970s.  Now, I am not consciously aware of any particular bias that I have towards this time period (or its cultural products), but ain’t it true that we often see ourselves very differently than others see us.  Psychologists call this The Problem Of The Differential Fit.  NEways…  Here’s some photos of 1970’s recording-studio-dreamlands to get ya started.   Man could you imagine going to work in one of these crazy, lurid dream-factories everyday?  Amazing.  The lights, colors, the mirrors, the supergraphics…   Much more to come so stay tuned.   (btw – photo attributions refer only to the image directly above the text – the other images, i have no idea).1975

Above: unknown studio circa 1970

BellSound_Hollywood_1970Above: Bell Sound Santa MonicaCapriconStudio_Macon_1974Capricorn Studio, Macon GA

Fantasy_1980Fantasy Studio, San Francisco Kendun_Records_1974 SoundWest_DanDiesgo_1980_isos

Above: Sound West San Diegostudio_dreams_1971_2 Studio_Dreams_1971 Studio_dreams_1975 Studio_Dreams_1976 Studio_Dreams_1981 StudioDreams_1971_3

Categories
Custom Fabrication

The Black Box

BlackBoxLet’s just say hypothetically that you had to write+ record a tremendous amount of guitar-based music very quickly.  And even though you work at a recording studio filled with numerous custom and vintage-modified tube amps and great microphones, this music needed to be recorded in a modest home-studio using the not-awful but not-awesome Line 6 POD Pro XT.  Could there be some device that might bridge this gap in audio aesthetics, if even a bit?

NameplateI’ve used the Line 6 ‘POD’ series of devices for a decade; they are not very good for recording prominently-featured electric guitar parts, but they definitely have their uses in the studio; the Bass Pod Pro has actually worked out well a few times, and the Pod Pro is often good to add grit to synths.   When music must be recorded in a domestic environment, though, a POD can be very helpful, at least logistically.  I recently bought the newer POD ‘PRO XT’ version for around $200 on eBay.  Aside from an annoying but sonically inconsequential mechanical-hum given off by the power transformer it seems to work fine.  It even has the ability to user-adjust the blend between close mics and far mics on the ‘Amps.’   Does it sound just like a good tube amp, well-mic’d, in a great sounding room?  No.  At best, it sounds rather like playback from a 16-bit ADAT, if any of y’all can remember that sound.  Not bad, but not very detailed and overall sterile.   I knew that some tubes, transformers, and real mechanical reverb could help transform the POD sound to something that I would be a little more comfortable with.  So when I found a Fisher Space Expander for $10 at the flea market last fall, this little project went up near the top of the list.

On_PanelThe Fisher is an old home HiFi reverb system with unbalanced -10 input and outputs; I need +4 balanced.  But I did not want to modify the Fisher unit in anyway (other than adding a grounded AC lead), since they are highly sought-after and i might want to sell it someday.  So i rigged it up inside this old salvaged DIY ham-receiver case with one of those MCM electronics balancing amps, and two inexpensive Jensen MOD series 9″ reverb chambers with medium-impedance inputs (around 300 ohms, I believe).  One tank is short decay, the other is long decay.  I realize that the 17″ larger tanks do sound better, but since this box was destined for my tiny home-studio, size is a real issue; I needed everything to fit inside the 14×8″ steel box.   I’ve already enjoyed the benefits of being able to select two different tanks; on tracks that feature two electric guitar parts I am easily able to situate each in its own ‘space.’

RearHere’s a rear-view of the whole fandango.  Balancing amp is on the right; note that it is stereo, and the unit is fully wired for stereo; that being said, the fisher only generates a mono reverb signal which is then blended into the stereo direct output path; since I am using the unit for mono guitar tracks, I just use one pair of the XLRs at the moment.

PotSwitchAt left: the ‘blend’ knob, and below that a DPDT on/on switch that selects one tank versus the other.

Someone very helpfully scanned and uploaded the manual and schematic for this device; click here to download the PDF directly from them.    There are not too many surprises in the schematic, other than that  the first reverb recovery stage has a 330k plate-load resistor; this is the highest value that I have ever seen, and it failed almost immediately.  Twice.  I eventually put a 2-watt CC in place of the original 1/2 watt, and changed the adjacent coupling cap as well.   I had to replace pretty much all the B+ resistors in the unit (and several coupling and bypass caps) in order to get rid of some nasty intermittent noises; now the unit is working fine and it sounds really good!  A word of advice if you get one of these things: run the input hot, and back off on the return level.  It takes A LOT of signal before it distorts or smacks the tank, and you will be rewarded with a much-improved signal-to-noise ratio.   The MCM balancing amp has handy gain-trims that make it easy to achieve overall unity gain on the direct signal while accomplishing this goal.

Click here for some previous tube-reverb system action on PS dot com

Categories
Uncategorized

1970: The Sound Of Money

SoundOfMoneyAmpexMM1000_1970listen to the sound

that money-making jingle

Ampex tape machines

Feel free to submit your own Haikus on this theme.  Click ‘leave comment’ below.